06Mar 2019

COMMISSIONING OF FIRST STATE OF ART CLINAC DHX MEDICAL LINEAR ACCELERATOR AT SHER- I- KASHMIR INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, J&K: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DOSIMETRIC ANALYSIS.

  • Department of Radiological Physics & Bio-Engineering SKIMS, Srinagar, J&K.
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Objective: To provide a quantitative and qualitative dosimetric analysis of the results obtained while commissioning the first state of art Clinac DHX Medical Linear Accelerator at Sher- I- Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, J&K. Introduction: Radiotherapy is an important modality for cancer treatment management. Treatment of almost all the tumours of various shapes has become possible with modern radiotherapy techniques like 3DCRT, IMRT and IGRT etc. Response of radiation treatment is directly related to the precession in the delivered dose to the patient that in turn depends on the accuracy of the beam data used in the treatment planning process. This data is obtained during the commissioning of the Linear Accelerator (LINAC). The data generated thereof is used for the Treatment Planning System. Recently Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS) procured its first Medical Linear accelerator (Clinac DHX) from Varian Medical Systems and the same was commissioned successfully. This study is inclined towards the evaluation of the various machine parameters and beam data generated for the said Linear accelerator. Methodology: Various national and international protocols includingTRS-398, AAPM TG-45 and IEC 60976 were followed to obtain the beam data and other machine parameters essential for precise dose delivery to the target volume. Data was generated for both photon and electron beams. Dosimetricequipments including RFA, Ionization Chambers, electrometers and various softwares provided by IBA were used extensively to generate the data. In order to carry out the commissioning of the Eclipse (version 13.6) Planning System, the beam data was generated in accordance to requirement of Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) for photon beams and the Electron Monte Carlo (e-MC) for electron beams. Evaluation of the data was made on the basis of parameters like PDD, Dose Profiles, Flatness, Symmetry, Relative output factors, MU Linearity, Beam Quality, Collimator Transmission, Photon leakage, neutron leakage and DLG. Results and conclusion: The results obtained for all the parameters including PDD, Dose Profiles, Flatness, Symmetry, Relative output Factors, MU Linearity, Beam Quality, Collimator Transmission, Photon leakage, neutron leakage and DLG were found to be in compliance with the standards set by various national and international bodies. The machine was therefore deemed to be fit and suitable for use in the cancer patients? treatment.


  1. Das, I.J., Cheng, C.W., Watts, R.J., Ahnesj?, A., Gibbons, J., Li, X.A., Lowenstein, J., Mitra, R.K., Simon, W.E. and Zhu, T.C. (2008) Accelerator Beam Data Commissioning Equipment and Procedures: Report of the TG-106 of the Therapy Physics Committee of the AAPM. Medical Physics, 35, 4186-4215.
  2. Nath, R., Biggs, P.J., Bova, F.J., Ling, C.C., Purdy, J.A., van de Geijn, J. and Weinhous, M.S. (1994) AAPM Code of Practice for Radiotherapy Accelerators: Report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Task Group No. 45. Medical Physics, 21, 1093-1121. (AAPM Report No. 47)
  3. Khan, F.M. (2003) Physics of Radiation Therapy. 3rd Edition, Chapter No. 11, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  4. Khan, F.M. (2003) Physics of Radiation Therapy. 3rd Edition, Chapter No. 10, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  5. MedicalElectricalEquipmentPart2-1:Particularrequirementsforthesafetyofelectronacceleratorsintherange1 MeV to 50 MeV. IEC-60601-2-1. Geneva, Switzerland: International Electrotechnical Commission,1998.
  6. DosimetricLeaf Gap Measurement, Procedure Recommended by Varian Medical System. Eclipse 10 Inverse Planning Administration and Physics rev. 6.1.1.
  7. Gloria, P. (2013) Commissioning Measurements for Photon Beam Data on Three TrueBeam Linear Accelerators, and Comparison with Trilogy and Clinac 2100 Linear Accelerators. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 14, 4077
  8. ?E.B Podgorsak?, Radiation Oncology Physics.? A handbook for Teacher and Students?, Chapter No. 06. IAEA 2005.
  9. Khan, F.M. (2003) Physics of Radiation Therapy, Wolters and Kluwer business, USA, 2010.
  10. Khan, F.M. (2003) Physics of Radiation Therapy, 5th Edition, Chapter 13, Wolters and Kluwer business.

[M Mohib-ul Haq, Aijaz A Khan, Mohsin R Khan, Misba H Baba and Sajad A Rather. (2019); COMMISSIONING OF FIRST STATE OF ART CLINAC DHX MEDICAL LINEAR ACCELERATOR AT SHER- I- KASHMIR INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, J&K: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DOSIMETRIC ANALYSIS. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 7 (Mar). 467-474] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


Mohsin Rehman Khan
Senior Research Officer, Deptt. of Radiological Physics & Bio-Engineering, SKIMS, Srinagar-190011.

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/8658      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/8658