31Jan 2017

MAIN PREDICTORS AND TREATMENTS OF PERI-IMPLANTITE: BRIEF REVIEW

  • University Center North Paulista (Unorp) - Sao Jose do Rio Preto – SP, Brazil.
  • Post graduateandcontinuingeducation (Unipos), Street Ipiranga, 3460, São José do Rio Preto SP, Brazil 15020-040.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Background: About 3 million Americans have dental implants, and this number is growing at 500,000 every year. In this context, the microorganisms that reside on the surfaces of the implants and their prosthetic components are considered the main etiological factor for the peri-implantite. Objective: was todo a brief literary review, pointing out the main predictors of pri-implantite and treatments. Methods: This study is in the literature review focusing on the main predictors and treatments of peri-implantite. To this end, a survey was conducted in scientific articles in PubMed, Medline, Scielo, Lilacs and books. Discussion: Several uncertainties remain regarding peri-implant disease. Long-term follow-up of consecutively treated cases appears to be a realistic path for accumulating more information. The current clinical recommendations are that there is no consensus on the protocol for the treatment of mucositis or peri-implantitis due to the heterogeneous characteristics of different implant systems, implant position and other factors related to the patient. Thus, there is no individual treatment option. Conclusion: In the implant, if plaque accumulation is allowed for longer periods and the patient is at risk, peri-implant mucositis can progress to lesions with peri-implantite alveolar bone loss. The most important treatment of peri-implantitis is to interrupt progressive bone loss by plaque control, even restoring the bone lost through regenerative surgical procedures. 

1.       Tavares LJ, Pavarina AC, Vergani CE, de Avila ED. The impact of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy on peri-implant disease: What mechanisms are involved in this novel treatment? PhotodiagnosisPhotodynTher. 2016 Dec 6.pii: S1572-1000(16)30164-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2016.11.016.
2.       King E, Patel R, Patel A, Addy L. Should implants be considered for patients with periodontal disease? Br Dent J. 2016 Dec 9;221(11):705-711. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.905.
  1. Kanwar IL,Sah AK, Suresh PK1.Biofilm-mediated Antibiotic-resistant Oral Bacterial. Curr Pharm Des. 2016 Nov 24.
  2. Doornewaard R,Christiaens V, De Bruyn H, Jacobsson M, Cosyn J, Vervaeke S, Jacquet W. Long-Term Effect of Surface Roughness and Patients' Factors on Crestal Bone Loss at Dental Implants. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016 Nov 15. doi: 10.1111/cid.12457.
  3. John V,Shin D, Marlow A, Hamada Y. Peri-Implant Bone Loss and Peri-Implantitis: A Report of Three Cases and Review of the Literature. Case Rep Dent. 2016; 2491714. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
  4. Del Amo F SL,Faria E Almeida R, Cicciù M, Daugela P, Ramanauskaite A, Saulacic N, Tervonen T, Wang HL, Yu SH. The 1st Baltic Osseointegration Academy and Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Consensus Conference 2016. Summary and Consensus Statements: Group III - Peri-Implantitis  J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2016 Sep 9;7(3):e16.
  5. Lindhe, J. Et al. Experimental breakdown of pen-implant and periodontal tissues. A study in beagle dog. Clinical oral impints research. 3 p. 9-16, 1992.
  6. Mombelli, A. et al. Microbial aspects of implant dentistry. Periodontology 2000. 4, p.74-80, 1994.
  7. Gualine, F, Berglundh T. Immunohistochemicalcharasteristcs of inflammatory lesions at implants. J. Periodontol. v. 30 p. 14-18, 2003.
  8. Esposito, M. et al. Immunohitochemistry of soft tissues surounding late failures of branemark implants. Clinical oral impints research. 8 P. 352-366, 1997.
  9. Leljenberg, B. et al. Some microbiological, histopatological and immunohistochemicalcharacteristcs of progressive periodontal disease. J. Periodontol. v.21 p.720-727, 1994.
  10. Branemark et al. “Close to the Edge – Brånemark and the Development of Osseointegration” – McClarence, Elaine – Quintessence Books, cap. 1, Berlim, Alemanha, 2003).
  11. Weyant, RJ, Burt, BA. An assessement of survival rates and within-patient clustering of failures for endosseus oral implants. dent. Res. v.72, p.2-8, 1993.
  12. Pauleto, NC. et al. Effect of cigarette smoking on oral elastase ativity in adult periodontitis patients. periodontol. v.71, p.58-62, 2000.
  13. Winkelhoff, V. et al. Smoking affects the subgigival microflora in periodontitis. periodontol. v.72, p. 666-671, 2001.
  14. Bain CA, Moy PK. The association between the failure of dental implants and cigarette smoking. International J. of Oral and Maxilofacial Implants. 8, p. 609-615, 1993.
  15. Lindquist, LW et al. Association between marginal bone loss around osseintegrated mandibular implants and smoking habits. J. Res. v.76, p.1667-1674, 1997.
  16. Haas, R. et al. The relationship of smoking on pen-implant tissue.J. prosthet v.76, p.592-596, 1996.
  17. Fardal, O. et al. Severe, rapidly progressing peri-implantitis. J. Periodontol. v. 26, p. 313-317, 1999.
  18. Quirynen, M. et al. Pen-implant health around screw-shaped c.p. titaniun machined implants in partially edentulous patients with or without ongoing periodontitis. Clin oral implants res. 12 p.589-594, 2001.
  19. Wowren, W. N., Symptomatic osteoporosis. prosther dent. v.67, p.656-660, 1992.
  20. Wactawski et al. The role of osteopenia in oral bone loss and periodontal disease. periodontol. v.67, p.1076-1084, 1996.
  21. Tailor GW. et al. Non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus and alveolar bone loss progression over two years. periodontol. v. 69, p.76-83, 1998.
  22. Ericsson, I. et al. Radiographical and histological charateristics of submerged and nonsubmerged titanium implants. An experimental study in the labrador dog. Clinical Oral Implants Research, Copenhagen, v.7, n.1, p.20-26, 1996.
  23. Lang, N. P., et al. Biological complications with dental implants; their prevention, diagnosis and treatment. Clin oral impl. Res. 2000.,11, p. 146-155, 2000.
  24. Behneke,A. Et al.Treatment of peri-implantitis defects with autogeous bone wafts International J. of Oral and Maxilofacial Implants v.15,p. 125-138. 2000.

[Edmiane Fernanda Batista Monteiro de Carvalho, Tacyane Petrolli Alberici, Mariluciade Moraes Alves Moreira, Ana Paula Bernardes da Rosa Maluf Abbud, Carlos Alberto Costa Neves Buchala, Elias Naim Kassis and Idiberto Jose Zotarelli Filho. (2017); MAIN PREDICTORS AND TREATMENTS OF PERI-IMPLANTITE: BRIEF REVIEW Int. J. of Adv. Res. 5 (Jan). 2708-2713] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Idiberto José Zotarelli Filho
Unesp and Unipos São José do Rio Preto / SP / Brazil.

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/3063      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/3063

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 15 | No. of Views: 92