20Mar 2020

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF MICROLEAKAGE OF DIFFERENT DENTIN REPLACEMENT MATERIALS

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Microleakage can lead to staining around the margins of restorations postoperative sensitivity secondary caries restoration failure pulpal pathology or pulpal death partial or total loss of restoration. Microleakage is usually associated with invasion from the external environment through the margins of the restoration but microleakage can also occur internally.This study was carried out to evaluate in vitro the microleakage of four different dentin replacement materials ie.Group I - Glass inomer cement Group II - Smart dentin replacement Group III - BiodentineGroup IV - MTA Angelus. On 60 samples class V cavity was prepared using a templete. Restoration was done following standard protocol. All samples were sectioned into two halves in buccolingual direction with a water-cooled slow speed diamond saw using air motor. Sample were viewed under Scanning Electron Microscope (100X) and stereomicroscope (40X).Photomicrographs were evaluated for both total length and adapted margin in mm. All the materials considered in study showed gaps. But the highest marginal adaptability (%) 95.70?1.29 % and least microleakage 0.40?0.51 was shown by Group II followed by Group III 80.13?5.67 %. So that we can say that the group which have maximum marginal adaptability showed least microleakage and vice versa.


  1. Alani AH and Toh CG. (1997):Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: a review. Operative Dentistry22:173-185.
  2. El-Nawawy M. ?Koraitim L Abouelatta OHanan Hegazi. (2012):Marginal Adaptation of Nanofilled Packable and Hybrid Dental Composite Resins Stored in Artificial Saliva. Biomed Eng.2:105-114.
  3. Fabianelli?A Pollington S Davidson CL Cagidiaco MC Goracci C. (2007): The?relevance?of?microleakage studies. Int Dent?SA.. Jun9(3):64-74. [Google Scholar].
  4. Gupta KV Verma P and Trivedi A.(2011): Evaluation of microleakage of various restorative materials: An in vitro study. Life Sci. J.3:29-33.
  5. Gupta SK Gupta J Saraswathi V. BallalVasudev Acharya Shashi Rashmi(2012): Comparative evaluation of microleakage in Class V cavities using various glass ionomer cements: An?in vitro J. Interdiscip. Dentistry2:164-169.
  6. Hilton TJ. (1998):Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Transactions Academy of Dental Materials12:21-71.
  7. Krejci I and Lutz F.(1991): Marginal adaptation of class V restorations using different restorative techniques. J. Dent.19:24-32.
  8. Mali P. Deshpande S. and Singh A. (2006):Microleakage of restorative materials: An in vitro J. Indian Soc. Pedod. Prev. Dent.22:154-159.
  9. Niranjan B Shashikiran ND Singla S Thakur R Dubey A Maran S. (2016):A comparative microleakage evaluation of three different base materials in Class I cavity in deciduous molars in sandwich technique using dye penetration and dentin surface interface by scanning electron microscope. J Indian SocPedodPrev Dent34:324‑30
  10. Raskin A D Hoore W Gonthier SDegrange MD?jou J.(2001)Reliability of in vitro microleakage tests: A literature review. Adhes. Dent.3:295-308.

[Divya Chowdhary, Ramesh Chandra, Shailja Singh, Supratim Tripathi, Jyoti Jain and Urvashi Ojha (2020); COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF MICROLEAKAGE OF DIFFERENT DENTIN REPLACEMENT MATERIALS Int. J. of Adv. Res. 8 (Mar). 593-598] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


urvashi ojha
Carrer post graduate institute of dental sciences and hospital

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/10669      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/10669