Vol. 8 (02) pp. 1268-1285 DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/10576

FACTOR ANALYSIS IN SEISMOLOGY

  • Institute of Geology and Seismology of Moldova, Chisinau.
34 Downloads 113 Views
Crossref

Abstract

Factor analysis allows us to explore the structure of the relationship of variables, where each group of variables will be determined by the factor according to which these variables have maximum loads. The result of factor analysis is a transition from a set of input parameters to a smaller number of variables, called factors. The factor is interpreted as a hidden variable - the cause of joint variability (interrelation) of several initial parameters. A method for calculating of the attenuation function values is proposed. On the basis of the obtained values, the seismic hazard is calculated as the probability that for a fixed time t at points of the earth's surface Q(φ, ψ) n seismic shocks occur, of which m will have intensity Ik of the MSK-64 scale. The method is used to study the seismicity of the Foci Vrancea and earthquakes of Romania. Seismic processes are complex and diverse, since their formation is due to complex, diverse geological and geophysical processes occurring in the bowels of the Earth, and is characterized by many different parameters, and the results of observations on them are represented as multidimensional random variables. In the study of such multiparameter processes, the question arises: is it possible to discard some of the parameters, or replace them with a smaller number of some functions of them, while retaining all the information? To solve this problem is a factor analysis [Bakhtin, at al., 2007]. Factor analysis is based on determining the minimum number of factors that make up the largest share in the variance of the data [Harman, 1972]. In the study of the complex nature of seismicity, factor analysis helps to better understand the essence of seismic processes, since the interdependence between seismic parameters must be due to relationships between parameters, the identification of which is the task of factor analysis.

Keywords

Article Analytics

References

  1. I. Bakhtin, N.M. Nizamutdinov, N.M. Khasanova, E.M. Nureyeva, factor analysis in geology
  2. Kazan, 2007, 32.
  3. Burtiev Rashid, Seismic Hazard Assessment Method Based on the Stochastic Models of Seismicity, Bulletin of the International Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering,
  4. 51, 2017, Tsukuba, Japan, 22-38.
  5. G. Gabrielyan, Econometrics, Vidnoe, 2008, 85.
  6. D. Januzakov Regional Attenuation Features intensity of shocks of strong earthquakes of Kyrgyzstan and adjacent areas. Bulletin of the Institute of Seismology, NAS KR No. 2. Bishkek. 2013, 11?16.
  7. Ismail-Zadeh, A., Sokolov, V. and Bonjer, K., Tectonic stress, seismicity, and seismic hazard in the southeastern Carpathians, Nat. Hazards, Springer, 2007, 1-22.
  8. Lindsay I Smith, A Tutorial on Principal Components Analysis, 2002,26.
  9. Kronrod Tatiana, Panza Giuliano, Radulian Mirchea: Integrated transnational macroseismic data set for the strongest earthquakes of Vrancea (Romania). ?issues.pangaea.de/browse/PDI?3917,
  10. Tectonophysics, 2012, 271?282
  11. Mkhitaryan V.S., Arkhipova M.Yu., Sirotin V.P., Econometrics, Moscow, 2008, 142
  12. Inheritances A. IBM SPSS Statistics 20 and AMOS: Professional Statistics data analysis, St. Petersburg,
  13. Electronic textbook on statistics StatSoft.Main components and factor analysis. URL: ttp: //www.statsoft.ru/home/textbook/modules/stfacan.html
  14. Harman G. Modern factor analysis. M., 1972.
  15. Rautian T.G. et al. Macroseismic manifestation of earthquakes and focal spectra. Engineering seismology issues; issue 23. Moscow. The Nauka, 1982. 74?82.
  16. Shebalin N.V. The intensity, magnitude and depth of the earthquake source. Earthquakes in the USSR, Moscow, Science, 1961, 126?138.
  17. Shebalin, Seismic zoning of the USSR, 1980.

How to Cite This Article

R.Z. Burtiev, V.G. Alcaz, S.V. Troian and V.Yu. Kardanets (2020); FACTOR ANALYSIS IN SEISMOLOGY, Int. J. of Adv. Res., 8 (02), 1268-1285, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/10576

Corresponding Author

Burtiev Rashid
Institute of Geology and Seismology of Moldova, Chisinau