27Mar 2019

EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF THE TENSILE BOND STRENGTH OF TWO DIFFERENT LUTING AGENTS ON AN ENDODONTIC FIBER POST AFTER TWO DIFFERENT SURFACE TREATMENTS - AN IN VITRO STUDY.

  • BDS, MDS, Post Graduate, Department of Prosthodontics,Coorg Institute of Dental Sciences,Virajpet.
  • MDS, Proffesor and Chair, Department of Prosthodontics, Coorg Institute of Dental Sciences, Virajpet.
  • MDS, Senior Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics, Coorg Institute of Dental Sciences, Virajpet.
  • MDS, Proffesor and Head, Department of Prosthodontics,Coorg Institute of Dental Sciences, Virajpet.
  • MDS, Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Coorg Institute of Dental Sciences, Virajpet.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Purpose:To evaluate and compare tensile bond strength of two different luting agents on an endodontic fiber post after two different surface treatments. Methodology: 60 mandibular first premolar freshly extracted teeth were used. The root canals were prepared using a step-back technique and obturated. The roots were divided into 2 experimental groups based on the luting cements (Rely X U200 &Calibra) and further divided into 3 subgroups according to surface treatments used (n=10, subgroups are A- control, B- Laser, C- Sandblasting. After post cementation the specimens were cut in to three 2-mm-thick segments (1 apical, 1 middle, and 1 cervical) were prepared. The tensile bond strength was measured using a universal testing machine. The data was analysed using the independent t test and one way ANOVA test followed by Post Hoc Tukey?s test. Conclusion: Sandblasting of glass fiber post provided higher tensile bond strength values for Calibra cement hence it can be recommended as a surface treatment method suitable for glass fiber post and Calibra is the cement of choice.

  1. Gomes G M, Gomes O M M, Reis A, Carlos, Gomes J C, Loguercio A D, Calixto A L. Regional bond strength to root canal dentin of fiber posts luted with three cementation system. Braz Dent J 2011; 22(6):460-467.
  2. Balbosh A, Kern M. Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass-fiber endodontic posts. J Prothet Dent 2006; 95:218-23.
  3. Shori D, Pandey S, Kubde R, Rathod Y, Atara R, Rathi S. To evaluate and compare the effect of different post surface treatments on the tensile bond strength between fiber posts and composite resin. J Int Oral Health. 2013 Oct; 5(5): 27?32.
  4. Arslan H, Kurklu D, Ayrancı L B, Barutcigil C, Yılmaz C B, Karatas E, Topcouglu H S. Effects of post surface treatments including Er:YAG laser with different parameters on the pull-out bond strength of the fiber posts. J Lasers Med Sci 2014 Sep; 29(5):1569-1574.
  5. Calixto L R, Bandeca M C, Clavijo V, Andrade M F, Vaz L G, Campos E A. Effect of resin cement system and root region on the push out bond strength of a translucent system. J OperDent? 2012;37 (1),80-86.
  6. Gaston B A, West L A, Liewehr F R, Fernades C, Pashley D H. Evaluation of regional bond strength of resin cement to endodontic surfaces. J Endod 2001; May 27(5):321-324.
  7. Pest B L, Cavalli G, Bertani P, Gagliani M. Adhesive post endodontic restorations with fiber posts: push out tests and SEM observation. J Dent Mater. 2002; 18:596-602.
  8. Furuya Y, Huang SH, Takeda Y, Fok A, Hayashi M. Fracture strength and stress distributions of pulpless premolars restored with fiber posts. J Dent mater. 2014 Nov 28;33(6):852.
  9. Graiff L, Rasera L, Calabrese M, Vigolo P. Bonding effectiveness of two adhesive luting cements to glass fiber posts: pull-out evaluation of three different post surface conditioning methods..Int J Dent.2014 1-8
  10. Aggarwal R, Gupta S, Tandan A, Gupta NK, Dwivedi R, Aggarwal R. Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of various post systems using different luting agents under tangential loadingJ Oral BiolCraniofac Res. 2013 May 1;3(2):63-7.
  11. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Hanson EC. Retention of endodontic dowels: effects of cement, dowel length, diameter, and design. J Prosthet Dent 1978 Apr;39(4):400-5.
  12. Purton DG, Love RM, Chandler NP. Rigidity and retention of ceramic root canal posts. J Operat dentistry. 2000 May 1;25(3):223-7.
  13. Qualtrough AJ, Chandler NP, Purton DG.A comparison of the retention of tooth-colored posts. J Res Dent 2003 Mar 1;34(3).
  14. Mallmann A, Jacques LB, Valandro LF, Muench A. Microtensile bond strength of photoactivated and autopolymerized adhesive systems to root dentin using translucent and opaque fiber-reinforced composite posts. J prosthet? 2007 Mar 1;97(3):165-72.
  15. Bonchev A, Radeva E, Tsvetanova N. Fiber Reinforced Composite Posts?A Review of Literature. Int J Sci Res 2017;6(10):1887-93.
  16. Choi Y, Pae A, Park EJ, Wright RF. The effect of surface treatment of fiber-reinforced posts on adhesion of a resin-based luting agent. J Prosthet Dent 2010 Jun 1;103(6):362-8.
  17. Valdivia AD, Novais VR, Menezes MD, Roscoe MG, Estrela C, Soares CJ. Effect of surface treatment of fiberglass posts on bond strength to root dentin. Braz Dent J 2014;25(4):314-20.
  18. AktemurT?rker S, Uzunoğlu E, Yılmaz Z. Effects of dentin moisture on the push-out bond strength of a fiber post luted with different self-adhesive resin cements. Restor Dent Endod 2013 Nov 1;38(4):234-40.
  19. Kurt M, G?ler AU, Duran İ, Uludamar A, İnan ?. Effects of different surface treatments on the bond strength of glass fiber-reinforced composite root canal posts to composite core material. J Oral Sci 2012 Mar 1;7(1):20-5.
  20. Mosharraf R, Ranjbarian P. Effects of post surface conditioning before silanization on bond strength between fiber post and resin cement. J AdvProsthodont 2013 May 1;5(2):126-32.
  21. Poplai G, Jadhav S, Hegde V. Surface analysis of glass fiber posts after pretreatment ER: YAG laser: An SEM study. J Dent Lase. 2013 Jul 1;7(2):72.
  22. Er ?, Kılı? K, Kılın? Hİ, Aslan T, Sağsen B. Evaluation of the resin cement thicknesses and push-out bond strengths of circular and oval fiber posts in oval-shapes canals. J AdvProsthodont 2015 Feb 1;7(1):15-20.
  23. Kalkan M, Usumez A, Ozturk AN, Belli S, Eskitascioglu G. Bond strength between root dentin and three glass-fiber post systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Jul 1;96(1):41-6.
  24. C, Grandini. S, Bossu. M, Bertelli. E and Ferrari. M. Laboratory assessment of the retentive potential of adhesive posts. J Dent. 2007 Nov;35(11):827-35. 2007 Sep 4.
  25. K, Priehn. K, Martus. P and Kielbassa. A. M. In- vitro evaluation of push out bond strengths of various luting agents to tooth colored posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Apr;95(4):302-10.
  26. Yahya NA. Effect of luting cement to push-out bond strength of fibre reinforced post. IntEndod J 2018 Jun 30;15(1):11-9.
  27. Das AK, Muddugangadhar BC, Amarnath GS, Garg A, Kumar U, Rao TP. Comparative evaluation of push out bond strength of a fiber post system using four different resin cements: An in-vitro study. Journal of international oral health:J Int Oral Health . 2015;7(Suppl 1):62.
  28. Kırmalı ?, ?st?n ?, Kapdan A, Kuştarcı A. Evaluation of Various Pretreatments to Fiber Post on the Push-out Bond Strength of Root Canal Dentin. J Endod 2017 Jul 1;43(7):1180-5.

[Nila S Das, Rupesh P L, Bharat Kataraki, Basavaraj S Salagundi,Unni Pympallil, Arundati N. Raj and Vaishnavi Gowda. (2019); EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF THE TENSILE BOND STRENGTH OF TWO DIFFERENT LUTING AGENTS ON AN ENDODONTIC FIBER POST AFTER TWO DIFFERENT SURFACE TREATMENTS - AN IN VITRO STUDY. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 7 (Mar). 1201-1226] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Nila S Das
MDS,3rd Year postgraduate, Coorg Institute of Dental Sciences

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/8754      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/8754

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 30 | No. of Views: 127