HARMONICA SCALPEL VERSUS MILLIGAN MORGAN TECHNIQUE WITH ELECTRO CAUTERY FOR HAEMORRHOIDECTOMY.
- M.B.Ch.B, M.Sc (Radiology)A radiologist at Al-Nuaman Teaching Hospital.
- M.B.Ch.B, DS A general surgeon at Al-Nuaman Teaching Hospital.
- Abstract
- Keywords
- References
- Cite This Article as
- Corresponding Author
Background: The hemorrhoids is a quite common disease that is usually treated by surgery (stage 3 and 4) depending on the grade of the disease at presentation with some role for conservative treatment when presented early (stage 1 and 2). The open conventional haemorrhoidectomy by Milligan Morgan supported by electro cautery was used, many new techniques established among these is Harmonica scalpel. Materials and method: 302 patients in stage 3 and 4 haemorrhoids involved in this study in the time period from January 2016 to December 2018. Harmonica scalpel used for the surgical treatment of 152 patients, and 150 patients treated by conventional haemorrhoidectomy. A comparison was made between these two methods regarding operation time, postoperative pain, post-operative bleeding, analgesics, hospitalization, time to return to normal activity and post-operative complications. Results: The average time for operation was 15?5 minutes with post-operative hospitalization 6 hours for Harmonica scalpel, for Milligan Morgan the average time for operation was 25?7 minutes with post-operative hospitalization 24 hours. Peri-operative bleeding was negligible for Harmonica scalpel and was significant for conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Post-operative bleeding was negligible in patients submitted to HS and was significant in patients underwent MM, analgesics were needed for 3 days after HS technique and 10 days for MM surgery. Conclusion: HS haemorrhoidectomy is preferred technique to be used in grade 3 and 4 haemorrhoids with shorter operation time, less intra-operative & post-operative bleeding, less post-operative pain & less post-operative complications as compared with the conventional Milligan Morgan's procedure.
- La Torre F, Nicolai AP, (2004). Clinical use of micronized purified flavonoid fraction for treatment of symptoms after hemorrhoidectomy: results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum, 47(5):704-10
- Tjandra JJ, Chan MK, (2007). Systematic review on the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled hemorrhoidopexy). Dis Colon Rectum, 50(6): 878-92
- Fergusen JA, Heaton J R, (1959). Closed haemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum, 2(2): 176-179.
- Khanna R, Khanna S, Bahadani S, Singh S, Khanna AK, (2010).
- Comparison of Ligasure haemorrhoidectomy with conventional Fergusens haemorrhoidectomy. Indian J surg, 72(4): 294-297.
- Sanchez C, Chinn BT, (2011). Hemorrhoids. Clin Colon Rectal Surg, 24(1): 5.
- Kuehn HG, Gebbensleben O, Hilger Y, Rohde H, (2009). Relationship between anal symptoms and anal findings. Int J Med Sci, 6(2): 77.
- Abo-Hashem AA, Sarhan A, Aly AM, (2010). Harmonic scalpel compared with bipolar electro-cautery hemorrhoidectomy, a randomized controlled trial. Int J Surg, 8(3): 2437.
- Voutilainen PE, Haglund CH, (2000). Ultrasonically activated shears in thyroidectomies, a randomized trial. Ann Surg, 231(3): 322-28.
- Chen JS, You JF, (2010). Current status of surgical treatment for haemorrhoids. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Chang Gung Med J, 33(5): 488-500.
- Armstrong DN1, Ambroze WL, Schertzer ME, Orangio GR, (2001). Harmonic Scalpel vs. electrocautery hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum, 44(4): 558-64.
- Thiyagarajan A, Bhatnagar S, (2017). Comparative study of management of grade III hemorrhoids by Harmonic Scalpel technique versus conventional surgical technique (Milligan Morgan method).IntSurg J, 4(9): 3007-14
- Lim DR, Cho DH, Lee JH, Moon JH, (2016). Comparison of a hemorrhoidectomy with ultrasonic scalpel versus a conventional hemorrhoidectomy. Ann Coloproctol, 32(3): 111-16
- Engel AF, Eijspouts QA, (2000). Haemorrhoidectomy: painful choice. Lancet, 355(9222): 2253-54.
- Muzi MJ, Milito G, Nigro C, Cadeddu F, Andriole F, Amabile D, et al., (2007). Randomized clinical trial of ligature and conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg, 94(8): 937-42.
- Kwork SY, Chung CC, Tsui KK, Li MK, (2005). A double-blind randomized trial comparing ligasure and harmonic scalpel haemorrhoidectomy. Dis colon Rectum, 48(2): 344-48.
[Bahaa Saleh Abdalnby, Mustafa Adham Ismael and Hussein Jasim Dadoosh Al-janabi. (2019); HARMONICA SCALPEL VERSUS MILLIGAN MORGAN TECHNIQUE WITH ELECTRO CAUTERY FOR HAEMORRHOIDECTOMY. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 7 (Sep). 259-262] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com
A general surgeon at Al-Nuaman Teaching Hospital