10Apr 2019

COMPARISON OF POSTEROLATERAL AND LATERAL APPROACH FOR TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT IN AVASCULAR NECROSIS OF FEMORAL HEAD: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF 46 CASES.

  • Department of Orthopedics, First affiliated Hospital of Jiamusi University, Jiamusi, China.
  • Department of Human antomy and histoembryology. First affiliated Hospital of Jiamusi University, China.
  • Department of Orthopedics, Alkair Hospital, Kabul, Afghanistan.
  • Department of Pediatrics, First affiliated Hospital of Jiamusi University, Jiamusi, China.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Aim: A retrospective study was conducted to compare the lateral approach and posterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty in term of the Harris hip score, duration of surgery, length of incision and blood loss. Methods: The study were done totally on 46 patients aged between 42 to 80 years. 23 patients were operated through the direct lateral hardinge approach while the other 23 patients were operated through the posterolateral approach. Those patients were operated in between years of 2012 to 2017 in the first Jiamusi university hospital. The data were collected from the medical records of the patients and direct contact with them. The collected data were analyzed with Spss 21.0 version software. The Chi-square test was used to make the comparison between the two groups. Results: There was no significant difference in age, gender, duration of surgery, blood loss and size of incision. The p-value was greater than the ? = 0.05. However, there was significantly difference in Harris hip score between both groups and the p value was 0,043which is statistically significantly difference between the two groups. Conclusion: In our study, patients treated with direct lateral approach had a better postoperative outcome with less complication than the patients treated with a standard posterolateral approach.

  1. Baba T, Homma Y, Takazawa N, Kobayashi H, Matsumoto M, Aritomi K, et al. Is urinary incontinence the hidden secret complications after total hip arthroplasty? Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014; 24(8):1455?60. 40.
  2. Tamaki T, Oinuma K, Shiratsuchi H, Akita K, Iida S. Hip dysfunction-related urinary incontinence: a prospective analysis of 189 female patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Int J Urol. 2014; 21(7):729?31.
  3. Hardinge K. The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1982; 64:17-9.
  4. This approach provides adequate exposure of both the proximal femur and acetabulum.12 Hoppenfeld S, DeBoer P, Buckley R. Surgical exposures in orthopaedics: the anatomic approach. Philidelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2009.
  5. Masonis JL, Bourne R. Surgical approach, abductor function, and total hip arthroplasty dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;405:46-53.
  6. Hoppenfeld S, De Boer P. The hip. In:  Surgical exposures in orthopaedics.  Philadelphia: Lippincott-Haven; 1984.  p.301?56.
  7. Afonso MAR, Franco JS, Cabral FJP, D?Angelo MD, Alves FRV. 2008
  8. Svenson O, Sk?ld S, Blomgen G.  Integrity of the gluteus medium after the transgluteal approach in total hip arthroplasty.  J Arthroplasty. 1990; 5:57-60.
  9. Ritter MA, Harty LD, Keating ME, Faris PM, Meding JB.  A clinical comparison of the anterolateral and posterolateral approaches to the hip.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; 385:95-99.
  10. Amlie E, Havelin LI, Furnes O, Baste V, Nordsletten L, Hovik O, et al. Worse patient-reported outcome after lateral approach than after anterior and posterolateral approach in primary hip arthroplasty. A cross-sectional questionnaire
  11. Rami Madanat & Tatu J. M?kinen & Mikko T. Ovaska & Martti Soiva & Tero Vahlberg & Jussi Haapala
  12. Enocson A, Tidermark J, T?rnkvist H, Lapidus LJ (2008) Dislocation of hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fracture: better outcome after the anterolateral approach in a prospective cohort study on 739 consecutive hips. Acta Orthop 79:211?217
  13. Pajarinen J, Savolainen V, Tulikoura I, Lindahl J, Hirvensalo E (2003) Factors predisposing to dislocation of the Thompson hemiarthroplasty. Acta Orthop 74:45?48
  14. Keene GS, Parker MJ (1993) Hemiarthroplasty of the hip ? the anterior or posterior approach? A comparison of surgical approaches. Injury 24:611?613
  15. Bush JB, Wilson MR (2007) Dislocation after hip hemiarthroplasty: anterior versus posterior capsular approach. Orthopedics 30:138?144
  16. Suh KT, Park BG, Choi YJ (2004) A posterior approach to primary hip arthroplasty with soft tissue repair. Clin Orthop 418:162?167
  17. Ko CK, Law SW, Chiu KH (2001) Enhanced soft tissue repair using locking loop stich after posterior approach for hip hemiarthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 16:207?211
  18. Ramesh M, O?Byrne JM, McCarthy N, Jarvis A, Mahalingham K, Cashman WF (1996) Damage to the superior glutal nerve after the Hardinge approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:903?906
  19. Anders Enocson & Carl Johan Hedbeck & Hans T?rnkvist & Jan Tidermark & Lasse J. Lapidus
  20. Woo RY, Morrey BF (1982) Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 64:1295?1306
  21. Biedermann R, Tonin A, Krismer M, Rachbauer F, Eibl G, Stockl B (2005) Reducing the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: the effect of orientation of the acetabular component. J Bone Jt Surg Br 87:762?769
  22. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR (1978) Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Jt Surg Am 60:217?220
  23. Dorr LD, Wan Z (1998) Causes of and treatment protocol for instability of total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 144? 151
  24. Adrian e. Weale, piers newman, ian t. Ferguson, gordon c. Bannister
  25. Margot van der Grinten*?, Max Reijman?, Frans C van Biezen? and Jan AN Verhaar?
  26. Kurtz, S, Ong, K, Lau, E, Mowat, F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(4):780785
  27. 2013.Nationalhospitaldischarge survey: 2010 table, procedures by selected patient characteristics. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
  28. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. 2007. Projections of primaryandrevisionhipandkneearthroplastyintheUnitedStatesfrom 2005 to 2030. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 89:780?785.
  29. Einar Amlie, Leif I Havelin, Ove Furnes, Valborg Baste, Lars Nordsletten, Oystein Hovik & Sigbjorn Dimmen.Worse patient-reported outcome after lateral approach than after anterior and posterolateral approach in primary hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthopaedica 2014; 85 (5): 463?469
  30. Nils P Hailer1, R?diger J Weiss2, Andr? Stark3, and Johan K?rrholm4. The risk of revision due to dislocation after total hip arthroplasty depends on surgical approach, femoral head size, sex, and primary diagnosis. Acta Orthopaedica 2012; 83 (5): 442
  31. Chinundorn PutananonHarit TuchindaAlisara ArirachakaranSiwadol WongsakThana NarinsorasakJatupon Kongtharvonskul. Comparison of direct anterior, lateral, posterior and posterior-2 approaches in total hip arthroplasty: network meta-analysis.Europian journal of orthopedics and traumatology ,2018
  32. W-C Witzle, L Stephan, F Krummenauer, A Neuke and K-P G?nther. Short-term outcome after posterior versus lateral surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty - a randomized clinical trial. European Journal of Medical Research2009
  33. Arthursson AJ, Furnes O, Espehaug B, Havelin LI, Soreide JA. Prosthesis survival after total hip arthroplasty?does surgical approach matter? Analysis of 19,304 Charnley and 6,002 Exeter primary total hip arthroplasties reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register . Acta Orthop. 2007
  34. McFarland B, Osborne G. Approach to the hip: a suggested improvement on Kocher?s method. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1954;36B:364-7.
  35. Hardinge K. The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1982; 64B:179.
  36. Hardinge approach to all primary hip arthroplasty which, according to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, is the standard approach to hip operations done in Norway. Primary total hip arthroplasty: a comparison of the lateral Hardinge approach to an anterior mini-invasive approach. orthopedic Reviews 2009; volume 1:e27
  37. Amlie E, Hovik O, Reikeras O. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty with 28 and 32-mm femoral head. J Orthop Traumatol 2010; 11 (2): 111-5.
  38. Bistolfi A, Crova M, Rosso F, Titolo P, Ventura S, Massazza G. Dislocation rate after hip arthroplasty within the first postoperative year: 36 mm versus 28 mm femoral heads. Hip Int 2011; 21 (5): 559-64.
  39. Ho K W, Whitwell G S, Young S K. Reducing the rate of early primary hip dislocation by combining a change in surgical technique and an increase in femoral head diameter to 36 mm. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2012; 132 (7): 1031-6.
  40. Jakob van Oldenrijk1, Piet V J M Hoogland2, Gabri?lle J M Tuijthof1, Ruby Corveleijn3, Tom W H Noordenbos2, and Matthias U Schafroth1. Soft tissue damage after minimally invasive THAA comparison of 5 approaches. Acta Orthopaedica 2010; 81 (6): 696?702
  41. Suh K T, Park B G, Choi Y J. A posterior approach to primary total hip arthroplasty with soft tissue repair. Clin Orthop 2004; (418): 162-7.
  42. Lavigne P, Loriot de Rouvray T H. The superior gluteal nerve. Anatomical study of its extrapelvic portion and surgical resolution by trans-gluteal approach. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1994; 80: 188-95.
  43. Anders Enocson1, Carl-Johan Hedbeck1, Jan Tidermark1,3, Hans Pettersson2, Sari Ponzer1, and Lasse J Lapidus1.A prospective cohort study of 713 consecutive hips. Acta Orthopaedica 2009; 80 (2): 184?189
  44. Nathan Wayne,1Reinhard Stoewe2 1Sykehuset Buskerud Vestre Viken, Drammen.Comparison between lateral approach to an anterior minimal invasive approach.Orthopedics reviews 2009
  45. Paton RW, Hirst P. Hemiarthroplasty of the hip and dislocation. Injury. 30. 1989;20(3):167-9.
  46. Ko CK, Law SW, Chiu KH. Enhanced soft tissue repair using locking loop 35. stitch after posterior approach for hip hemiarthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001; 16(2):207-11
  47. Masjudin Tumin, Kyung Soon Park, Azlina Amir Abbas and Taek Rim Yoon. Comparison of the Outcome in Bilateral Staged Total Hip Arthroplasty: Modified Two-Incision Minimally Invasive Technique versus the Conventional Posterolateral Approach
  48. Bernd Fink*, Alexander Mittelstaedt, Martin S Schulz, Pavol Sebena, Joachim Singer. Comparison of a minimally invasive posterior approach and the standard posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty A prospective and comparative study. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 2010, 5:46
  49. Bush JB, Wilson MR. Dislocation after hip hemiarthroplasty: anterior versus posterior capsular approach. Orthopedics 2007; 30: 138-144
  50. Jolles BM, Bogoch ER. Posterior versus lateral surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty in adults with osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; 19: CD003828
  51. Hardinge K. The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1982; 64: 17-19.
  52. Varley J, Parker MJ. Stability of hip hemiarthroplasties. Int Orthop 2004; 28: 274-277.
  53. Unwin AJ, Thomas M. Dislocation after hemiarthroplasty of the hip: a comparison of the dislocation rate after posterior and lateral approaches to the hip. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1994; 76: 327-329.
  54. Rogmark C, Fenstad AM, Leonardsson O, Enges?ter LB, K?rrholm J, Furnes O, Garellick G, Gjertsen JE. Posterior approach and uncemented stems increases the risk of reoperation after hemiarthroplasties in elderly hip fracture patients. Acta Orthop 2014; 85: 1825.
  55. Keene GS, Parker MJ. Hemiarthroplasty of the hip-the anterior or posterior approach? A comparison of surgical approaches. Injury 1993; 24: 611-613.
  56. Adrian e. Weale, piers newman, ian t. Ferguson, gordon c. Bannister. Nerve injury after posterior and direct lateral approaches for hip replacement. J bone joint surg [br] 1996;78-b:899-902
  57. Richard S.Snell, MD, PHD.Clinical anatomy by regions. 8th edition 2007 United State Of America
  58. tephen Kishner, MD, MHA Professor of Clinical Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Residency Program Director, Louisiana State University School of Medicine in New Orleans.Hip joint anatomy . Medscape Dec 07, 2017
  59. GS Kulkarni MS MS (Ortho) FRCS FICS Director, Professor and Head Postgraduate Institute of Swasthiyog Pratishthan Miraj, Maharashtra.volume 4.Textbook of Orthopedics and Trauma. Ajanta Press 2008
  60. Kim Bengochea, Regis University, Denver.Anatomy of the hip joint. Kenhub(2018).

[Ahmad Zaki Barati, Shi Lei, Fan Xun Qi, Zhao Jun Peng, Saraj U DDin Barati and Santosh Adhikari (2019); COMPARISON OF POSTEROLATERAL AND LATERAL APPROACH FOR TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT IN AVASCULAR NECROSIS OF FEMORAL HEAD: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF 46 CASES. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 7 (Apr). 837-843] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Shi lei
The first affiliated hospital of jiamusi university

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/8894      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/8894

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 37 | No. of Views: 108