Vol. 7 (11) pp. 548-554 DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/10044

PSEUDOEXFOLIATIVE CATARACT AMONG NORTH AND SOUTH INDIAN PATIENTS - FIRST MULTICENTRIC TRIAL STUDY

22 Downloads 110 Views
Crossref

Abstract

Background:Pseudoexfoliation (PEX) syndrome is one of the identifiable cause cataract worldwide. The reported prevalences in different parts of the world have varied from 0% to 38% in different populations. Aim:Our study, we report the prevalence and complications of PEX syndrome in a rural population in southern and northern India. Methods:1000 patients each from 6 geographically contiguous districts around Coimbatore district of the state of Tamil Nadu in South India and 6 geographically contiguous districts around Kanpur district of the state of Uttar Pradesh in North India for 1 year. Ophthalmic evaluation included recording of relevant ocular and medical history, were recorded. Results:1000 patients examined in South & North India, 600 people & 300 people had farming as their major occupation respectively. In south India, 100 (10%) were found to have PEX syndrome, whereas in North India, it was 60 (6%). The sex distribution reported a female preponderance. The mean age of subjects with PEX syndrome is 11.16 years older than the normal population. Conclusion:Majority of study population in South India had farming as occupation with an average of 12-16 hours exposure to direct sunlight whereas in North India, majority were labourers with an average of 6-8 hours exposure to sunlight. More solar rays can reach the eye during the earlier decades of life as pupil size is known to be larger with younger age. This may be the most likely explain as to why pseudoexfoliation syndrome is more common among South Indians as compared to North Indians

Keywords

Article Analytics

References

  1. Ritch R, Schl?tzer-Schrehardt U. Exfoliation (pseudoexfoliation) syndrome: toward a new understanding.?Acta Ophthalmol Scand2001;79:213?17.
  2. Forsius H. Prevalence of pseudoexfoliation of the lens in Finns, Lapps, Icelanders, Eskimos and Russians.?Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK1979;99:296
  3. Cashwell LF, Shields MB. Exfoliation syndrome: prevalence in a southeastern United States population.?Arch Ophthalmol1988;106:335?36.
  4. Hiller R, Sperduto RD, Krueger DE. Pseudoexfoliation, intraocular pressure, and senile lens changes in a population based survey.?Arch Ophthalmol1982;100:1080?7.
  5. Faulkener HW. Pseudoexfoliation of the lens among Navajo Indians.?Am J Ophthalmol1971;72:206.
  6. Arnarsson A, Jonasson F, Damji KF, et al. Exfoliation syndrome in the Reykjavik Eye Study: risk factors for baseline prevalence and 5-year incidence.?Br J Ophthalmol.?2010;94(7):831?835.
  7. Chylack LT, Leske MC, McCarthy D,?et al.Lens Opacities Classification System II (LOCS II).?Arch Ophthalmol?1989;107:991?7.
  8. Forsius H. Prevalence of pseudoexfoliation of the lens in Finns, Lapps, Icelanders, Eskimos and Russians.?Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK1979;99:296.
  9. Cashwell LF, Shields MB. Exfoliation syndrome: prevalence in a southeastern United States population.?Arch Ophthalmol1988;106:335?36.
  10. Hiller R, Sperduto RD, Krueger DE. Pseudoexfoliation, intraocular pressure, and senile lens changes in a population based survey.?Arch Ophthalmol1982;100:1080?7.
  11. McCarthy CA, Taylor HR. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome in Australian adults.?Am J Ophthalmol2000;129:629?33.
  12. Mitchell P, Wang JJ, Hourihan F. The relationship between glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation: The Blue Mountains Eye Study.?Arch Ophthalmol117:1319?24.
  13. Sood NN, Ratnaraj A. Pseudoexfoliation of the lens capsule.?Orient Arch Ophthalmol1968;6:62.
  14. Lamba PA, Giridhar A. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome (prevalence based on random survey hospital data).?Indian J Ophthalmol1984;32:169?73.
  15. Kozart DM, Yanoff M. Intraocular pressure status in 100 consecutive patients with exfoliation syndrome.?Ophthalmology1982;89:214?18.
  16. Kang JH, Wiggs JL, Pasquale LR. Relation between time spent outdoors and exfoliation glaucoma or exfoliation glaucoma suspect.?Am J Ophthalmol.?2014;158:605?614.
  17. Sliney DH. Intraocular and crystalline lens protection from ultraviolet damage.?Eye Contact Lens.?2011;37:250?258.
  18. Pasquale LR, Jiwani AZ, Zehavi-Dorin T, et al. Solar exposure and residential geographic history in relation to exfoliation sydnrome in the United States and Israel.?JAMA Ophthalmol.?2014;132(12):1439?1445.
  19. Green AC, Wallingford SC, McBride P. Childhood exposure to ultraviolet radiation and harmful skin effects: Epidemiological evidence.?Prog Biophys Mol Biol.?2011;107:349?355.

How to Cite This Article

Atul Kamath M, Dhananjay A Bhosale and Neha A Panicker (2019); PSEUDOEXFOLIATIVE CATARACT AMONG NORTH AND SOUTH INDIAN PATIENTS - FIRST MULTICENTRIC TRIAL STUDY, Int. J. of Adv. Res., 7 (11), 548-554, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/10044

Corresponding Author

DR ATUL KAMATH M
OPHTHALMOLOGIST