22Feb 2019

EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF SHEAR BOND STRENGTHS OF TWO CERAMIC REPAIR SYSTEMS AFTER TWO DIFFERENT SURFACE TREATMENTS - AN INVITRO STUDY.

Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Objective: To evaluate and compare shear bond strength of two intra oral ceramic repair systems on metal substrate and ceramic substrate and to compare among groups to assess a better ceramic repair system after acid etching and laser surface treatment. Methodology: 40 Nickel chromium and 40 feldspathic ceramic specimens were fabricated and divided into two main groups which were further subdivided into four subgroups based on the repair systems used and surface treatments, which had ten specimens each. Hydrofluoric acid and Erbium-doped Yttrium aluminium garnet laser were used as surface treatments and two intra oral repair systems used were Bisco and Angelus. Bonded specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 hours before being thermocycled at 5?C to 55?C for 300 cycles with a 30-second dwell time. The specimens were stored for an additional 7 days before being subjected to shear force in a universal testing machine with a 10KN load cell at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The bond strength values obtained were recorded in MPa and analyzed using independent t test. Results: The shear bond strength values obtained were highly significant for Bisco when compared to Angelus for both the metal and ceramic substrates. Similarly after acid etching and laser surface treatment, Bisco proved to be better. Conclusion:Bisco repair system had significantly higher shear bond strength values when compared to Angelus. Hence it is the preferred choice for intraoral repair of fractured metal ceramic restorations. Er: YAG laser surface treatment is the recommended surface treatment for intraoral repair.

  1. Aslam A, Khan DA, Hassan SH, Ahmed B. Ceramic fracture in metal-ceramic restorations: the aetiology. Dental update. 2017 May 2;44(5):448-56.
  2. Jain S, Parkash H, Gupta S and Bhargava A. To Evaluate the Effect of Various Surface Treatments on the Shear Bond Strength of Three Different Intraoral Ceramic Repair Systems: An in Vitro Study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013 July ? Sep;13(3):315?20.
  3. Gasthi A, Chakravarthy AK, Kumar BM. Evaluation of shear bond strength and microleakage of two repair systems for porcelain fused metal restoration. J NTR Univ Health Sci. 2013 Jan 1;2(1):36-47.
  4. Yoo JY, Yoon HI, Park JM, Park EJ. Porcelain repair-Influence of different systems and surface treatments on resin bond strength. J AdvProsthodont. 2015 Oct 1;7(5):343-8.
  5. Dos Santos JG, Fonseca RG, Adabo GL and dos Santos Cruz CA. To Evaluate the Shear Bond Strength of Metal Ceramic Repair Systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Sep;96(3):165-73.
  6. Al-Moaleem MM, Al-Ahmari NM, Al-Dosari MK, Abdulla HA. Repairing of fractured metal ceramic restorations: techniques review. Int J Contemp Dent. 2013 Apr 16;4(1):21-30.
  7. Kosmas Tolidis, Paris Gerasimou, Christina Boutsiouki. Intraoral Ceramic Restoration Repair Techniques: Report of 3 Cases. Balk J Stom. 2012;16:103-8.
  8. Karcı M, Demir N, Subaşı MG, G?kkaya M. Shear bond strength of a novel porcelain repair system for different computer‑aided design/computer‑assisted manufacturing ceramic materials. Niger J ClinPract. 2018;21(4):507-13.
  9. Kalra A, Mohan MS and Gowda EM. Comparison of shear bond strength of two porcelain repair systems after different surface treatment. ContempClin Dent. 2015 Apr-Jun;6(2):196-200.
  10. Haselton DR, Diaz-Arnold AM and Dunne JT. Shear bond strengths of 2 intraoral porcelain repair systems to porcelain or metal substrates. J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Nov;86(5):526-31.
  11. Gourav R, Ariga P, Jain AR and Philip JM. Effect of four different surface treatments on shear bond strength of three porcelain repair systems: An in vitro study. J Cons Dent. 2013 May-Jun;16(3):208-12.
  12. Blum IR, Nikolakakos N, Lynch CD, Wilson N, Millar BJ, Jagger DC. An invitro comparison of four intra oral ceramic repair systems. J Dent. 2012 Nov;40(11):906-12.
  13. Kocaagaoglu HH and Gurbulak A. An assessment of shear bond strength between ceramic repair systems and different ceramic infrastructures. Scanning. 2015 Jul-Aug;37(4):300-5.
  14. Kocaagaoglu H, Manav T and Albayrak H. In Vitro Comparison of the Bond Strength between Ceramic Repair Systems and Ceramic Materials and Evaluation of the Wettability. J Prosthodont. 2015 Nov;2:1?7.
  15. Han IH, Kang DW, Chung CH, Choe HC and Son MK. Effect of various intraoral repair systems on the shear bond strength of composite resin to zirconia. J AdvProsthodont. 2013;5:248-55,
  16. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Sindel J. Repair strength of etched vs silica-coated metal-ceramic and all-ceramic restorations. Oper Dent. 2000 May 1;25(3):209-15.
  17. Kumbuloglu O, User A, Toskavul S, Valittu P K. Intraoral adhesive systems for ceramic repairs: A comparison. ActaOdontol Scand. 2003 July;61:268-72.
  18. ?zcan M, Van Der Sleen JM, Kurunm?ki H, Vallittu PK. Comparison of repair methods for ceramic‐fused‐to‐metal crowns. J Prosthodont. 2006 Sep; 15(5):283-8.
  19. Hakimaneh S M R, SayedShayegh S, Lahiji M, Chokr A, &Moraditalab A. Effect of silane heat treatment by laser on the bond strength of a repair composite to feldspathic porcelain. J Prosthodont. 2018 Jan;00:1?7.
  20. Dilber E, Yavuz T, Kara HB, Ozturk AN. Comparison of the effects of surface treatments on roughness of two ceramic systems. Photomed Laser Surg. 2012 Jun 1;30(6):308-14.
  21. Wahab MH, Bakar WZ, Husein A. Different surface preparation techniques of porcelain repaired with composite resin and fracture resistance. J Conserv Dent. 2011 Oct;14(4):387-90.
  22. Raposo LH, Neiva NA, Silva GR, Carlo HL, Mota AS, Prado CJ, Soares CJ. Ceramic restoration repair: report of two cases. J App Oral Sci. 2009 Apr; 17(2):140-4.
  23. Agingu C, Zhang C, Jiang N, Cheng H, ?zcan M & Yu H. Intraoral repair of chipped or fractured veneered zirconia crowns and fixed dental prosthesis: clinical guidelines based on literature review. J Adhesion Sci Technol. 2018 Feb;32(15):1711-23.
  24. Ataol AS and Ergun G. Repair bond strength of resin composite to bilayer dental ceramics. J AdvProsthodont. 2018 Apr;10(2):101-12.
  25. Garc?a-Sanz V, Paredes-Gallardo V, Mendoza-Yero O, Carbonell-Leal M, Albaladejo A, Montiel-Company JM et al. The effects of lasers on bond strength to ceramic materials: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018 Jan 2;13(1):1-30.
  26. Tinastepe N, Turkes E, Kazazoglu E. Comparative approach to analyse the effects of different surface treatments on CAD/CAM resin nanoceramics?resin composite repair bond strength. BiotechnolBiotechnol Equip. 2018 Jan 2;32(1):142-9.
  27. Ahmadzadeh A, Ghasemi Z, Panahandeh N, Golmohammadi F, Kavyanie A. Effect of silane on shear bond strength of two porcelain repair systems. J Dent Sch. 2016 Jan 6;34(1):5-9.
  28. Ozel GS, Inan O. Comparison of the Shear Bond Strength of Three Different Composite Materials to Metal and Ceramic Surfaces. Inter J Compos Mat 2016;6(4):121-8.
  29. Kirmali O, Kapdan A, Harorli OT, Barutcugil C, Ozarslan MM. Efficacy of ceramic repair material on the bond strength of composite resin to zirconia ceramic. ActaOdontol Scand. 2015 Jan 2;73(1):28-32.
  30. Wady AF, Paleari AG, Queiroz TP, Margonar R. Repair technique for fractured implant-supported metal-ceramic restorations: a clinical report. J Oral Implantol. 2014 Oct;40(5):589-92.
  31. Li R, Sun YC, Wang C, Gao P. Bonding of an opaque resin to silane-treated porcelain. J Biomed Mater Eng. 2014 Jan 1;24(6):2117-25.
  32. Subaşı G, İnan ?. Shear Bond Strength of Three Porcelain Repair Systems on Porcelain in Dry and Aged Conditions. Dentistry. 2012;2(119):1-7.
  33. Luthra RP, Gupta R. Lasers in Prosthetic Dentistry: A Review. Indian J Dent Sci. 2011 Sep 1;3(3):41-43.
  34. Fahmy NZ, Mohsen CA. Assessment of an indirect metal ceramic repair system. J Prosthodont. 2010 Jan;19(1):25-32.
  35. Haneda IG, de Almeida-Junior AA, Fonseca RG, Adabo GL. Intraoral repair in metal-ceramic prostheses: a clinical report. Rev. OdontolUniv S?o Paulo. 2017 Dec 14;21(3):282-7.
  36. Reston EG, Filho SC, Arossi G, Cogo RB, Rocha CS, Closs LQ. Repairing ceramic restorations: final solution or alternative procedure? Oper Dent. 2008 Jul;33(4):461-6.
  37. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Mar 1;89(3):268-74.
  38. ?zcan M, Niedermeier W. Clinical study on the reasons for and location of failures of metal-ceramic restorations and survival of repairs. Int J Prosthodont. 2002 May 1;15(3):299-302.
  39. Chadwick RG, Mason AG, Sharp W. Attempted evaluation of three porcelain repair systems - what are we really testing? J Oral Rehabil. 1998 Aug;25(8):610-15.
  40. Shahverdi S, Canay S, S?ahin E, Bilge A. Effects of different surface treatment methods on the bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. J Oral Rehabil. 1998 Sep;25(9):699-705.
  41. Appeldoorn RE, Wilwerding TM, Barkmeier WW. Bond strength of composite resin to porcelain with newer generation porcelain repair systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1993 Jul 1;70(1):6-11.
  42. Rada RE. Intraoral repair of metal ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1991 Mar 1;65(3):348-50.
  43. Eliasson A, Arnelund CF, Johansson A. A clinical evaluation of cobalt-chromium metal-ceramic fixed partial dentures and crowns: A three-to seven-year retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Jul 1;98(1):6-16.
  44. Sadeghi M, Davari A, Mahani AA, Hakimi H. Influence of different power outputs of Er: YAG laser on shear bond strength of a resin composite to feldspathic porcelain. J Dent. 2015 Mar;16(1):30.
  45. Kunt GE, G?ler AU, Ceylan G, Duran İ, ?zkan P, Kirtiloğlu T. Effects of Er: YAG laser treatments on surface roughness of base metal alloys. Lasers Med Sci. 2012 Jan 1;27(1):47-51.
  46. Hemadri M, Saritha G, Rajasekhar V, Pachlag KA, Purushotham R, Reddy VK. Shear bond strength of repaired composites using surface treatments and repair materials: An in vitro Study. J Int Oral Health. 2014 Nov;6(6):22-25.

[Vaishnavi.R, Basavaraj S Salagundi, Rupesh P L, Bharat Kataraki, Sapna C Kambiranda and Gayathri Krishnamoorthy. (2019); EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF SHEAR BOND STRENGTHS OF TWO CERAMIC REPAIR SYSTEMS AFTER TWO DIFFERENT SURFACE TREATMENTS - AN INVITRO STUDY. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 7 (Feb). 732-743] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Vaishnavi.R
COORG INSTITUTE OF DENTAL SCIENCES

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/8540      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/8540

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 64 | No. of Views: 218