SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS AFFECTING WOMENS ATTITUDES TOWARDS ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY IN SAUDI ARABIA

- Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
- Abstract
- Keywords
- References
- Cite This Article as
- Corresponding Author
Background: To determine the socio-demographic factors affecting womens attitudes toward assisted reproductive technology (ART) in Saudi Arabia. Methods: This questionnaire-based study was conducted between February and May 2018 and targeted females living across all regions of Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire was designed to investigate the knowledge, attitudes, practice and quality of life of women towards ART and consisted of three parts including 35 questions. Pearson Chi-square test was used to compare qualitative differences between variables. Results: A total of 730 women accepted to participate in this survey (response rate, 94.4%). Approximately 94.5% of the respondents had heard about ART. The knowledge, altitude, practice and quality of life scores were good in 99.0%, 90.5%, 55.9% and 48.8%, respectively. Respondents with a longer marriage duration (p = 0.038) or those who felt bad about having ART (p = 0.008) were more likely to believe that ART more frequently fails than succeeds. Conversely, educated women (p = 0.001), those who believed regulations for infertility treatment were lax (p = 0.022), those working in the medical field (p = 0.003), and women who had heard about ART (p = 0.007) were more likely to believe that ART more frequently succeeds than fails. Conclusion: According to our findings, ART is largely acceptable among population included in this study. Socio-demographic factors such as marriage duration, educational level, or profession should be considered when treating couples with infertility problems.
- Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, Dyer S, Racowsky C, de Mouzon J, Sokol R, Rienzi L, Sunde A, Schmidt L, Cooke ID: The international glossary on infertility and fertility care, 2017. Human reproduction. 2017, 32:1786-1801. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex234.
- Mascarenhas MN, Flaxman SR, Boerma T, Vanderpoel S, Stevens GA: National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: a systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. PLoS medicine. 2012, 9:e1001356. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001356.
- Organization WH: Global prevalence of infertility, infecundity and childlessness. 2015.
- Kissin DM, Adamson GD, Chambers G, De Geyter C: Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance. Cambridge University Press; 2019. https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/infertility/burden/en/
- da Silva SG, Bertoldi AD, da Silveira MF, Domingues MR, Evenson KR, dos Santos IS: Assisted reproductive technology. Revista de Sa?de P?blica. 2019, 53:13-13. https://doi.org/10.11606/S1518-8787.2019053000737
- Serour GI, Serour AG: Ethical issues in infertility. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017, 43:21-31. d doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.02.008.
- Sunderam S, Kissin DM, Crawford SB, Folger SG, Jamieson DJ, Warner L, Barfield WD: Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2014. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017, 66:1-24. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6606a1.
- Webair HH, Ismail TAT, Ismail SB: Patient-centered infertility care from an Arab perspective: A review study. Middle East Fertility Society Journal. 2018, 23:8-13.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mefs.2017.10.003
- Keramat A, Masoomi SZ, Mousavi SA, Poorolajal J, Shobeiri F, Hazavhei SM: Quality of life and its related factors in infertile couples. J Res Health Sci. 2014, 14:57-63.PMID:24402852
- Facchin F, Somigliana E, Busnelli A, Catavorello A, Barbara G, Vercellini P: Infertility-related distress and female sexual function during assisted reproduction. Human Reproduction. 2019, 34:1065-1073. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez046.
- Fortin C, Abele S: Increased Length of Awareness of Assisted Reproductive Technologies Fosters Positive Attitudes and Acceptance among Women. Int J Fertil Steril. 2016, 9:452-464. doi: 10.22074/ijfs.2015.4603
- Collins SC, Chan E: Sociocultural determinants of US women's ethical views on various fertility treatments. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017, 35:669-677. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.08.015
- Afshani SA, Abdoli AM, Hashempour M, Baghbeheshti M, Zolfaghari M: The attitudes of infertile couples towards assisted reproductive techniques in Yazd, Iran: A cross sectional study in 2014. Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd). 2016, 14:761-768. PMID: 28066835 PMCID: PMC5203691
- General Authority for Statistics in Saudi Arabia. Available from: https://www.stats.gov.sa/ar/5680. 2019.
- Papaharitou S, Nakopoulou E, Moraitou M, Hatzimouratidis K, Hatzichristou D: Reproductive health and midwives: does occupational status differentiate their attitudes on assisted reproduction technologies from those of the general population? Hum Reprod. 2007, 22:2033-2039. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem086.
[Mona S. Khojah, Almaha A. Atafi, Ethar M. Banamah, Slwan A. Alrabaei, Sondos A. Kenani and Hassan Salah Abduljabbar (2020); SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS AFFECTING WOMENS ATTITUDES TOWARDS ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY IN SAUDI ARABIA Int. J. of Adv. Res. 8 (Feb). 964-972] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com
Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia