01Jul 2019


  • Institute of African Tropical Ophthalmology, Bamako, Mali.
  • University Bordeaux 2 (EA 3677 et Centre Ren? Labusqui?re) Bordeaux, France.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Objectives:To compare, in the region of Mopti in Mali, the cost and effectiveness of a proximity surgery strategy (advanced surgery close to the patients? residence) with surgery practised in a traditional ophthalmology centre (fixed surgery in a hospital environment). Methods:Two samples of 199 and 100 people operated on for cataract in the advanced and fixed strategies respectively, were included in this study. Results:The functional results were excellent since, after correction, 92.5% of the advanced, and 98% of the fixed, surgery patients had a vision higher than or equal to 6/19. The rate of patients? satisfaction was 96% for advanced surgery and 89% for fixed surgery. From a societal point of view, the advanced strategy was slightly less costly with a unit cost of 96.2 US$ compared to 96.9 US $ in the fixed strategy. On the other hand, advanced surgery was much cheaper (26.6 US$ vs. 36.5 US$) for the patient and their family because of reduced transportation costs and patient and attendant opportunity cost in terms of time. Conclusion:Operating patients using a proximity surgery strategy, whereby a regional ophthalmic team is mobilised at the district level, appears to be as cost effective as a classical fixed strategy. This innovative strategy should allow, if extended to all Malian regions, most patients needing surgery to be operated on.

  1. Wang w, yan w, m?ller a, he m. A global view on output and outcomes of cataract surgery with national indices of socioeconomic development.invest ophthalmol vis sci. 2017,1;58(9):3669-3676.
  2. Wang w, yan w, m?ller a, keel s, he m. Association of socioeconomics with prevalence of visual impairment and blindness.jama ophthalmol. 2017, 1;135(12):1295-1302.
  3. Mansur m rabiu .cataract blindness and barriers to uptake of cataract surgery in a rural community of northern nigeria. British journal of ophthalmology, 2001 85: 776-780.
  4. Sch?mann jf, bakayoko s.traditional couching is not an effective alternative procedure for cataract surgery in mali. Ophthalmic epidemiology, 2000, 7:271-283.
  5. Singh a, garner p, floyd k .cost-effectiveness of public-funded options for cataract surgery mysore, india. The lancet., 2000,355: 180-4.
  6. Shrestha jk, pradhna ym,? snellingen t.outcomes of extracapsular surgery in eye camps of eastern nepal. British journal of ophthalmology, 2001,85: 648-652.
  7. Abhay r vasavada and vaishali a vasavada. Managing the posterior polar cataract: an update. Indian j ophthalmol. 2017; 65(12): 1350?1358.
  8. M a isawumi, eo soetan, ao adeoye, and c o adeoti. Evaluation of cataract surgery outcome in western nigeria . Ghana med j. 2009; 43(4): 169?174.
  9. Prajna nv, chnadrakanth ks, kim r et al.the madurai intraocular lens study ii: clinical outcomes. American journal of ophthalmology, 1998,125:14-25.
  10. Ruit s, tabin gc, nissman sa et al. Low cost high volume cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation in nepal. Ophthalmology, 1999,106: 1887-92.
  11. Malik a r, qazi za, gilbert c.visual outcome after high volume cataract surgery in pakistan. British journal of ophthalmology, 2003,87:937-40.
  12. Murthy gv, sharma p.cost analysis of eye camp and camp based cataract surgery. National medical journal of india,1994, 7: 111-4.
  13. Marseille e, gilbert s.the cost of cataract surgery in a public health eye care program in nepal. Health policy, 1996,35:145-154.
  14. Balthussen r, sylla m, mariotti s.cost-effectiveness analysis of cataract surgery?: a global and regional analysis. Bulletin of the world health organization,2004,82:338-346.

[Seydou Bakayoko, Rodrigue R.Elien g.y., Jeremy Koita and Jean Francois Schemann. (2019); MOBILISING A MOBILE SURGICAL TEAM AT THE DISTRICT LEVEL: A COST EFFECTIVE STRATEGY FOR CATARACT SURGERY IN MALII. VISUAL ACUITY OUTCOMES AND COST STUDY. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 7 (7). 42-51] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

ELIEN G Y R Rodrigue


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/9323       DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/9323

Share this article