Vol. 5 (04) pp. 1707-1711 DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/4001

KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDE AND PRACTICE OF DENTAL ADHESIVE USE AMONG DENTAL PRACTITIONERS OF CHENNAI CITY- A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY.

  • II BDS student, Prosthodontics department, Saveetha Dental College, Chennai - 600 077.
18 Downloads 166 Views
Crossref

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the knowledge, attitude and practice of dental adhesive use among dental practitioners of Chennai city. Objective: A conflicted topic in both clinic practice and dental education is the use of adhesive and their roles in prosthodontics. The use of adhesive are known to be poor aids to provide retention to an ill fitting prosthesis by few dentists. These views have raised many conflicts among the dentists about the use of dental adhesive. Background: This study is done among 150 dental practitioners in the city of Chennai by circulating self administered questionnaires. Some questionnaires were also filled through online. The data will be reported in the SPSS online software to tabulate the percentages and mean. Method: The questionnaires were distributed among many dental clinics and also through online forms. The responses were recorded and the data imported to spss online software for the results. Reason: This study tries to solve the conflict idea between various dental practitioners regarding the use of dental adhesive and their role is prosthodontics. Result: A mixed response was obtained about the subjects knowledge about the denture adhesive. According to the attitude type questions average responses were elicited. However majority of them used denture adhesive in their practice.

Keywords

How to Cite This Article

Subashri A. (2017); KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDE AND PRACTICE OF DENTAL ADHESIVE USE AMONG DENTAL PRACTITIONERS OF CHENNAI CITY- A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY., International Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR), 5 (04), 1707-1711, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/4001

Corresponding Author

Subashri. A
Prosthodontics department, Saveetha Dental College Chennai - 600 077.

Article Analytics

References

  1. Goncalves, et al. Denture adhesives improve mastication in denture wearers. Int J Prosthodont 2014;27(2):140-146.
  2. Figueiral MH, et al. The effect of different adhesive materials on retention of maxillary complete dentures. Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc 2011;24(2):175-177.
  3. Ahlawat P, Darki HA, Zahir Y, Saini D. Survey on availability and usage of denture adhesives in Malaysia: a preliminary study. Asian J Pharma Hea Sci 2012;2(1):286-289.
  4. Ozcan M, Kulak Y, Arikan A, Silahtar E (2004) The attitude of complete denture wearers towards denture adhesives in Istanbul. J Oral Rehabil 31(2):131?134
  5. Tarbet WJ, Grossman E. Observations of denture-supporting tissue during six months of denture adhesive wearing. J Am Dent Assoc 1980;101:789-91.
  6. Grasso JE. Denture adhesives: Changing attitudes. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127:90-6.
  7. Musani Smita, Dugal Ramandeep, Kothavade Mukund (2010) A review of denture adhesives used in the dental profession. Annals and essences of dentistry 3:129?133
  8. Giulio Preti (2011) Prosthetic rehabilitation part II: technical procedures. Quintessence Publishing Co, Ltd. United Kingdom, p 103?104
  9. Psillakis JJ, Wright RF, Grbic JT, Lamster IB (2004) In practice evaluation of a denture adhesive using a gnathometer. J Prosth- odont Dec 13(4):244?250
  10. Kelsey CC, Lang BR, Wang RF (1997) Examining patients? responses about the effectiveness of five denture adhesive pastes. J Am Dent Assoc 128:1532?1538
  11. Slaughter A, Katz RV, Grasso JE (1999) Professional attitudes towards denture adhesive?a Delphi technique survey of aca- demic prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 82:80?89
  12. Stafford GD, Russel C (1971) Efficiency of denture adhesives and their possible influence on microorganisms. J Dent Res 50:832?836
  13. Tarbet WJ, Grossman E (1980) Observation of denture-support-ing tissue during six months of denture adhesive wearing. J Am Dent Assoc 101:789?791
  14. Adisman IK (1989) The use of denture adhesives as an aid to denture treatment. J Prosthet Dent 62:711?715
  15. Grasso SE (1996) Denture adhesives: changing attitudes. J Am Dent Assoc 127:90?96
  16. Shay K (1991) Denture adhesive. J Am Dent Assoc 122:70?76
  17. Lamb DJ (1980) Denture adhesives: a side effect. J Dent 8:35?42
  18. Nations SP, Boyer PJ, Love LA, Burritt MF, Butz JA, Wolfe GI, Hynan LS, Reisch J, Trivedi JR (2008) Denture cream: an unu- sual source of excess zinc, leading to hypocupremia and neuro-logic disease. Neurology 71(9):639?643
  19. Doherty K, Connor M, Cruickshank R (2011) Zinc-containing denture adhesive: a potential source of excess zinc resulting in copper deficiency myelopathy. Br Dent J 210(11):523?525
  20. Shay K (1997). The retention of complete dentures. In: Zarb GA, Bolender CL Carlsson GE Boucher?s prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients, 11th ed. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book, Inc., p 400?411
  21. Zhao K, Cheng XR, Chao YL, LI ZA, Han GL (2004) Laboratory evaluation of a new denture adhesive. Dent Mater 20:419?424
  22. Koksal Temel (2007). ??A survey of dentists? attitudes toward Denture Adhesives??. OHDMBSC-Vol. 1 Martie; 33?39.

Similar Articles