25Apr 2019

PREVALENCE OF MAMMOGRAPHY IN BRAZIL: A NATIONAL ANALYSIS.

  • Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Objective: to identify the prevalence of realization of mammography in Brazil, the socio-demographic characteristics of women that realized this exam, the time past since the last exam according to region, age and per capita income. Methods: the reference population was every Brazilian woman whose age was 30 years old or more (n=100.840). Prevalence of mammography realization was considered the outcome. The exploratory variables were: age, federative units, mammography realization local, familiar income per capita. Results: the mammography realization prevalence was 45,9%. The highest prevalence of mammography was among women between 50-59 years old (58,3%), white (52,2%). 42,2% of the exams were paid by the public health sector, 46% by private health plan and 18,8% by own patients. Conclusion: the prevalence of mammography is still low. The women that more had been examned live in Southeast region, are between 50-59 years old, are white, and with best familiar income per capita.

  1. Akhigbe AO, Omuemu VO. Knowledge, attitudes and practice of breast cancer screening among female health workers in a Nigerian urban city. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:203-11.
  2. Amorim VMSL. As pr?ticas preventivas para o c?ncer de mama e do colo do ?tero por mulheres de 40 anos ou mais de idade no munic?pio de Campinas - SP. [disserta??o] Campinas (SP): Universidade Estadual de Campinas; 2005.
  3. Instituto Nacional do C?ncer. Estimativa 2010: incid?ncia de c?ncer no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: INCA, 2009b.
  4. Minist?rio da Sa?de. Controle do c?ncer de mama: Documento de consenso. Rio de Janeiro, 2004.
  5. Minist?rio da Sa?de. Inqu?rito domiciliar sobre comportamentos de risco e morbidade referida de doen?as e agravos n?o transmiss?veis: Brasil, 15 capitais e Distrito Federal, 2002-2003. Dispon?vel em: http://www.inca.gov.br/inquerito/docs/detec_mama_colo.pdf.
  6. Minist?rio da Sa?de, Secretaria de Vigil?ncia em Sa?de, Ag?ncia Nacional de Sa?de Suplementar. Vigitel Brasil 2008 Sa?de Suplementar: vigil?nacia de fatores de risco e prote??o para doen?as cr?nicas por inqu?rito telef?nico. Rio de Janeiro. 2009a.
  7. Minist?rio de Planejamento, Or?amento e Gest?o. Pesquisa nacional por amostra de domic?lios: acesso e utiliza??o dos servi?os, condi??es de sa?de e fatores de risco e prote??o ? sa?de 2008. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2010a.
  8. Brasil Minist?rio da Sa?de, Secretaria de Vigil?ncia em Sa?de, Secretaria de Gest?o Estrat?gica e Participativa. Vigitel Brasil 2009: vigil?ncia de fatores de risco e prote??o para doen?as cr?nicas por inqu?rito telef?nico. Bras?lia. 2010b.
  9. Carmichael AR. Obesity and prognosis of breast cancer. Obes Rev. 2006 Nov;7(4):333-40.
  10. Chatenoud L, Bertuccio P, Bosetti C, Levi F, Curado MP, Malvezzi M, Negri E, La Vecchia C. Trends in cancer mortality in Brazil, 1980-2004. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2010 Mar;19(2):79-86.
  11. Clavel-Chapelon F; E3N-EPIC Group. Differential effects of reproductive factors on the risk of pre- and postmenopausal breast cancer. Results from a large cohort of French women. Br J Cancer. 2002 Mar 4;86(5):723-7.
  12. Corr?a R, Freitas-Junior R, Peixoto J, Rodrigues D, Lemos M, Marins L, et al. Cobertura mamogr?fica no estado de Goi?s, Brasil. In: 40? Jornada Paulista de Radiologia 2010.
  13. Friedenreich CM. The role of physical activity in breast cancer etiology. Semin Oncol. 2010 Jun;37(3):297-302. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2010.05.008.
  14. Kohatsu EA, Barbieri AR, Hortale VA. Exames de mamografia em Mato Grosso do Sul: an?lise da cobertura como componente de equidade. 2009;43:563-77.
  15. K?sters, JP; G?tzsche, PC Regular self-examination or clinical examination for early detection of breast cancer (Cochrane Review) In: The Cochrane Library, Oxford: Update Software, 2007
  16. Lima-Costa MF, Matos DL. Prevalence and factors associated with mammograms in the 50-69-year age group: a study based on the Brazilian National Household Sample Survey (PNAD-2003). Cad Sa?de P?blica. 2007;23:1665-73.
  17. Marchi AA, Gurgel MSC, Fonsechi-Carvasan GA. Rastreamento mamogr?fico do c?ncer de mama em servi?os de sa?de p?blicos e privados. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2006;28:214-9.
  18. Nasir A, Shackelford RE, Anwar F, Yeatman TJ. Genetic risk of breast cancer. Minerva Endocrinol. 2009 Dec;34(4):295-309.
  19. Novaes HMD, Braga PE, Schout D. Fatores associados ? realiza??o de exames preventivos para c?ncer nas mulheres brasileiras, PNAD 2003. Cienc Sa?de Coletiva. 2006;11:1023-35.
  20. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55:74-108.
  21. Silva AM. Acesso aos servi?os de sa?de em munic?pios da Baixada Santista. In: Sa?de Id, editor. S?o Paulo: Temas em Sa?de Coletiva; 2008.
  22. Strand BH, Kunst A, Huisman M, Menvielle G, Glickman M, Bopp M, et al. The reversed social gradient: higher breast cancer mortality in the higher educated compared to lower educated. A comparison of 11 European populations during the 1990s. Eur J Cancer. 2007 May;43(7):1200-7.

[Giovanni Salton Pietroni and Alexandra Crispim Boing. (2019); PREVALENCE OF MAMMOGRAPHY IN BRAZIL: A NATIONAL ANALYSIS. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 7 (Apr). 1525-1530] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Alexandra Crispim Boing
Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/8978      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/8978

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 6 | No. of Views: 41