18Feb 2020

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF KNOWLEDGE ABOUT CAPACITY AND CONSENT AMONGST DOCTORS WORKING IN PRIVATE AND GOVERNMENT SECTORS IN INDIA

  • MBBS, Post-graduate Trainee, Masters in Emergency Medicine Programme George Washington University, Washington, USA.
  • MBBS, MCEM [UK], MRCS [Edinburgh], MRCS [Glasgow] Clinical Director & H.O.D. Dept. of Emergency Medicine.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Although the Indian definition of the term consent traces its origin to the New York Civil Code,as per Section 13 of the Indian Contract Act,1872 two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense.[1].The language of consent, as some agree, is more judicial or expository than legislative. Section 11 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 States that every person is competent to contract who is of the age of majority according to the law to which is subject, and who is of sound mind and is not disqualified by any law to which he is subject.[1].However capacity to consent must be distinguished from authority to consent.This study aims at observing and assessing the knowledge of doctors, regarding the aspects of consent in certain situations, that they mostly come across, while practising in various clinical and non clinical departments in private and government institutions across India. It is an observational, questionnaire based study that has been conducted in Peerless Hospitex Hospital and Dr B.K. Roy Research Institute over a period of 24 months(November 2017- October 2019) after obtaining ethical clearance.It has been observed that there is no significant difference in knowledge regarding consent-taking practices amongst doctors across varied age groups [p value of 0.5(>0.05)]. However there is significant difference in knowledge regarding capacity to give consent across varied age groups of doctors [p value of 0.028(<0.05)]. It is also noted that years of work experience does not significantly affect knowledge regarding consent-taking [p value of 0.554(>0.05)] but, does affect knowledge regarding capacity to consent [p value of 0.010(<0.05)]. Interestingly it has also been found that doctors practising in government and private healthcare institutions have significant difference in knowledge regarding capacity to consent [p value<0.05] but have almost similar knowledge regarding consent itself [p value of 0.152(>0.05)]. Number of working hours(full/part time) does not have any significant effect on knowledge amongst doctors. It has also been observed that doctors working across various disciplines, irrespective of government or private institutions, have significant difference in knowledge regarding consent and capacity to consent, with the maximum knowledge possessed the discipline of Emergency Medicine(mean value of 4.52 and 3.08 respectively).

  1. The Indian Contract Act, 1872. Updated 14th Edition.
  2. Garner BA. Blacks Law Dictionary, Tenth Edition: Thomson Reuters: 2014
  3. Oliver K. Consent is not a Contract: A Los Angeles Review of Books: 2016
  4. Mallardi, V. The origin of informed consent. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct; 25[5]:312-27
  5. Bal, A. . [2016]. Informed consent ? legal and ethical aspects. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 7 [2], 56. Retrieved from https://ijme.in/articles/informed-consent-legal-and-ethical-aspects/
  6. Malay Kumar Ganguly vs Sukumar Mukherjee & Ors on 7 August, 2009
  7. Nandimath, OV. Consent and medical treatment: The legal paradigm in India. Indian J Urol. 2009 Jul-Sep; 25[3]: 343?347.
  8. Gupta, UC. Perspect Clin Res. 2013 Jan-Mar; 4[1]: 26?32.
  9. Roberts, LW. Informed Consent and the Capacity for Voluntarism. Am J Psychiatry 2002; 159:705?712]
  10. Palmer, BW. Harmell, AL. Assessment of Healthcare Decision-making Capacity. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2016 Sep; 31[6]: 530?540.
  11. Hammami, M.M., Al-Jawarneh, Y., Hammami, M.B. et al. Information disclosure in clinical informed consent: reasonable patients perception of norm in high-context communication culture. BMC Med Ethics 15, 3 [2014]
  12. Canterbury v. Spence - 150 U.S. App. D.C. 263, 464 F.2d 772 [1972]
  13. Yousuf, RM.,Fauzi, ARM., How, SH.,Rasool, AG., Rohana, K. Awareness, knowledge, and attitude towards informed consent among doctors in two different cultures in Asia: a cross sectional comparative study in Malaysia and Kashmir, India. Singapore Med J. 2007;48: 559-65.
  14. Gupta VV, Bhat N, Asawa K, Tak M, Bapat S, Chaturvedi P. Knowledge and Attitude Toward Informed Consent Among Provate Dental Practitioners in Bhatinda City, Punjab, India. Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives Volume 6, issue 2, April 2015, Pages 73-78.
  15. Kumar, S., Mohanraj, R., Rose, A., Paul, M., Thomas, G. . [2016]. How informed is informed consent? Findings from a study in South India. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 9 [3], 180.
  16. Jackson E, Warner J. How much do doctors know about consent and capacity? J R Soc Med. 2002;95: 598-600
  17. Lamont S, Stewart C, Chiarella M. [2017]. Capacity and Consent: Knowledge and practice of legal and healthcare standards. Nursing ethics. 26. 969733016687162.
  18. Jain A, Banzal RK, Pandey R, Yadav J. Written Informed Consent: Is it Practiced what is Being Preached? J Indian Acad Forensic Med. October-December 2015, Vol.37, No.4.
  19. Ram Bihari Lal vs Dr. J.N. Shrivastava on 14 December, 1984
  20. Parmanand Katara v Union of India. AIR 1989 SC 2039.
  21. TT Thomas [Dr.] vs Elisa. AIR 1987 Ker. 52.
  22. Samira Kohli vs Dr. Prabha Manchanda & Anr on 16 January, 2008
  23. Sanjay Gadekar vs Sangamitra @ Sandhya Khobragade on 20 May, 2016
  24. Qamar Jahan & Anr. vs Dr. Nisar Ahmed Tyagi & Ors. on 17 December, 2019
  25. Fortis Escort Hospital vs Amarjeet Singh on 22 September, 2017
  26. Ramesh Chandra Agrawal vs Regency Hospital Ltd. & Ors on 11 September, 2009
  27. Mathers N., Fox N. and Hunn A. Surveys and Questionnaires. The NIHR RDS for the East Midlands / Yorkshire & the Humber, 2007.
  28. Will fuzzy laws and frivolous cases change the way medicine is practiced in India?. Dutta, D. October 9,2014. Issue Date October 20,2014.
  29. Jha, A., Larizgoitia, I., Audera-Lopez, C., Prasopa-Plaizier, N., Waters, H., Bates, D. [2013]. The Global Burden of Unsafe Medical Care: Analytic Modelling of Observational Studies. BMJ quality & safety. 22. 809-15. 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001748.
  30. Crombie IK, Davies HTO. Research in Health Care. A practical approach to the design, conduct and interpretation of health services research, 216. Chichester: John Wiley; 1996.
  31. Singh, Dr J., Bhushan, V. Medical Negligence and Compensation. Updated 4th Edition.
  32. Herring J. Organ Donation and the Ownership of Body Parts . In: Medical Law and Ethics. 6th ed. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2016. p. 437
  33. Charlesworth & Percy on Negligience, 11th edition 2006, p. 108.
  34. Chinnaiyan vs. Sri. Gokuldam Hospital and Anr on 25 September 2006. III? [2007]. CPJ? 228 NC.? Available from: http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/1919829 [Accessed on? 2020 February 1].
  35. Re F [Mental Patient: Sterilisation], [1990] 2 AC 1 at 52.
  36. Herring J. Consent to Treatment . In: Medical Law and Ethics. 4th ed. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 149-220.
  37. St Georges Healthcare NHS Trust v S., [1998] 3 All ER 673.

[Debangana Adhikari and Indraneel Dasgupta (2020); COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF KNOWLEDGE ABOUT CAPACITY AND CONSENT AMONGST DOCTORS WORKING IN PRIVATE AND GOVERNMENT SECTORS IN INDIA Int. J. of Adv. Res. 8 (Feb). 483-512] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Dr Debangana Adhikari
Institue Of Emergency Medicine,Peerless hospital,Kolkata

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/10485      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/10485

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 6 | No. of Views: 41