RETHINKING THE ROLE OF PREDATORY JOURNALS AND PAPER MILLS IN ACADEMIC PUBLISHING: A RESPONSE TO SYSTEMIC PRESSURES
Abstract
This paper examines both the negative and unexpected positive impacts associated with the rise of predatory journals and paper mills, considering the complex structural pressures that have cultivated a publishing ecosystem where fraudulent research thrives. Despite their unethical practices, these entities address critical issues facing academia, including financial barriers, publication delays, and a high-stakes emphasis on publishing quantity over quality. This paper argues that predatory journals and paper mills have proliferated due to a demand created by institutional requirements, financial hurdles posed by major journals, and the monopolistic tendencies of high-impact journals. In examining these issues, this paper calls for rethinking the current publishing framework and advocates for reform to reduce the demand for predatory practices and create a more inclusive research environment.
How to Cite This Article
Chrison Tom Joseph, Akanksha D., Sonu Treesa Antony, Abhilash Aditya G. and Vinaykumar S. Appanavar (2024); RETHINKING THE ROLE OF PREDATORY JOURNALS AND PAPER MILLS IN ACADEMIC PUBLISHING: A RESPONSE TO SYSTEMIC PRESSURES, International Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR), 12 (10), 1482-1484, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/19778
Corresponding Author
Article Analytics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





