Vol. 5 (04) pp. 1096-1103 DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/3919

CLOSED HOLLOW BULB OBTURATOR WITH REPLICATED PALATAL RUGAE IN A HEMIMAXILLECTOMY PATIENT-A CLINICAL REPORT.

  • PG Scholar. Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge. JSS Dental College and Hospital. A constituent college of Jagadguru Sri Shivarathreeshwara University (JSS University), Mysuru-570015, Karnataka, India.
  • MDS, Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge. JSS Dental College and Hospital. A constituent college of Jagadguru Sri Shivarathreeshwara University (JSS University), Mysuru-570015, Karnataka, India.
20 Downloads 157 Views
Crossref

Abstract

Introduction: The most common intra oral defects are in the form of cleft or opening in the palate. These defects may be acquired or congenital. Acquired is due to injuries or surgical excision of tumor and congenital is due to malformation. One of the main impacts of patients submitted to maxillectomy is the impairment of speech intelligibility. Obturator is defined as prosthesis used to close congenital or acquired tissue opening, primarily of hard palate and contiguous alveolar structures. Ideally, this prosthesis should be easy to construct, be light in weight, provide better retention, support, and stability, and be functionally acceptable to the patient. To fabricate a lightweight prosthesis, a closed hollow obturator can be fabricated. There are many methods available to fabricate closed hollow bulb obturators. Objective: To fabricate a light weight hollow bulb obturator with duplicated palatal rugae for a hemimaxillectomy patient in a simple way. Case: A 32-year-old man visited the Department of Prosthodontics for the rehabilitation of a 1-year-old maxillary defect after hemimaxillectomy due to squamous cell carcinoma and was treated with hollow bulb obturator prosthesis with a duplicated palatal rugae. Conclusion: The hollow bulb reduces the weight of prosthesis and duplicated palatal rugae helps in improving speech intelligibility, making it comfortable for the patient.

Keywords

How to Cite This Article

Jay Mehta, Raghavendra Swamy.K.N, Dhakshaini M.R and Anil Kumar Gujjari. (2017); CLOSED HOLLOW BULB OBTURATOR WITH REPLICATED PALATAL RUGAE IN A HEMIMAXILLECTOMY PATIENT-A CLINICAL REPORT., International Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR), 5 (04), 1096-1103, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/3919

Corresponding Author

Dr. Jay Mehta
PG Scholar. Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge. JSS Dental College and Hospital. A constituent college of Jagadguru Sri Shivarathreeshwara University (JSS University), Mysuru-570015, Karnataka, India.

Article Analytics

References

  1. Allen LR (1958) Improved phonetics in denture construction. J Prosthet Dent 8:753?763.
  2. Manvi S, Ankola A. Simple Technique for Duplicating the Palatal Rugae in the Maxillary Complete Denture. World. 2012 Jan; 3(1):95-6.
  3. Mohamed A. Aramany. Basic principles of obturator design for partially edentulous patients. Part I: Classification. J Prosthet Dent 1978; 40: 554-557.
  4. Nidiffer TJ, Shipmon TH. The hollow bulb obturator for acquired palatal openings. J Prosthet Dent 1957; 7: 126-34.
  5. Plank DM, Weinberg B, Chalian VA. Evaluation of speech following prosthetic obturation of surgically acquired maxillary defects. J Prosthet Dent. 1981; 45(6):626-38.
  6. C. Deogade, S. S. Mantri,D.Naitam, G. Dube, P. Gupta, and A. Dewangan, ?A direct investment method of closed two-piece hollow bulb obturator,? Case Reports in Dentistry, vol. 2013, Article ID 326530, 6 pages, 2013.
  7. Tanaka Y, Gold HO, Pruzansky S. A simplified technique for fabricating a lightweight obturator. J Prosthet Dent. 1977; 38:638?642.
  8. D. Taylor, Clinical Maxillofacial Prosthetics, Quintessence Publishing, 2000.
  9. -L.Wu and N. G. Schaaf, ?Comparison of weight reduction in different designs of solid and hollow obturator prostheses,? The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 214?217, 1989.

Similar Articles