Vol. 7 (04) pp. 1525-1530 DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/8978

PREVALENCE OF MAMMOGRAPHY IN BRAZIL: A NATIONAL ANALYSIS.

and
  • Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil.
6 Downloads 57 Views
Crossref

Download Full Paper (PDF)

Abstract

Objective: to identify the prevalence of realization of mammography in Brazil, the socio-demographic characteristics of women that realized this exam, the time past since the last exam according to region, age and per capita income. Methods: the reference population was every Brazilian woman whose age was 30 years old or more (n=100.840). Prevalence of mammography realization was considered the outcome. The exploratory variables were: age, federative units, mammography realization local, familiar income per capita. Results: the mammography realization prevalence was 45,9%. The highest prevalence of mammography was among women between 50-59 years old (58,3%), white (52,2%). 42,2% of the exams were paid by the public health sector, 46% by private health plan and 18,8% by own patients. Conclusion: the prevalence of mammography is still low. The women that more had been examned live in Southeast region, are between 50-59 years old, are white, and with best familiar income per capita.

Keywords

Article Analytics

References

  1. Akhigbe AO, Omuemu VO. Knowledge, attitudes and practice of breast cancer screening among female health workers in a Nigerian urban city. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:203-11.
  2. Amorim VMSL. As pr?ticas preventivas para o c?ncer de mama e do colo do ?tero por mulheres de 40 anos ou mais de idade no munic?pio de Campinas - SP. [disserta??o] Campinas (SP): Universidade Estadual de Campinas; 2005.
  3. Instituto Nacional do C?ncer. Estimativa 2010: incid?ncia de c?ncer no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: INCA, 2009b.
  4. Minist?rio da Sa?de. Controle do c?ncer de mama: Documento de consenso. Rio de Janeiro, 2004.
  5. Minist?rio da Sa?de. Inqu?rito domiciliar sobre comportamentos de risco e morbidade referida de doen?as e agravos n?o transmiss?veis: Brasil, 15 capitais e Distrito Federal, 2002-2003. Dispon?vel em: http://www.inca.gov.br/inquerito/docs/detec_mama_colo.pdf.
  6. Minist?rio da Sa?de, Secretaria de Vigil?ncia em Sa?de, Ag?ncia Nacional de Sa?de Suplementar. Vigitel Brasil 2008 Sa?de Suplementar: vigil?nacia de fatores de risco e prote??o para doen?as cr?nicas por inqu?rito telef?nico. Rio de Janeiro. 2009a.
  7. Minist?rio de Planejamento, Or?amento e Gest?o. Pesquisa nacional por amostra de domic?lios: acesso e utiliza??o dos servi?os, condi??es de sa?de e fatores de risco e prote??o ? sa?de 2008. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2010a.
  8. Brasil Minist?rio da Sa?de, Secretaria de Vigil?ncia em Sa?de, Secretaria de Gest?o Estrat?gica e Participativa. Vigitel Brasil 2009: vigil?ncia de fatores de risco e prote??o para doen?as cr?nicas por inqu?rito telef?nico. Bras?lia. 2010b.
  9. Carmichael AR. Obesity and prognosis of breast cancer. Obes Rev. 2006 Nov;7(4):333-40.
  10. Chatenoud L, Bertuccio P, Bosetti C, Levi F, Curado MP, Malvezzi M, Negri E, La Vecchia C. Trends in cancer mortality in Brazil, 1980-2004. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2010 Mar;19(2):79-86.
  11. Clavel-Chapelon F; E3N-EPIC Group. Differential effects of reproductive factors on the risk of pre- and postmenopausal breast cancer. Results from a large cohort of French women. Br J Cancer. 2002 Mar 4;86(5):723-7.
  12. Corr?a R, Freitas-Junior R, Peixoto J, Rodrigues D, Lemos M, Marins L, et al. Cobertura mamogr?fica no estado de Goi?s, Brasil. In: 40? Jornada Paulista de Radiologia 2010.
  13. Friedenreich CM. The role of physical activity in breast cancer etiology. Semin Oncol. 2010 Jun;37(3):297-302. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2010.05.008.
  14. Kohatsu EA, Barbieri AR, Hortale VA. Exames de mamografia em Mato Grosso do Sul: an?lise da cobertura como componente de equidade. 2009;43:563-77.
  15. K?sters, JP; G?tzsche, PC Regular self-examination or clinical examination for early detection of breast cancer (Cochrane Review) In: The Cochrane Library, Oxford: Update Software, 2007
  16. Lima-Costa MF, Matos DL. Prevalence and factors associated with mammograms in the 50-69-year age group: a study based on the Brazilian National Household Sample Survey (PNAD-2003). Cad Sa?de P?blica. 2007;23:1665-73.
  17. Marchi AA, Gurgel MSC, Fonsechi-Carvasan GA. Rastreamento mamogr?fico do c?ncer de mama em servi?os de sa?de p?blicos e privados. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2006;28:214-9.
  18. Nasir A, Shackelford RE, Anwar F, Yeatman TJ. Genetic risk of breast cancer. Minerva Endocrinol. 2009 Dec;34(4):295-309.
  19. Novaes HMD, Braga PE, Schout D. Fatores associados ? realiza??o de exames preventivos para c?ncer nas mulheres brasileiras, PNAD 2003. Cienc Sa?de Coletiva. 2006;11:1023-35.
  20. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55:74-108.
  21. Silva AM. Acesso aos servi?os de sa?de em munic?pios da Baixada Santista. In: Sa?de Id, editor. S?o Paulo: Temas em Sa?de Coletiva; 2008.
  22. Strand BH, Kunst A, Huisman M, Menvielle G, Glickman M, Bopp M, et al. The reversed social gradient: higher breast cancer mortality in the higher educated compared to lower educated. A comparison of 11 European populations during the 1990s. Eur J Cancer. 2007 May;43(7):1200-7.

How to Cite This Article

Giovanni Salton Pietroni and Alexandra Crispim Boing. (2019); PREVALENCE OF MAMMOGRAPHY IN BRAZIL: A NATIONAL ANALYSIS., Int. J. of Adv. Res., 7 (04), 1525-1530, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/8978

Corresponding Author

Alexandra Crispim Boing
Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.