03Apr 2019

TO SCREEN FOR REFRACTIVE ERRORS AND AMBLYOPIA IN CHILDRENWITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY UNDER 5 YRS OF AGE WITH PHOTOSCREENER AND COMPARE WITH CYCLOPLEGIC REFRACTION.

Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

A comparison of refraction under cycloplegia with manual streak retinoscopywith autorefractor and photoscreener in children with intellectual disability under 5 years of age was undertaken at a tertiary care hospital. A total of 200 children with intellectual disability were recruited and examined . The study concluded that the photoscreener has various advantages including time saving, easy manipulation, portability and good compliance of targeted children especially those with intellectual disability as compared to retinoscopy examination.

  1. Safir, A., Hyams, L., Philpot, J. and Jagerman, L. S. (1970) Studies in refraction. The precision of retinoscopy. Arch Ophthalmology 84, 49?61.
  2. Zadnik, K., Mutti, D. O. and Adams, A. J. (1992) The repeatability of measurements of the ocular component. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 33, 2325?2333.
  3. Salcido AA, Bradley J, Donahue SP. Predictive value of photoscreening and traditional screening of preschool children. J AAPOS. 2005;9:114?120
  4. Singman E, Matta N, Tian J, Brubaker A, Silbert D. A comparison of the PlusoptiX S04 and A09 photoscreeners. Strabismus. 2013; 21: 85?87.
  5. Ayse YK, Onder U, Suheyla K. Accuracy of Plusoptix S04 in children and teens. Can J Ophthalmol. 2011; 46: 153?157.
  6. Paff T, Oudesluys-Murphy AM, Wolterbeek R, Swart-van den Berg M, de Nie JM, Tijssen E, et al. Screening for refractive errors in children: the plusoptiX S08 and the Retinomax K-plus2 performed by a lay screener compared to cycloplegicretinoscopy. J AAPOS. 2010; 14: 478?483.
  7. Saber Moghadam A, Alizadeh R, Zarei-Ghanavati M. Plusoptix S08 sensitivity in detecting strabismus as amblyogenic risk factor. Strabismus. 2103; 21: 230?234.
  8. Mirzajani A, Heirani M, Jafarzadehpur E, Haghani H. A comparison of the Plusoptix S08 photorefractor to retinoscopy and cycloretinoscopy. ClinExpOptom. 2013; 96: 394?399.
  9. Wesemann W, Dick B. Accuracy and accommodation capability of a handheld autorefractor. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000; 26: 62?70.
  10. Cordonnier M, Dramaix M. Screening for refractive errors in children: accuracy of the hand held refractor Retinomax to screen for astigmatism. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999; 83: 157?161.
  11. Abrahamsson M, Ohlsson J, Bj?rndahl M, Abrahamsson H. Clinical evaluation of an eccentric infrared photorefractor:ThePowerRefractor. ActaOphthalmolScand 2003; 81: 605?610.
  12. Erdurmus M, Yagci R, Karadag R, Durmus M. A comparison of photorefraction and retinoscopy in children. J AAPOS 2007; 11: 606?611.
  13. Yan X-R, Jiao W-Z, Li Z-W, Xu W-W, Li F-J, Wang L-H. Performance of the Plusoptix A09 Photoscreener in Detecting Amblyopia Risk Factors in Chinese Children Attending an Eye Clinic. Lu Z-L, ed. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(6)
  14. Arthur BW, Riyaz R, Rodriguez S, Wong J. Field testing of the plusoptiX S04 photoscreener. J AAPOS 2009;13:51-7.
  15. Ayse YK, Onder U, Suheyla K. Accuracy of Plusoptix S04 in children and teens. Can J Ophthalmol. 2011; 46: 153?157.
  16. Rosenfield M, Chiu NN. Repeatability of subjective and objective refraction. Optom Vis Sci 1995; 72: 577?579.
  17. Paff T, Oudesluys-Murphy AM, Wolterbeek R, Swart-van den Berg M, de Nie JM, Tijssen E, Schalij-Delfos NE. Screening for refractive errors in children: The Plusoptix S08 and the Retinomax K-plus2 performed by a lay screener compared to cycloplegicretinoscopy. J AAPOS 2010; 14: 478?483.
  18. Schimitzek T, Wesemann W. Clinical evaluation of refraction using handheld wavefrontautorefractor in young and adult patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; 28: 1655?1666.
  19. Gabriel GM, Mutti DO. Evaluation of infant accommodation using retinoscopy and photoretinoscopy. Optom Vis Sci 2009; 86: 208?215.
  20. Choi M, Weiss S, Schaeffel F, et al. Laboratory, clinical and kindergarten test of a new eccentric infrared photorefractor (PowerRefractor). Optom Vis Sci 2000; 77: 537?548.
  21. Dahlmann-Noor AH, et al. Vision screening in children by Plusoptix Vision Screener compared with gold-standard orthoptic assessment. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93: 342?345.
  22. Dahlmann-Noor AH, Comyn O, Kostakis V, Misra A, Gupta N, Heath J, Brown J et al. Plusoptix Vision Screener: the accuracy and repeatability of refractive measurements using a new autorefractor. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93: 346?349.
  23. Peterseim MM, Papa CE, Wilson ME, Cheeseman EW, Wolf BJ, Davidson JD, Trivedi RH. Photoscreeners in the pediatric eye office: compared testability and refractions on high-risk children. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158:932-8.
  24. Bogdănici CM, Săndulache CM, Vasiliu R, Obadă O. Difference of refraction values between standard autorefractometry and Plusoptix.Rom J Ophthalmol. 2016;60:249-254.

[Col Anirudh Singh and Gp Capt MA Khan. (2019); TO SCREEN FOR REFRACTIVE ERRORS AND AMBLYOPIA IN CHILDRENWITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY UNDER 5 YRS OF AGE WITH PHOTOSCREENER AND COMPARE WITH CYCLOPLEGIC REFRACTION. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 7 (Apr). 477-482] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Anirudh Singh
Nil

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/8842      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/8842

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 16 | No. of Views: 75