COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR HEALTH EDUCATION IN PAKISTAN: PARENTS PERSPECTIVE.
17 Downloads
103 Views
Abstract
Objective: Objective of the present study was to identify the perceptions of parents about performance of public and private sector health education institutes and parameters of their preference while choosing a medical or dental college for their children.
Methods: It was a qualitative study by design and parents of FSc and A-Level students were selected for semi-structured interviews. Purposive sampling was done for inclusion of participants and grounded theory approach was used for data collection and analysis. Constant comparative method was used for thematic content analysis. Computer Aided Qualitative Data Analysis Software NVIVO was used for data management and analysis.
Results: Four major themes including, affordability, college standard, academic excellence and patient exposure emerged from the data. Parents generally perceived private medical colleges low in performance and less trust worthy as compared to public sector health education institutes.
Conclusion: Majority of parents perceived Government medical and dental colleges as their first option because of low fees, strong infrastructure, more competition and patient exposure, low faculty turnover rate and more confidence in institute recognition. While private colleges were low on their priority list.
Keywords
Article Analytics
References
- Khan AJ. Scope of medical colleges in private sector. Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad: JAMC. 2003 Dec;16(1):1-3.
- Salam A, Haque M, Islam MZ, Helali AM, Yousuf R, Yesmin F, Alattraqchi AG, Rao UM. Comparative study of professionalism of future medical professionals among three private medical colleges of Bangladesh. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2013;6(3):170-9.
- Diwan V, Minj C, Chhari N, De Costa A. Indian medical students in public and private sector medical schools: are motivations and career aspirations different??studies from Madhya Pradesh, India. BMC medical education. 2013 Dec;13(1):127.
- Artino Jr AR, La Rochelle JS, Dezee KJ, Gehlbach H. Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE Guide No. 87. Medical teacher. 2014 Jun 1; 36(6):463-74.
- Glaser BG, Strauss AL. Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge; 2017 Jul 5.
- Flexner A. Medical education in the United States and Canada. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2002;80:594-602.
- Wilkinson R, Yussof I. Public and private provision of higher education in Malaysia: A comparative analysis. Higher Education. 2005 Oct 1;50(3):361-86.
- Cohen JJ. Professionalism in medical education, an American perspective: from evidence to accountability. Medical education. 2006 Jul;40(7):607-17.
- Ramani S, Leinster S. AMEE Guide no. 34: Teaching in the clinical environment. Medical teacher. 2008 Jan 1;30(4):347-64.
- Dent J, Harden RM, Hunt D. A practical guide for medical teachers. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2017 Apr 26.
How to Cite This Article
Shazia Nawabi, Ayesha Maqsood and Muhammad Qasim Javed. (2018); COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR HEALTH EDUCATION IN PAKISTAN: PARENTS PERSPECTIVE., Int. J. of Adv. Res., 6 (11), 612-619, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/8037
Corresponding Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





