RECONSTRUCTION OF CRIMINAL SANCTIONS ON ILLEGAL PLANTATION HARVEST ACCORDING TO LAW NO. 39 OF 2014 BASED ON JUSTICE VALUE

  • Doctorate Student of Faculty of Law Sultan Agung Islamic University Semarang.
  • Faculty of Law Sultan Agung Islamic University Semarang, Indonesia.
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • How to Cite This Article
  • Corresponding Author

Indonesia is a prosperous country, but in reality, not all people enjoy the welfare, such as from plantation products, for example, there are still many who have not been able to enjoy it until it leads to the theft of plantation products. This makes the writer interested to study it related to the weaknesses of the regulations governing plantation theft in Indonesia today and how its reconstruction. The study was done using the constructivism paradigm and the type of research is a qualitative study with a socio-legal approach. Research shows that criminal sanctions in Law Number 39 of 2014 concerning Plantations, especially in Article 107 paragraph (3) are not yet based on justice due to the absence of minimum sanctions applied in the article so that it does not cause a deterrent effect on the perpetrators of crimes so that the reconstruction of Article 107 paragraph (3) Law Number 39 of 2014 plantations by formulating the existence of minimum sanctions against perpetrators of crimes in order to realize legal certainty and justice. Even though the concept of justice, especially in the current criminal sanctions raises a variety of interpretations and there are no benchmarks to ensure the existence of justice.


  1. Mukti Arto,(2001),Mencari Keadilan (Kritik Dan Solusi Terhadap Praktik. Peradilan Perdata di Indonesia),Yogyakarta :Pustaka Pelajar Offset,,p.98-99
  2. Faisal,(2010), Menerobos Positivisme Hukum, Rangkang Education, Yogyakarta.
  3. Herbert L. Packer,(1968), The Limits of The Criminal Sanction, California, Stanford University Press, p.37
  4. Johnny Ibrahim,(2005), Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Bayumedia, Surabaya.
  5. Moleong,(2002), Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, PT RemajaRosdakarya, Bandung.
  6. Sholehuddin,(2004), Sistem Sanksi dalam Hukum Pidana: Ide Dasar Doble Track System & Implementasinya, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, p.59.
  7. Sudikno Mertokusumo, Mengenal Hukum: Suatu Pengantar, Ed. Ke-3, Yogyakarta: Liberti, tahun 1988, p.167.
  8. Teguh Prasetyo, Kadawarti Budiharjo, Purwadi,(2013), Hukum Dan Undang-Undang Perkebunan, Bandung, Penebit Nusamedia, p.57.
  9. Yudistira Rusydi , (2011), Criminal Law Enforcement Against Forest Wood Theft in Musi Banyu Asin District , Pandecta Vol 6, No.1 Year 2011.
  10. https://www.tuk.or.id/2015/12/02/problema-uu-perkebunan-bagi-para-petani-dan-masyarakat-adat/ accessed on 20 July 2019.

Doni Setha, Gunarto and Sri Endah Wahyuningsih (2020); RECONSTRUCTION OF CRIMINAL SANCTIONS ON ILLEGAL PLANTATION HARVEST ACCORDING TO LAW NO. 39 OF 2014 BASED ON JUSTICE VALUE, Int. J. of Adv. Res., 8 (02), 1365-1373, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/10587


Toebagus Galang
Universitas PGRI Semarang

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/10587      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/10587