COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF SINGLE DRILLING SYSTEM VERSUS CONVENTIONAL IMPLANT SITE PREPARATION IN THE POSTERIOR MAXILLA
- Master Student of Periodontology and Oral Medicine, Department of Periodontology and Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Egypt.
- Lecturer of Periodontology and Oral Medicine, Department of Periodontology and Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Egypt.
- Professor of Fixed Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University and Mansoura National University (MNU) Egypt.
- Professor of Periodontology and Oral Medicine, Head of the Department of Periodontology and Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Egypt.
- Abstract
- Keywords
- How to Cite This Article
- Corresponding Author
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of two implant site preparation techniques single drill and conventional drilling on implant stability and marginal bone loss following implant placement in the posterior maxilla.
Materials And Methods: A total of 20 patients aged 20-50 years with missing teeth in the posterior maxilla were included in this study. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups: Group I (single-drill technique) and Group II (conventional drilling technique), with 10 patients in each group. Implant stability was assessed using resonance frequency analysis (ISQ), while marginal bone loss was evaluated radiographically after six months.
Mohammed Ahmed Alzahrani et, al (2026); COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF SINGLE DRILLING SYSTEM VERSUS CONVENTIONAL IMPLANT SITE PREPARATION IN THE POSTERIOR MAXILLA, Int. J. of Adv. Res., 14 (03), 468-480, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/22964
Master Student of Periodontology and Oral Medicine, Department of Periodontology and Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Egypt.
Egypt
