27May 2019

A CASE SERIES ON RESTORATION OF LARGE CARIOUS DEFECT IN POSTERIOR TEETH USING INDIRECT COMPOSITE RESIN.

  • Professor and H.O.D, Department of Conservative Dentistry &Endodontics, Guru Nanak Institute of Dental Sciences & Research, Panihati, Kolkata-114, West Bengal, India.
  • Post Graduate Trainee, Department of Conservative Dentistry &Endodontics, Guru Nanak Institute of Dental Sciences & Research, Panihati, Kolkata-114, West Bengal, India.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Modern restorative dentistry offers many methods of restoring the carious teeth. The advancements in adhesive dentistry have brought significant changes in the treatment of caries. Dental composite formulations have been continuously evolving ever since BISGMA was introduced to dentistry by Bowen in 1962. The composite materials can be divided into direct and indirect resin composites (IRC). In some situations, indirect composite techniques are more advantageous than direct composite filling techniques, such as establishing proper occlusal and inter-proximal anatomy, reducing polymerization shrinkage stress, and promoting the degree of conversion. Indirect composite restorations are usually recommended in posterior teeth requiring large restorations. The given functional and esthetic outcomes demonstrate the promising applicability of the indirect composite technique.

  1. Veneziani, M. Posterior indirect adhesive restorations: Updated indications and the morphology driven preparation technique. Int. J. Esthet. Dent. 2017, 12, 204?230.
  2. Angeletaki, F.; Gkogkos, A.; Papazoglou, E.; Kloukos, D. Direct versus indirect inlay/onlay composite restorations in posterior teeth. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Dent. 2016, 53, 12?21.
  3. D?Arcangelo, C.; Vanini, L.; Casinelli, M.; Frascaria, M.; De Angelis, F.; Vadini, M.; D?Amario, M. Adhesive cementation of indirect composite inlays and onlays: A literature review. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent. 2015,36, 570?577.
  4. D?Arcangelo, C.; Zarow, M.; De Angelis, F.; Vadini, M.; Paolantonio, M.; Giannoni, M.; D?Amario, M. Five-year retrospective clinical study of indirect composite restorations luted with a light-cured composite in posterior teeth. Clin. Oral Investig. 2014, 18, 615?624.
  5. da Veiga, A.M.; Cunha, A.C.; Ferreira, D.M.; da Silva Fidalgo, T.K.; Chianca, T.K.; Reis, K.R.; Maia, L.C. Longevity of direct and indirect resin composite restorations in permanent posterior teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Dent. 2016, 54, 1?12.
  6. Huth KC, Chen HY, Mehl A, et al. Clinical study of indirect composite resin inlays in posterior stress-bearing cavities placed by dental students: Results after 4 years. J Dent. 2011;39(7):478−488.
  7. Jongsma LA, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Clinical success and survival of indirect resin composite crowns: Results of a 3-year prospective study. Dental Materials. 2012;28(9):952?960.
  8. Ozakar-Ilday N, Zorba YO, Yildiz M, et al. Three-year clinical performance of two indirect composite inlays compared to direct composite restorations. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013;18(3):e521−e528.
  9. Alharbi A, Rocca GT, Dietschi D, et al. Semidirect composite onlay with cavity sealing: a review of clinical procedures. J EsthetRestor Dent. 2014;26(2):97−106.
  10. Nicola B, Alessandro P, Michele V, et al. Indirect composite restorations luted with two different procedures: A ten years follow up clinical trial. J ClinExp Dent. 2015;7(1):54−59
  11. GiuseppeI, Andrea(2008) ?Indirect Composite restorations in the Posterior Region-International Journal of Clinical Dentistry, January Volume 1, Issue 1
  12. Petropoulou A, Pantzari F, Nomikos N, Chronopoulos V and Kourtis S (2013) The Use of Indirect Resin Composites in Clinical Practice: A Case Series - Petropoulou et al., Dentistry, 3:3
  13. Miara P (1998) Aesthetic guidelines for second-generation inlays and onlay composite restorations. PracPeriodontAesthet Dent 10: 423-431.
  14. M?rciaBorba, ?lvaro Della Bona, DiletaCecchetti (2009) Flexural strength and hardness of direct and indirect composites - Braz Oral Res;23(1):5-10
  15. Soares CJ, Santana FR, Fonseca RB, Martins LR, Neto FH (2007) In vitro analysis of the radio-density of indirect composites and ceramic inlay systems and its influence on the detection of cement overhangs. Clin Oral Investig 11:331-336.
  16. Nandini S (2010) Indirect resin composites. J Conserv Dent 13: 184-194.
  17. Hirata M, Koizumi H, Tanoue N, Ogino T, Murakami M et al. (2011) Influence of laboratory light sources on the wear characteristics of indirect composites. Dent Mater J 30: 127-135.
  18. RenataChałas, Marta Jurczykowska, Rafał Marc zyński, ElżbietaPels (2014) Composite inlays as a modern way of posterior restorations in the dental arch - Pol J Public Health;124(2): 99-102.

[Paromita Mazumdar, Tushar Kanti Majumdar, Debarpan Mandal and Pritam Sengupta. (2019); A CASE SERIES ON RESTORATION OF LARGE CARIOUS DEFECT IN POSTERIOR TEETH USING INDIRECT COMPOSITE RESIN. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 7 (May). 1352-1358] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Dr. Tushar Kanti Majumdar
Guru Nanak Institute Of Dental Sciences And Research, 157/F Nilgunj Road, Panihati, West Bengal - 700114

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/9174      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/9174

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 124 | No. of Views: 294