22Feb 2019

AUTHORITY OF GOVERNMENT IN TRUST AND COMPLIANCE OF TAXPAYERS: THE THEORY OF SLIPPERY SLOPE.

  • STIM Publik Makassar, Indonesia.
  • Faculty Of Economy, University Hasanuddin Makassar, Indonesia.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Self-assessment system is a tax collection system that gives credence to the taxpayer to calculate, pay, and self-reported the amount of tax owed should have been based on legislation applicable tax. This study aims to analyze and determine the effect of the authority of the authority (authority) of tax and the trust of taxpayers directly and indirectly on taxpayer compliance at the Makassar Middle Tax Office with taxpayer trust as a moderating variable. This study uses 96 effective taxpayers in 2017 at the Makassar Middle Tax Office as a unit of research analysis. By using regression analysis, the results of this study show that government authority and trust in taxpayers have a positive effect on taxpayer compliance at the Makassar Middle Tax Office and the trustworthiness of taxpayers is able to moderate the relationship between government authorities and taxpayer compliance.

  1. Alm, James; Roy Bahl: Matthew N. Murray, 1990. Tax Structure and Tax Compliance. The Review of Economics and Statistics. Vol. 72, No. 4. (November), pp. 603-613.
  2. Allingham, M.G. and Sandmo, A. 1972. Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis. Journal of Public Economics 1 (3) pp. 323-338.
  3. 2013. Trust and Power in Government Authority as Determinants of Tax Compliance Levels and Tax Evasion: Testing Assumptions for the Slippery Slope Framework. , Riau University.
  4. Bradley, Cassie Francies. 1994. An Empirical Investigation of Factor Affecting Corporate Tax Compliance Behavior. Dissertation. The University of Alabama, USA.
  5. Carroll, J. S. 1978. A psychological approach to deterrence: The evaluation of crime opportunities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1512-1520.
  6. Cahyono, Yuli Tri. 2017. Analysis of Factors Affecting Tax Receipts (Empirical Study in Surakarta Pratama Tax Service Office). Indonesian Accounting and Financial Research, 2 (2), 2017. Pages 163-175.
  7. Dewi, Olivia, and RetnaningtyasWiduri. 2013. "Factors that influence the success of local tax revenues in the city of Tarakan." Journal of Economics No. 2, Vol 3.
  8. Frey, B. S. 1997. Not just for the money: An economic theory of personal motivation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  9. Feld, L. P., and Frey, B. S. 2007. Tax compliance as a result of a psychological tax contract: The role of incentives and responsive regulation. Journal Law and Policy, 29, 102?120.
  10. Gangl, K., Hofmann, E., Pollai, M., and Kirchler, E. 2012. The dynamics of power and trust in the Slippery Slope Framework and its impact on the tax climate.
  11. Gunadi, 2002. Indonesian Taxation 2002; A Reference Guide. Jakarta: Multi Utama Publishing.
  12. Judge, Zulkarnain, LilikHandajani, and BianaAdhaInapty. 2017. Hospitality Company Taxpayer Voluntary Tax Compliance: Determinants, Trust and Legitimacy Power. Journal of Accounting / Volume XXI, No. 02, May 2017: 253-277.
  13. Hofmann, Eva, Katharina, G., Erich, K., and. Jennifer, S. 2014. "Enhancing Tax Compliance Through Coercive And Legitimate Power of Tax Authorities by Concurrently Finishing or Facilitating Trust In Tax Authorities". Law and Policy, 36 (3).
  14. Hoy, W.K. and Tarter, C.J. 2004. Organizational justice in schools: no justice without trust. International Journal of Educational Management; 18 (4): 250-259.
  15. 2011. Taxation. Yogyakarta: Andi.
  16. Kastlunger, B., Edoardo, L., Erich, K., and Alfred, S. 2013 "Powerful Authorities And Trusting Citizens: The Slippery Slope Framework and Tax Compliance in Italy". Journal Of Economic Psychology, 34, 36-45.
  17. Kim, E., and Tadisina, S., 2003. Customer's Initial Trust in E-Business: How to Measure Customer's Initial Trust, Proceedings of the Ninth Americas Conference on Information Systems, pp. 35-41.
  18. Kirchler, E., Erik H., and Ingrid W. 2008. "Enforced Versus Tax Compliance Voluntary: The" Slippery Slope "Framework". Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 210-225.
  19. Kogler C, Batrancea L, Nichita A, Jozsef P d, Alexis B e, Kirchler E. 2013. Journal of Economic Psychology 34 (2013) 169?180 2013. The trust and power of tax compliance: Testing of assumptions of the slippery slope framework in Austria, Hungary, Romania, and Russia.
  20. Outside, Pin. andHsin-Hui Lin. 2003. A customer Loyalty Model for E-Service Context. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 4: 156 ? 167.
  21. Lohmoller JB. 1989. Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares. (Physica, Heidelberg.).
  22. Mulder, L. B., van Dijk, E., De Cremer, D., and Wilke, H. A. M. 2006. Undermining trust and cooperation: The paradox of sanctioning systems in social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 147?162.
  23. Mulder, L. B., Verboon, P., and De Cremer, D. 2009. Sanctions and moral judgment: The moderating effect of sanction severity and trust in authorities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 255?269.
  24. Mayer, R.C., Davis, J. H., and Schoorman, F. D., 1995. An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust, Academy of Management Review, 30 (3): 709-734.
  25. Osman Fatih and ErenCaskurlu. 2011. Tax Amnesty with Effects and Effecting Aspects: Tax Compliance, Tax Audits, and Enforcement Around; The Turkish Case. International Journal of Business and Social Science. Vol. 2 No. 7. Page. 95-105.
  26. Pratomo, Aloysius Brian. 2014. Influence of Awareness, Knowledge, Perception, Level of Trust in Willing to Pay Taxes: A Case Study of Personal Taxpayers at Pratama Tax Service Office (KPP), East Semarang. Abstract Pg.1-13.
  27. Purnamasari, Apriani, Sukirman, and UmiPratiwi. 2016. Effects of Understanding, Tax Sanctions, Government Trust and Legal Levels, and Nationalism on Compliance with Taxpayers in Paying PBB-P2 (Study on PBB-P2 Taxpayers in Banjar City, West Java). National Symposium on Accounting XIX. Lampung.
  28. Ratmono, Dwi and Cahyonowati, Nur. 2013. Trust in the Tax Authorities as Moderating the Effects of Deterrence Factors on Compliance with Personal Taxpayers. Indonesian Accounting Journal, Vol. 2 No. January 1, 2013, page 1-15.
  29. Ratmono, Dwi. 2015. Efforts to Improve Personal Taxpayer Compliance: Explanation of the Economy Slippery Slope. Bulletin Theory, 13 (1). pp. 59-79.
  30. Robbin, Stephen, P., and Timothy, A.J. 2007. Organizational Behavior. Book 2 Edition 12. SalembaEmpat: Jakarta.
  31. RusdiHidayat, Suhadak, Darminto. 2014. Model of Service Quality Measurement, Regional Tax Regulations, Taxpayer Satisfaction Level, Behavior and Compliance Using Confirmator Factor Analysis. World Applied Sciences Journal 29 (1): 56-61, 2014. Brawijaya University, Indonesia Malang.
  32. Sari, Maria M. Ratna, and Ni Nyoman Afriyanti.2012. "The Influence of Taxpayer Compliance and Tax Examination on Receipt of PPH Article 25/29 Corporate Taxpayers in East Denpasar Primary KPP." No 1, Vol 7.
  33. Scholz, John, T danLubell, M.1998.Adaptive Political Attitude: Duty, Trust, and Fear as Monitors of Tax Policy.American Journal of Political Science.42, 398-417.
  34. Sellywati, MohdFaizal, Mohd Rizal Palil, RuhanitaMaelahdan 2017. Perception on justice, trust and tax compliance behavior inMalaysia.
  35. Stefanos A. Tsikas. 2017. Enforce Tax Compliance, but Cautiously: The Role of Trust in Authorities and Power of Authorities. Hannover Economic Papers (HEP) No. 589 March 2017. Leibniz University Hannover, School of Economics and Management, RTG 1723 ?Globalization and Development?, KoenigswortherPlatz 1, D-30167 Hannover, Germany.
  36. Tenbrunsel, A. E., danMessick, D. M. 1999. Sanctioning systems, decision frames, and cooperation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 684?707.
  37. Torgler, Bennodan Schneider, F.2004.Attitudes towards paying taxes in Austria: An empirical analysis.Paper Working Yale Centre for InternasionalAnd Area Studies, Leitner Program in Internasional and Comparative Political Economy.
  38. Verboon, P dan van Dijke, M. 2011. When do severe sanctions enhance compliance? The role of procedural fairness. Journal of Economic Psychology 32 pp 120?130.
  39. Wenzel, M. 2004. The social side of sanctions: Personal and social norms as moderators of deterrence. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 547?567.
  40. Wijayanti, DiahWahyu, and Noer, Sasongko. 2017. Effects of Understanding, Tax Sanctions, Government's Level of Trust and Law on Compliance in Paying Taxpayers (Taxpayer Study on Communities in Pajang Sub-District, Laweyan Surakarta District). National Seminar and The 4th Call for Sharia Paper Accounting Professional Roles in Corruption Management. Pages 308-326. ISSN 2460-0784.
  41. Yousafzai, S. Y., Pallister, J. G., danFoxall, G. R., 2003. A Proposed Model of ETrust for Electronic Banking, Technovation, 23: 847-860.
  42. Wold, H. Partial East Square. In S Kotz and NL.Johnson (Eds).1985.Encyclopedia of Statistic Science, Vol.8...pp 587-599, New York, Wiley.

[Irawati.HM, Muhammad Ali, Yohanis Rura and Arifuddin. (2019); AUTHORITY OF GOVERNMENT IN TRUST AND COMPLIANCE OF TAXPAYERS: THE THEORY OF SLIPPERY SLOPE. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 7 (Feb). 719-731] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

IRAWATI HM
STIM PUBLIK MAKASSAR

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/8539      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/8539

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 16 | No. of Views: 53