01Apr 2020

THE HYPOTHESIS OF THE PREDETERMINATION OF INDIVIDUAL PSYCHO-PHYSICAL CAPACITIES

  • Faculty of Education, Universiti, St. Kliment Ohridski - Bitola, North Macedonia.
  • Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, Universiti of Belgrade, R. Serbia.
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

This paper shall open an opportunity to make an attempt to open a marginalized discussion of the notion of science and the temporal sustainability of stochastic laws in the field of social sciences. A new interpretation shall be provided through a comparative analogy, with a view to revising current scientific attitudes and their social implementation. The views that the psycho-physical capacities of an individual, can be extended to a certain extent, through an influence of a scientific knowledge and a wider social environment is disputed. We believe that the personal capacities inherited by birth, limit the potential for the impact of a scientific knowledge and a social environment, minimizing their impact to negligible. Our approach is expressed in the view that a science is a cognitive-developmental reality, subject to a constant substantive changes, not a value system of interpretations and defined thinking orientations.


  1. Achtziger, A., Gollwitzer, P. M. (2008). Motivation and volition in the course of action. In: Heckhausen J, Heckhausen H, editors. Motivation and action. New York, Cambridge University Press, 272-295.
  2. Aspinwall, L.G., Richter, L. (1999). Optimism and self-mastery predict more rapid disengagement from unsolvable tasks in the presence of alternatives. Motivation and Emotion 23: 221-245.
  3. Burt, A. S. (2009). Are there meaningful etiological differences within antisocial behavior? Results of a meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review 29: 163-178.
  4. Baltes, P.B., Lindenberger, U., Staudinger, U. M. (1998). Life-span theory in developmental psychology. In: Damon W, Lerner RM, editors. Handbook of child psychology. 5. New York, 1029-1143.
  5. Caspi, A., McClay, J., Moffitt, T.E., Mill, J., Martin, J., Craig, I.W. (2002) Role of geno-type in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science 297: (851-854).
  6. Ebner, N.C., Freund, A.M., Baltes, P.B. (2006). Developmental changes in personal goal orientation from young to late adulthood: From striving for gains to maintenance and prevention of losses. Psychology and Aging 21: 664-678.
  7. Lippi, G., Longo, G. (2009). Genetics and sports. British medical bulletin 93: 27-47
  8. Kuka, (2004). Description of Internally motivated behavio, Belgrade
  9. Kuka, (2007). Intelligence & Critical Thinking, Belgrade
  10. Kuka,, Jovanović, K., Talevski, J. (2013). New Conceptions of Educational Systems in the Function of Projecting School of the Future, JO? Journals of USA - China education review A & B, EL Monte/USA, 703-708.
  11. Kuka, M., Jovanović, K., Talevski, J. (2013). Projecting the New Strategies of Education System, 4th Conference: Asia regional open courseware and open education conference, Bangkok/Thailand, 152-1
  12. Larsson, H. Andershed, H. Lichtenstein, P. (2006). A genetic factor explains most of the variation in the psychopathic personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 115: 221-230.
  13. Montgomery, E., Marshall, R., Hemingway, H. (1998). Human gene for physical performance. Nature 393: 221-222.
  14. Tucker, R., Collins, M. (2012). What makes champions? A review of the relative contribution of genes and training to sporting success. British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[Miroslav Kuka and Marko Krunic (2020); THE HYPOTHESIS OF THE PREDETERMINATION OF INDIVIDUAL PSYCHO-PHYSICAL CAPACITIES Int. J. of Adv. Res. 8 (Apr). 865-869] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


Miroslav Kuka
Faculty of Education, Universiti „St. Kliment Ohridski“ - Bitola, North Macedonia

Share this article