01Jul 2019


  • Ph.d. Asistant Professor, English Grammar Department, Azerbaijan University of Languages, Baku, Azerbaijan.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

We illustrate a novel conception of linguistic invariant which applies to grammars of different natural languages even though they may use different categories and have different rules. We illustrate formally how semantically defined notions, such as ?is an anaphor? may be invariant in all linguistically motivated grammars (the issue is an empirical one), and we show that individual morphemes, such as case markers, may be invariant in grammars. One basic fact that we need to keep in mind when discussing differences between American and British grammar is that they are rarely categorical. As a rule, they can be expressed as proportions or probabilities. We might say that, most of the time, American and British speakers have the same grammars, with the same inventory of forms and the same rules, but that the application of the rules differs between varieties. Capturing this variation is the goal of most of the research in this field.

  1. Aaron, Jessi. (2010). Pushing the envelope: Looking beyond the variable context. Language variation and change 22(1):1-36.
  2. Bailey, Charles-James N. (1973). Variation and linguistic theory. Arlington: Center for Applied Linguistics. 117-141.
  3. Brinton, Laurel J. & Leslie K. Arnovick. (2005). The English language: A linguistic history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. Chambers, J.K. (2002). Studying language variation: An informal epistemology.
  5. Curme, G. 1976. Syntax. New York: Academic Press.
  6. Edward L. Keenan, Edward P. Stabler. Language Variation and Linguistic Invariants. UCLA, 2009
  7. Fillmore, Ch. 1963. \"The Case for Case\", in Bach, E., Harms, R. (eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory, Holt Rinehart and Winston, pp. 1-88
  8. Fries, Charles. 1963. The Structure of English, An Introduction to the Construction of English Sentences. New York: Harcourt Brace
  9. Jesperson, O. 1933. Essentials of English Grammar. London
  10. Jesperson, O. 1961. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. London: Allen and Unwin
  11. Leonie Cornips & Karen Corrigan (Eds.), Syntax and variation: Reconciling the biological and the social. Amsterdam. 149-177.
  12. Lyons, John. 1968. Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[Farida Allahverdieva. (2019); THE LANGUAGE VARIATION OF THE LINGUISTIC INVARIANTS. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 7 (7). 84-91] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Farida Allahvverdiyeva
English language teacher, a researcher


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/9328       DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/9328

Share this article