Vol. 6 (11) pp. 780-785 DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/8058

NETWORKING SKILLS OF PROGRAM IMPLEMENTERS AND THE QUALITY OF ORGANIZATIONAL LINKAGES IN SELECTED STATE UNIVERSITIES IN THE PHILIPPINES.

  • Laguna State Polytechnic University, Sta. Cruz, Laguna, Philippines.
20 Downloads 105 Views
Crossref

Abstract

State colleges and universities (SUCs) in the Philippines established organizational linkages to better reach out to the communities. The SUCs entered into consortium contracts with other institutions to extend services through maximized expertise of the deans, faculty members, directors, and program implementers. Theextension services were issue-oriented and development-focused, to meet its minimum requirement as a truly transformative force. This descriptive study determined the influence of the networking skills of the deans, directors, and program implementers on the quality of the organizational linkages in selected state universities and colleges (SUCs) in the CALABARZON area, Philippines. It was found that the organizational linkages were highly and effectivelyimplemented in the SUCs. Power and influence, as a networking skill, predicted the quality of the organizational linkages as to advocacy. The quality of the organizational linkages as to community organizing capacity was induced by the program implementers? creativity and innovation, communication skill, leadership skill and power and influence. Capacitybuilding and network and alliance building was influenced by the program implementers? leadership skilland power and influence. It was concluded in the study that the organizational linkages, that were of high quality, enabled the SUCs to build their good imageand reputation. Mutual cooperation, knowledge mobility, network stability, and better services were achieved through the program implementers? networking skills as knowledge sharing, management of ideas, communication, innovation, and improved performance.

Keywords

Article Analytics

References

  1. Agarwal, R., &Selen, W. (2009). Dynamic Capability Building in Service Value Networks for Achieving Service Innovation. Decision Sciences, 40(3), 431?475. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2009.00236.x
  2. Angeles, E. P. (2003). School Organizations ? How can they managed effectively? Philippine Journal of Education, 22(5), 22-23.
  3. Blomqvist, K., & Levy, J. (2006). Collaboration capability a focal concept in knowledge creation and collaborative innovation in networks. International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 2(1), 31. doi:10.1504/ijmcp.2006.009645
  4. Dhanaraj, C., &Parkhe, A. (2006). Orchestrating Innovation Networks. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 659?669. doi:10.5465/amr.2006.21318923
  5. Dzamtovska-Zdravkovska, S. (2013). Normative regulation of internal communication within the government bodies in the Republic of Macedonia. Balkan Social Science Review, 1, 23-38.
  6. Fraenkel, J. K. &Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education 6th New York: McGraw Hill International Edition.
  7. Greensweig, D. J., Gourlay, A. & Kao, I. (2016). Increasing productive communication in local government and decreasing barriers to community interactions. Mitchell Hamline Law Review, 42(5), 1600-1628.
  8. Ki, E.-J., & Hon, L. C. (2007). Reliability and Validity of Organization-Public Relationship Measurement and Linkages among Relationship Indicators in a Membership Organization. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84(3), 419?438. doi:10.1177/107769900708400302
  9. Leavengood, S. A., Anderson, T. R., &Daim, TugrulUnsal (2014). Exploring Linkage of Quality Management to Innovation. Engineering and Technology Management Faculty Publications and Presentations. Paper 50. http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/etm_fac/50
  10. Mitchell, M. L. & Jolley, J. M. (2007). Research Design Explained. 6thUSA: Thomson Wadsworth.
  11. Mohanty, R. P. (1998). Understanding the integrated linkage: Quality and productivity. Total Quality Management, 9(8), 753?765. doi:10.1080/0954412988226
  12. Peterson, N. A., & Zimmerman, M. A. (2004). Beyond the Individual: Toward a Nomological Network of Organizational Empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 34(1-2), 129?145.doi:10.1023/b:ajcp.0000040151.77047.58
  13. Potter, C. &Brough, R. (2004). Systematic capacity building: a hierarchy of needs. Health Policy and Planning, 19(5), 336-345.
  14. Pricellas, V. S., Niez, R. A., Nierra, R. N. &Tubis, A. P. U. (2016). Effectiveness of school administrators? leadership skills and their school performance in Area III Leyte Division, Philippines. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 18(8), 106-126.
  15. Provan, K. G. &Kenis, P. (2007). Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229?252. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum015
  16. Sangivikumar, S. (2017). A study on training and capacity building for urban managers in Tamil Nadu. Asia Pacific Journal of Research, 1(3), 1-6. ISSN 2347-4793
  17. Tracey, P., & Clark, G. L. (2003). Alliances, Networks and Competitive Strategy: Rethinking Clusters of Innovation. Growth and Change, 34(1), 1?16. doi:10.1111/1468-2257.00196
  18. Wescott, C. G. & Jones L. R. (2007). Managing for results and performance in Asia: Assessing reform initiatives in the public sector. International Public Management Review, 8(1), 56-102.
  19. Yukl, G. (2008). How leaders influence organizational effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(6), 708?722. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.09.008.
 

How to Cite This Article

Merilyn P. Juacalla and Benny B. Juacalla. (2018); NETWORKING SKILLS OF PROGRAM IMPLEMENTERS AND THE QUALITY OF ORGANIZATIONAL LINKAGES IN SELECTED STATE UNIVERSITIES IN THE PHILIPPINES., Int. J. of Adv. Res., 6 (11), 780-785, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/8058

Corresponding Author

Merilyn P. Juacalla
Laguna State Polytechnic University