A STUDY ON PIRFENIDONE VERSUS NINTEDANIB IN PATIENTS WITH IDIOPATHIC PULMONARY FIBROSIS IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL: A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Santhiram Medical College and General Hospital, Nandyal.
Abstract
Background: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic condition with a poor prognosis and have an average life expectancy of 3-4 years. Two antifibrotic treatments have been approved to treat IPF: nintedanib and pirfenidone. These medications lower the decline in lung function and lower the risk of acute respiratory deterioration, which is linked with a high morbidity and death.Individual clinical trials have not been powered to demonstrate mortality decreases, however analysis of pooled data from clinical trials and observational research imply that anti-fibrotic drugs increase life expectancy.
This study describes the utility of anti-fibrotic drugs and compare their efficacy.
Methods and Materials: This 6 month cross-sectional study conducted at Santhiram Medical College and General Hospital in Nandyal.In patients with IPF , Clinical, functional and radiological data were gathered at baseline and during the follow-up, as per our Center procedure.This study compares and evaluates the efficacy of nintedanib and pirfenidone. A total of 40 patients over the age of 18 with IPF diagnosis were included. Patients under 18 years , those with known fibrosing lung diseases, bronchial asthma, COPD, HIV, Tuberculosis, or other organ failures were excluded.
Results: At baseline, IPF patients treated with Pirfenidone had Forced vital capacity(FVC) and Forced expiratory volume at 1 second(FEV1) predicted percentages of 63.57 ± 8.34% and 72.31 ± 4.91%, respectively. In IPF patients treated with Nintedanib, at baseline(time 0), FVC and FEV1 percentages were 60.15±8.82% and 72.31±4.91% respectively. There were no significant variations in FVC and FEV1 percentages at time 0 between patients treated with the two medications (p=0.23,p=0.7,respectively).
At 3-month follow-up, patients treated with Pirfenidone had predicted FVC and FEV1 values of 65.73 ± 7.84% and 72.94 ± 4.45%, respectively, whereas patients treated with Nintedanib had predicted valuesof 65.75 ± 7.67% and 72.42 ± 4.45%.
At 6-month follow-up, patients on Pirfenidone had predicted FVC and FEV1 values of 66.9 ± 8.72% and 73.5 ± 4.50%, respectively. Nintedanib treatment resulted in 67.7±8.46% and 72.94±4.51% outcomes.
Conclusion: our study shown that pirfenidone and nintedanib are equally effective at reducing FVC decline over a 6-month time frame.While nintedanib was slightly more beneficial in lowering FVC decline during the 6-month period. Both drugs were well tolerated, while nintedanib showing good tolerance in the majority of IPF patients.
Keywords
Article Analytics
How to Cite This Article
Y. Priyanka Sharoon and P. Chakradhar (2024); A STUDY ON PIRFENIDONE VERSUS NINTEDANIB IN PATIENTS WITH IDIOPATHIC PULMONARY FIBROSIS IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL: A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY, Int. J. of Adv. Res., 12 (09), 1632-1639, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/19603
Corresponding Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





