Vol. 13 (06) pp. 1837-1843 DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/21253

MATERNAL AND NEONATAL OUTCOMES IN EMERGENCY VERSUS ELECTIVE LSCS: A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

, and
  • Junior Resident.
  • Assistant Professor.
  • Professor
14 Downloads 61 Views
Crossref

Download Full Paper (PDF)

Abstract

Background: Caesarean section preferred as an emergency or elective procedure are entirely different entities according to the measures taken, facilities and skilled staff available, and preparation done. Complications are greater in emergencies compared with elective caesarean section.

Objectives:To evaluate the maternal and neonatal outcomes in emergency LSCS versus elective LSCS performed at our hospital

Method: The present retrospective study included all patients underwent caesarean section at Akash hospital between Dec 2022 to May 2023. Maternal and perinatal outcomes were compared between groups.

Conclusions: Our study highlights the clinical distinctions in perinatal outcomes, indications, and consequences between elective and emergency LSCS. There are fewer problems with elective LSCS than with emergency LSCS, and the fetal prognosis is better in the elective group.

Keywords

Article Analytics

How to Cite This Article

Kiran Eshwar, RamyaK. and Kala K. (2025); MATERNAL AND NEONATAL OUTCOMES IN EMERGENCY VERSUS ELECTIVE LSCS: A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY, Int. J. of Adv. Res., 13 (06), 1837-1843, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/21253

Corresponding Author

dr. Kiran Eshwar
Junior resident
India
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.