07Apr 2019

THE EFFECT OF LOCUS OF CONTROL AND PROFESSIONALISM ON WHISTLEBLOWING INTENTION BY USING ORGANIZATION COMMITMENT AS THE MODERATING VARIABLE.

  • Magister of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia.
  • Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

This study aims to provide a review of the effect of locus of control and professionalism on whistleblowing intention and organization commitment as a moderating variable. The research object in this study was in the State Financial Controller (BPKP) West of Sulawesi. Total population was 97 auditors and the technique of determining the sample uses simple random sampling and the sample is choosen randomly regardless of the level in the member of the population with a total sample of 78 respondents. The data were analyzed using moderated regression analysis (MRA) by means of SPSS version 22 software. The results of the research indicate that (1) locus of control has a positive and significant effect on whistleblowing intention; (2) professionalism has a positive and significant effect on whistleblowing intention; (3) organizational commitment moderates and strengthens the relationship of locus of control on whistleblowing intention; and (4) organizational commitment moderates and strengthens the relationship professionalism on whistleblowing intention.

  1. Ajzen, Icek. 2005. Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior. 2nd Berkshire. UK: Open University Press McGraw Hill Education.
  2. Ajzen, Icek. 1991. The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, (Online), Vol. 50, 179-211, (https://www.sciencedirect.com, diakses 2 Januari 2019)
  3. Ajzen, Icek. 2006. Constructing a Tpb Questionnaire: Conceptual and Methodologial Considerations. Occasional Paper. (Online) (http://people.umass.edu/aizen/diaksespada 17 Januari 2019).
  4. Allen, N.J. and J.P. Mayer. 1991. The Measurement and Antecedent of Affective, Continuance and Normative Commitment to the Organizational. Jornall of Occupational Psychology.63 (1):1-18.
  5. Alkautsar, Muslim. 2014. Locus of Control, Commitment Professional and Dysfunctional Audit Behavior. International Journal of Humanities and Management Sciences IIJHMS) Volume 2.
  6. A. Alvin, Elder, J. Randal, Beasley, S. Mark. 2009. Auditing Assurance Services. Twelve Edition. New Jersey : Pearson.
  7. Arfan, Ikhsan. 2010. AkuntansiKeprilakuan. Jakarta: SalembaEmpat.
  8. Ayu, H. Ester. 2014. PengaruhKomitmenProfesionaldan Locus of Control Auditor Internal terhadapIntensiMelakukanWhistleblowing :KesadaranEtisSebagaiVariabelPemoderasi. Tesis. Yogyakarta: UniversitasGadjahMada.
  9. Bagustianto, R danNurkholis. Faktor-faktor yang MempengaruhiMinatPegawaiNegeriSipil (PNS) untukMelakukanTindakan Whistleblowing (Studipada PNS BPK RI). JurnalIlmiahMahasiswa. Vol 3. No.1 h.1-19.
  10. Bariyama, David Kiabel. 2012. Auditor Internaling and Performance of Government Enterprises: A Nigerian Study. Double Blind Peer Reviewed International Research Journal, 12 (6): 1-17.
  11. Byrne. 1994. Social Psychology : Understanding Human Interaction. USA : Needham Heights Allyn and Bacon Inc.
  12. Bouville, Mathiew. 2016. Whistle-blowing and Morality. The Journal of Business Ethics (Online), Vol. 20:43; p.1 (http://www.springerlink.comdiaksestanggal 18 Januari 2019)
  13. Brennan, Niamh., Kelly, John. 2007. A Study of Whistleblowing among Trainee Auditors. British Accounting Review, (Online), Vol. 39 (1), 61-87), (https://papers.ssrn.com diaksestanggal 9 Januari 2019).
  14. Catherine F, Ratu. 2017. PengaruhSikap, Norma Subyektif, Perceived Behavioral Control, Reward, dan Locus of Control terhadapIntensiPerilakuWhisleblower. Tesis. Lampung: Program Pascasarjana Magister IlmuAdministrasiFakultasIlmuSosialPolitikUniversitas Lampung
  15. Chiu, K. Randy. 2003. ?Ethical Judgement, Locus of Control, and Whistleblowing Intention: A Case Study of Mainland Chinese MBA Students?. Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 17 Issue:9 pp. 581-587.
  16. Daivitri, AaiNiyaratih. 2013. PengaruhPertimbanganEtisdanKomponenPerilakuTerencanaPadaNiat Whistleblowing Internal dengan Locus of Control SebagaiVariabelPemoderasi. Tesis. Yogyakarta: UniversitasGadjahMada
  17. Dayaksini, Tri.,danHudaniah. 2013. PsikologiSosial. Malang: UMM
  18. Eisenberg-Berg, N., & Hand, M. 1979. The relationship of presschoolers? reasoning about prosocial moral con icts to prosocial behavior. Child Development, (Online), Vol. 50, No. 2 (Jun., 1979), pp. 356-363, (http://www.jstor.org, diakses 2 Januari 2019).
  19. Elias, 2008. Auditing Student Profesional Commitment and Anticipatory Socialization and Their Relationship to Whistleblowing. JournalManagerial Accounting. Vol. 23, No. 3, 283-294.
  20. Garman, Andrew N. 2006. Professionalism. Journal Of Healthcare Management. 51(4)
  21. Ghozali, Imam. 2011. AplikasiAnalisis Multivariate Dengan Program SPSS. Semarang: BadanPenerbitUniversitasDiponegoro.
  22. Gibson, James L., John M. Ivancevich, James H. Donnelly Jr., and Robert Konopaske. 2012. Organization: Behavior, Structure, Processes (14 Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
  23. Gitosudarmo, Indriyo.,danSudita, I Nyoman. 2008. PerilakuKeorganisasian. Yogyakarta: BPFE-Yogyakarta.
  24. Hall, H. Richard. 1968. Professionalization and Bureaucratization. American Sociological Review 33 (February) : 92-104.
  25. Hoffman, W. Michael and Robert E. 2008. ?A Business Ethics Theory of Whistleblowing?. Journal of Business and Environmental Ethics. Bentley University, Waltham MA. USA, (Online) 45-59 (https://www.bentley.edu/, diakses 10 Januari 2019)
  26. Hyatt, T., and D. Prawitt. 2001. Does Congruence Between Audit Structure and Auditors Locus of Control Affect Job Performance?. The Accounting Review 76.
  27. Indonesian Corruption Watch. 2019. (https://antikorupsi.orgdiaksestanggal 12 Januari 2019)
  28. Jalil, F. Y. 2012. PengaruhKomitmenProfesional Auditor terhadapIntensiMelakukan Whistleblowing. Locus of Control sebagaiVariabelPemoderasi. Tesis: Yogyakarta: UniversitasGadjahMada
  29. Janitra, WimpiAbirama. 2017. PengaruhOrientasiEtika, KomitmenProfesional, KomitmenOrganisasi, danSensitivitasEtisterhadap Internal Whistleblowing. JOM FakultasEkonomi, (Online), Vol. 4 No. 1, (https://jom.unri.ac.id, diakses 4 Januari 2019).
  30. 1984. Whistleblowing System. (AsepTriwahyudi, dkk. 2011) diunduhtahun 2011. http://www.wise.depkeu.go.id
  31. 2007. MetodologiPenelitianBisnis : Salah KaprahdanPengalaman-pengalaman. CetakanPertama. Yogyakarta : BPFE.
  32. Kalbers, L and P.T. Forgaty. 1995. Profesionalism and Its Consequences : A Study of Internal Auditors.? Journal of Auditing 14, no.1 (Sarasota: Spring 1995)
  33. Karmita, Fitriah. 2018. AnalisisKinerja Auditor MelaluiKomitmenProfesionaldan Whistleblower. Tesis. Makassar: Program Magister AkuntansiFakultasEkonomidanBisnisUniversitasHasanuddin.
  34. Komite SPAP IkatanAkuntan Indonesia (IAI). 2001. StandarProfesionalAkuntanPublik. Jakarta :SalembaEmpat.
  35. Kreitner, R, dan A Kinicki. 2000. PerilakuOrganisasi, Jakarta: Salemba.
  36. Larkin, Joseph M. 1990. Does Gender Affect Auditor CPAs? Performance?, The Women CPA, Spring, pp. 20-24.
  37. Lekatompessy, J.E. 2003. Hubunganprofesionalismedengankonsekuensinya: komitmenorganisasional, kepuasankerja, prestasikerja, keinginanberpindah (StudiEmpiris di lingkunganAkuntanPublik). JurnalBisnisdanAkuntansi. Vol.5 No.1 Hlm. 69-84.
  38. Luthans, Fred. 2006. OrganizationalBehavior. 9th Edition. New York: McGrawHill.
  39. 2002. AkuntansiSektorPublik. Penerbit: Andi. Yogyakarta
  40. Mayer, et al. 1993. Commitment to Organization and Occupations : Extension and Test of a Three-Component Conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology Vol. 78 No.4. American Psychological Association.
  41. Menesez, Alvaro A. 2008. AnalisisDampak Locus of Control terhadapKinerjadanKepuasanKerja Auditor Internal (Penelitianpada Internal Auditor di Jawa Tengah). UniversitasDiponegoro, (Online), Vol. 2 No.1, (http://eprints.undip.ac.id. diaksespada 12 Januari 2019)
  42. Miceli, M.P., and Near J., (1991). Blowing the Whistle: The Organizational and Legal Implications for Companies and Employess. New Jersey: Lexington Books.
  43. Mowday, et al. 1983. The Measurement of Organizational Commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology Vol. 84. American Psychology Association.
  44. Near, J. P. dan M. P. Miceli. 1995. Effective Whistle-blowing. Academy of Management, The Academy of Management Review 20(3), 679-708.
  45. Nugroho, Vredyoctaviari. 2015. PengaruhPersepsiKaryawanMengenai Whistleblowing System terhadapPencegahan Fraud denganPerilakuEtisSebagaiVariabel Intervening Pada PT. Pagilaran. Skripsi. Yogyakarta: FakultasEkonomidanBisnisUniversitasNegeri Yogyakarta.
  46. PeraturanMenteriPendayagunaanAparatur Negara danReformasiBirokrasiRepublik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2015 Tentang Road Map ReformasiBirokrasi 2015-2019.
  47. PeraturanPemerintahRepublik Indonesia Nomor 79 Tahun 2005 TentangPembinaandanPengawasanPenyelenggaraanPemerintah Daerah.
  48. PeraturanPresidenRepublik Indonesia Nomor 192 Tahun 2014 TentangBadanPengawasanKeuangandan Pembangunan (BPKP).
  49. Peter, Yeoh. 2014. Whistleblowing: motivations, corporate self-regulation, and the law. International. Journal of Law and Management, (Online) Vol. 56 Iss 6 pp. 459-474 (emeraldinsight.comdiaksespada 15 Januari 2019).
  50. Read, J. William. 2015. Whistle-blowing to Internal auditors. Managerial Accounting Journal. Vol. 18 Iss 5 pp. 354-362.
  51. Robbins, Stephen P. 2002. Prinsip-prinsipPerilakuOrganisasi. Edisikelima. Jakarta: PenerbitErlangga.
  52. Robbins, Stephen P dan Timothy, A. Judge. 2008. PerilakuOrganisasi. Buku II, Jakarta: SalembaEmpat.
  53. Robbins, Stephen P dan Timothy A. Judge. 2011. PerilakuOrganisasi. Jakarta: SalembaEmpat.
  54. Rotter, J.B. (1990). Internal vs External control reinforcement: A case history of a Variable. American Psychologist, (Online), 45(4), 489-493 (psycnet.apa.org, diakses 2 Januari 2019).
  55. Nadler, Judy and Schulman. Miriam. 2008. ?Whistle-Blowing in the Publik Sector?, SCU.EDU. The NCAA and Whistleblowers: 30-40 Years of Wrongdoing and College Sport and Possible Solutions. (online) Vol. XXVIII/Southern Law Journal https://www.scu.edu/ethicts/focus-areas/government-ethics/resources/what-is-government-ethicts/whistle-blowing-in-the-public-sector/ diaksestanggal 14 Januari 2019)
  56. 2017. PengaruhProfesional Auditor, OrientasiEtikaIdealisme, danRelativismeterhadap Whistleblowing denganSensivitasEtissebagaiVariabel Moderating. Makassar: FakultasEkonomidanBisnis Islam Alauddin Makassar.
  57. Rotter, J.B. 1966. Generalized Expectancies for Internal versus External Control of Reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, Vol.80, pp. 1-28
  58. Rotter, J.B. (1975). Some problems and misconceptions related to the construct of internal and external control in reinforcement. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, (Online), Vol. 43, 56-67, (psycnet.apa.org, diaksespada 11 Januari 2019)
  59. Sari, Devi Novita., Laksito, Herry. 2014. Profesionalisme Internal Auditor danIntensiMelakukan Whistleblowing. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, (Online) Vol 03. No. 03. (http://ejournal-undip.ac.id/index.php/accountingdiaksestanggal 8 Januari 2019)
  60. Sarita, Jena.,danAgustia, Dian. 2009. ?Pengaruh Gaya KepemimpinanSituasional, MotivasiKerja, Locus of Control terhadapKepuasanKerjadanPrestasiKerja Auditor?. SimposiumNasionalAkuntansi XII.
  61. Sawyer, B. Lawrence. 2008. Intennal Auditing Edisi Lima Jakarta: SalembaEmpat.
  62. Sears, David O. 1991. PsikologiSosial, jilid II. Jakarta :Erlangga.
  63. Sekaran, Uma &Bougie, Roger. 2016. Research Method for Business. A skill building Approach. Seventh Edition. Wiley.
  64. Siegel, G. & Helene, R.M. 1989. Behavioral Accounting. Ohio:South-Western Publishing Co. Cincinnatti.
  65. Staub, E. 1978. Positive Social Behavior and Morality: social and personal influences. New York: Academy Press.
  66. 2013. StatistikaUntukPenelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  67. SuharyantodanIryanto, Tata. 1996. KamusBesarBahasa Indonesia. Surabaya: Indah
  68. Sujarweni, V. Wiratna. 2015. MetodologiPenelitianBisnisdanEkonomi.Yogyakarta: PustakaBaru Press.
  69. Sunyoto, Danang. 2011. AnalisisRegresiuntukUjiHipotesis. Yogyakarta: Caps
  70. SuratEdaranMenteriPendayaanAparatur Negara danReformasiBirokrasiNomor 8/M.PAN-RB/06/2012 TentangSistemPenangananPengaduan Whistleblower System) TindakPidanaKorupsi di LingkunganKementrian/LembagadanPemerintah Daerah
  71. org.2018 (http://transparancy.org/country/IDN#, diaksestanggal 11 Januari 2019)
  72. Tuanakotta, Theodorrus M. 2011. BerpikirKritisdalam Auditing. Jakarta: SalembaEmpat.
  73. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). 1997. Governance for sustainable human development : A UNDP policy document. New York:Oxford University Press.
  74. Wiener, Y. 1982. ?Commitmenr in Organizations: A Normative View? , Academy of Management Review. Vol. 7 No 3. Pp. 418-428.
  75. Yanti, Harti Budi., Hasnawati. 2017. Kompetensi Moral danIntensi Whistleblowing. Jurnal Media RisetAkuntansi, Auditing, danInformasi, (Online), Vol. 17 (2), 2017, 131?144. (ejurnal.upi.edu, diakses 4 Januari 2019)
  76. Zoraifi, Renata. 2005. Pengaruh Locus of Control, Tingkat Pendidikan, PengalamanKerja, danPertimbanganEtisterhadapPerilaku Auditor dalamSituasiKonflik Audit. JurnalAkuntansidanBisnis. (Online) Vol. 5, No.1 (http://eprints.umk.ac.iddiakses 9 Januari 2019).

[Riana Anggraeny Ridwan, Syarifuddin And Arifuddin. (2019); THE EFFECT OF LOCUS OF CONTROL AND PROFESSIONALISM ON WHISTLEBLOWING INTENTION BY USING ORGANIZATION COMMITMENT AS THE MODERATING VARIABLE. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 7 (Apr). 779-791] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Riana Anggraeny Ridwan
Hasanuddin University, Indonesia

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/8886      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/8886

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 95 | No. of Views: 244