EVALUATION OF ROOT CANAL MORPHOLOGY OF MAXILLARY PERMANENT SECOND MOLARS USING CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN CHENNAI - A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY.
- Reader,Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute Of Medical And Technical Science, Saveetha University.
- Graduate Student,Department of Pedodontics,Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute Of Medical And Technical Science, Saveetha University.
27 Downloads
103 Views
Abstract
Aim:To study the variation in the root canal morphology of maxillary permanent second molars in the Chennai population based on Vertucci classification by using cone beam computed tomography.
Background:The success of endodontic treatment is mainly attributed to the understanding of the root canal morphology, proper cleaning and shaping, followed by obturation of the prepared root canals. Certain distinct features of the teeth may complicate an endodontic treatment due to the complex morphology and various individual variations of the teeth. Hence, It is important for a dentist to evaluate the root canal morphology of the teeth, which can be done using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) prior to any treatment involving the tooth pulp in order to ensure the success and effectiveness of the dental treatment.
Materials and Methods:One hundred Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) images are randomly selected from the Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology in Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, India. The selected CBCT images are examined for the inclusion criteria in maxillary permanent second molars based on Vertucci classification.
Results:A total of 170 permanent maxillary second molars were examined in this study. Type 1 is commonly seen in males (90.59%), followed by Type 3 (4.31%), Type 5 (2.75%), Type 2 (1.96%) and Type 8 (0.39%) based on the Vertucci?s classification. In females, most of the root canal morphology is of Type 1 (87.84%), followed by Type 5 (3.53%), Type 3 (2.35%) and Type 4 (0.78%) respectively.
The mean values of the length of mesiobuccal root of permanent maxillary second molars are 11.6997 mm in males and 11.0313 mm in females with standard deviations of 0.9541 and 0.9371 in males and females respectively. As for the length of distobuccal root, the mean values are 11.5302 mm with standard deviation of 0.8823 in males and 10.7267 mm in females with standard deviation of 0.5867. The mean values of the palatal root are 12.0041 mm in males and 11.0693 in females with standard deviations of 0.9714 and 0.6965 in males and
females respectively.
The mean distance between the occlusal pit and pulp chamber are 4.3681 mm with standard deviation of 0.5769 in males and 4.3728 mm with standard deviation of 0.7828 in females. The distance between the pulpal floor and furcation are reported to have a mean value of 3.3034 mm in males and 2.5493 mm in females with standard deviations of 0.6509 and 0.3765 in males and females respectively. The mean distance between the cement-enamel junction (CEJ) and pulp chamber is 3.2283 mm in males with standard deviation of 0.5708 and 2.6727 mm in females with standard deviation of 0.3853.
Conclusion: Based on the findings in this study, it can be concluded that there is no significant variation in the root canal morphology of permanent maxillary second molars between males and females, particularly in the Chennai population as most of them commonly exhibit Type 1 in the permanent maxillary second molars. CBCT is one of the best methods to help dentists in proper evaluation of the root canal configurations in order to ensure the success of an endodontic treatment.
Keywords
Article Analytics
References
- Reich E, Lussi A, Newbrun E, 1999. Caries‐risk assessment.?International dental journal,?49(1), pp.15-26.
- Yang R, Yang C, Liu Y, Hu Y, Zou J, 2013. Evaluate root and canal morphology of primary mandibular second molars in Chinese individuals by using cone-beam computed tomography.?Journal of the Formosan Medical Association,?112(7), pp.390-395.
- Aminabadi NA, Farahani RM, Gajan EB, 2008. Study of root canal accessibility in human primary molars.?Journal of oral science,?50(1), pp.69-74.
- Goerig, A.C. and Camp, J.H., 1983. Root canal treatment in primary teeth: a review.?Pediatric dentistry,?5(1), pp.33-37.
- Kim Y, Lee SJ, Woo J, 2012. Morphology of maxillary first and second molars analyzed by cone-beam computed tomography in a Korean population: variations in the number of roots and canals and the incidence of fusion.?Journal of endodontics,?38(8), pp.1063-1068.
- Razumova S, Brago A, Khaskhanova L, Barakat H, Howijieh A, 2018. Evaluation of anatomy and root canal morphology of the maxillary first molar using the cone-beam computed tomography among residents of the moscow region.?Contemporary clinical dentistry,?9(Suppl 1), p.S133.
- Tu M.G, Liu JF, Dai PW, Chen SY, Hsu JT, Huang HL, 2010. Prevalence of three-rooted primary mandibular first molars in Taiwan.?Journal of the Formosan Medical Association,?109(1), pp.69-74.
- Liu JF, Dai PW, Chen SY, Huang HL, Hsu JT, Chen WL, Tu MG, 2010. Prevalence of 3-rooted primary mandibular second molars among Chinese patients.?Pediatric dentistry,?32(2), pp.123-126.
- Piesco NP, 1994. Histology of dentin.?Oral development and histology, pp.98-110.
- Hibbaed ED, 1957. Morphology of the root canals of the primary molar teeth.? Dent. Child.,?24, pp.250-257.
- Davis SR, Brayton SM, Goldman M, 1972. The morphology of the prepared root canal: a study utilizing injectable silicone.?Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology,?34(4), pp.642-648.
- Sidow SJ, West LA, Liewehr FR, Loushine RJ, 2000. Root canal morphology of human maxillary and mandibular third molars.?Journal of endodontics,?26(11), pp.675-678.
- Mesbahi M, Talei Z, Mollaverdi F, Kadkhodazadeh M, 2010. Comparison of root canal system configuration in primary teeth.?Res J BiolSci,?5(7), pp.488-91.
- Salama FS, Anderson RW, McKnight-Hanes C, Barenie JT, Myers DR, 1992. Anatomy of primary incisor and molar root canals.?Pediatr Dent,?14(2), pp.117-8.
- Wang YL, Chang HH, Kuo CI, Chen SK, Guo MK, Huang GF, Lin CP, 2013. A study on the root canal morphology of primary molars by high-resolution computed tomography.?Journal of Dental Sciences,?8(3), pp.321-327.
- Dowker SE, Davis GR, Elliott JC, 1997. X-ray microtomography: nondestructive three-dimensional imaging for in vitro endodontic studies.?Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology,?83(4), pp.510-516.
- Rhodes JS, Ford TP, Lynch JA, Liepins PJ, Curtis RV, 1999. Micro‐computed tomography: a new tool for experimental endodontology.?International Endodontic Journal,?32(3), pp.165-170.
- Peters OA, Laib A, R?egsegger P, Barbakow F, 2000. Three-dimensional analysis of root canal geometry by high-resolution computed tomography.?Journal of Dental Research,?79(6), pp.1405-1409.
- Peters OA, Laib A, G?hring TN, Barbakow F, 2001. Changes in root canal geometry after preparation assessed by high-resolution computed tomography.?Journal of Endodontics,?27(1), pp.1-6.
- Chandra B S, Gopikrishna V, Grossman L I (2014).?Grossmans endodontic practice. Wolters Kluwer (India).
- Zheng QH, Wang Y, Zhou XD, Wang Q, Zheng GN, Huang DM, 2010. A cone-beam computed tomography study of maxillary first permanent molar root and canal morphology in a Chinese population.?Journal of endodontics,?36(9), pp.1480-1484.
- Yu X, Guo B, Li KZ, Zhang R, Tian YY, Wang H, Hu T, 2012. Cone-beam computed tomography study of root and canal morphology of mandibular premolars in a western Chinese population.?BMC medical imaging,?12(1), p.18.
- Ghoncheh Z, Zade BM, Kharazifard MJ, 2017. Root morphology of the maxillary first and second molars in an Iranian population using cone beam computed tomography.?Journal of dentistry (Tehran, Iran),?14(3), p.115.
- Tanvi M, Vimala N, Lalitagauri M, 2016. Evaluation of the root morphology of maxillary permanent first and second molars in an Indian subpopulation using cone beam computed tomography.?J Dent Med Sci,?15, pp.51-6.
- Alrahabi M, Zafar MS, 2015. Evaluation of root canal morphology of maxillary molars using cone beam computed tomography.?Pakistan journal of medical sciences,?31(2), p.426.
- Nikoloudaki GE, Kontogiannis TG, Kerezoudis NP, 2015. Suppl 2: M3: Evaluation of the Root and Canal Morphology of Maxillary Permanent Molars and the Incidence of the Second Mesiobuccal Root Canal in Greek Population Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography.?The open dentistry journal,?9, p.267.
- Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Ahuja R, Subbarao CV, Gutmann, JL, 2010. Cone-beam computed tomography study of root and canal morphology of maxillary first and second molars in an Indian population.?Journal of endodontics,?36(10), pp.1622-1627.
How to Cite This Article
Nur Liyana Hannah Binti Izham Akmal and Mahesh Ramakrishnan. (2019); EVALUATION OF ROOT CANAL MORPHOLOGY OF MAXILLARY PERMANENT SECOND MOLARS USING CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN CHENNAI - A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY., Int. J. of Adv. Res., 7 (09), 1284-1291, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/9784
Corresponding Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





