Vol. 7 (02) pp. 549-556 DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/8518

KNOWLEDGE DONATING & COLLECTING ACTIVITIES AMONGST MULTI-GENERATIONAL FACULTY MEMBERS.

  • Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture Technology & Sciences, Allahabad (U.P.), India.
15 Downloads 102 Views
Crossref

Abstract

Indian Higher Education sector now encompasses three generation faculty members. With advancement in the global business scenario education system reforms to deal with this dynamic situation is the need of the hour. All the business corporations are designing their strategies to tackle the problems related to generational workforce and extract maximum talent from different generation workforce. In this line higher education also needs to inline their interest in generational issues of faculty members. One of the issues dealt in this paper is sharing knowledge amongst different generations since all the generation have their characteristic differences so their knowledge giving and knowledge taking behavior and frequency also differs. The data collected from different universities and colleges of Allahabad and Lucknow revealed that the three generations are different in knowledge donation and knowledge collection. The frequency of the activities was also measured and was found that it was different within the university or college as compared to outside the institution. Generation Y were more active outside their university/college and on the other hand Generation X were more active in their university/college. Further Baby boomers showed the minimal difference in knowledge activities within and outside the university/ college. It was suggested that light interaction amongst all the generation will help to foster a work culture where the flow of knowledge donation and collection can take place.

Keywords

Article Analytics

References

  1. Austin, A. E. (2016). Preparing the Next Generation of Faculty. The Journal of Higher Education, 73 (1: The Faculty in the New Millennium), 94-122.
  2. Bhusry, M., & Ranjan, J. (2012). Enhancing the teaching‐learning process: a knowledge management approach. International Journal of Educational Management, 313-329.
  3. Chen, C.-J. (2010, May). To give or to receive? Factors influencing members? knowledge sharing and community promotion in professional virtual common. Information and Management, 226-236.
  4. Ding, C. Q., &Xue, J. (2015). Research on Tacit Knowledge-Sharing Willingness in. International Conference of Electrical, Automation and Mechanical Engineering (EAME 2015) (pp. 553-556). Nanjing, China: Atlantis Press.
  5. Dumey, J. C., &Garletti, A. (2015). Public sector knowledge management: A structured literature review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19 (3), 530-558.
  6. Frolich, N., &Stensaker, B. (2010). Student recruitment strategies in higher education: promoting excellence and diversity? International Journal of Educational Management, 24 (4), 359-370.
  7. Gho, S. C. (2002). Managing effective knowledge transfer: an integrative framework and some practice implications. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6 (1), 23-30.
  8. Holste, J. S. (2009). Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14 (1), 128-140.
  9. Husseini, S. A., &Elbeltagi, I. (2015). Knowledge Sharing Practices as a Basis of Product. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 5, 182-185.
  10. Johnson, S. A., &Romenallo, M. N. (2005). Generational Diversity: Teaching and Learning Approaches. Nurse Educator, 30 (5), 212-216.
  11. Kamasak, R. (2010). The influence of knowledge sharing on innovation. European Business Review, 22 (3), 306-317.
  12. Landoli, L., &Quinto, I. (2012). A debate dashboard to enhance online knowledge sharing. VINE , 42 (1), 67-93.
  13. Lin, H. F. (2007). Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study. International Journal of Manpower, 28 (4), 315-332.
  14. Mansor, Z. D., &Mustaffa, M. (2015). Motivation and Willingness to Participate in Knowledge Sharing Activities Among Academics in a Public University. INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING AND BUSINESS CONFERENCE IABC (pp. 286-293). Putra Malaysia: Elsevier.
  15. Susanty, A. I., & Wood, D. C. (2011). THE MOTIVATION TO SHARE KNOWLEDGE OF THE EMPLOYEES. International Conference on Social Science and Humanity IPEDR (pp. 159-162). Singapore: IACSIT Press.
  16. Tessie H.H. Herbst, P. D. (2011). Leadership effectiveness in Higher Education: Managerial self-perceptions versus perceptions of others. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 14 pages.
  17. Vries, R. E., & Hoff, B. V. (2006). Explaining Knowledge Sharing The Role of Team Communication Styles, Job Satisfaction, and Performance Beliefs. Communication Research, 115-135.
  18. Zaquot, F., & Abbas, M. (2012). Towards a model for understanding the influence of the factors that stimulate university students' engagement and performance in knowledge sharing. Library Review, 61 (5), 345-361.

How to Cite This Article

Priyanka Saxena and Ranjan A. John. (2019); KNOWLEDGE DONATING & COLLECTING ACTIVITIES AMONGST MULTI-GENERATIONAL FACULTY MEMBERS., Int. J. of Adv. Res., 7 (02), 549-556, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/8518

Corresponding Author

PRIYANKA SAXENA
Assistant Professor Joseph School of Business Studies & Commerce Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology & Sciences