Vol. 5 (05) pp. 200-212 DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/4098

ASSESSMENT OF RADIOMORPHOMETRIC INDICES ON DIGITAL PANORAMIC AND CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC IMAGES IN OSTEOPOROTIC EGYPTIAN FEMALES.

  • Assistant Lecturer, Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
  • Associate Professor, Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
  • Professor, Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
31 Downloads 155 Views
Crossref

Abstract

Background and purpose: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of radiomorphometric indices based on digital panoramic and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images as osteoporosis predictors in healthy and osteoporotic women. Methods: Twenty selected female volunteers were scanned by digital panoramic, dual Energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and CBCT scans. According to the DEXA results, they were categorized into either normal or osteopenic/osteoporotic group. The same measurements were performed on digital panoramic, and CBCT images by 3 observers and the average of each was calculated. Results: This study demonstrated that there was no significant correlation between the DEXA results with either panoramic or CBCT indices in the normal, osteopenic and osteoporotic groups. Conclusion: Within the limitation of the current study regarding the limited sample size, the bone of the mandible does not appear to reflect the characteristics of the skeleton as a whole. Panoramic Mandibular Index and Mental Index, with a larger sample size, may serve as prognostic osteoporosis indices.

Keywords

How to Cite This Article

Sarah M. Kenawy, Dina M. El Beshlawy and Mushira M. Dahaba (2017); ASSESSMENT OF RADIOMORPHOMETRIC INDICES ON DIGITAL PANORAMIC AND CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC IMAGES IN OSTEOPOROTIC EGYPTIAN FEMALES., International Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR), 5 (05), 200-212, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/4098

Corresponding Author

sarah Mohammed Kenawy
Assistant Lecturer, Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

Article Analytics

References

  1. Benson BW, Prihoda TJ and Glass BJ (1991): Variations in adult cortical bone mass as measured by a panoramic mandibular index. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol., 71(3):617?21.
  2. Berco M, Rigali P H, Matthew Miner R, Deluca S, Andreson NK and Will LA (2009): Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull. Am J OrthodDentofacialOrthop., 136(1):17.e1-9.
  3. Bras J, Van Ooij CP, Abraham-Inpijn L, Kusen GJ and Wilmink JM (1982): Radiographic interpretation of the mandibular angular cortex: a diagnostic tool in metabolic bone loss. Part I. Normal state. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol., 53(5):541?5.
  4. ?akur B, Dağistan S and S?mb?ll? MA (2010): No correlation between mandibular and nonmandibular measurements in osteoporotic men. ActaRadiol., 51(7):789-792.
  5. ?akur B, Dağistan S, Harorli A and Ezmeci EB (2011): The mandibular angle in osteoporotic men. Med Oral Pathol Oral Cir Bucal., 1; 16(2):e181-4.
  6. ?akur B, Dagistan S, Sahin A, Harorli A and Yilmaz A (2009): Reliability of mandibular cortical index and mandibular bone mineral density in the detection of osteoporotic women. DentomaxillofacRadiol., 38(5):255-61.
  7. Damilakis J and Vlasiadis K (2011): Have panoramic indices the power to identify women with low BMD at the axial skeleton?.PhysicaMedica., 27(1): 39-43.
  8. Delaney MF (2006): Strategies for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis during early post menopause. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology., 194(2 suppl): S12?23.
  9. Devlin H and Horner K (2002): Mandibular radiomorphometric indices in the diagnosis of reduced skeletal bone mineral density. Osteopor Int., 13(5):373-8.
  10. Dutra V, Devlin H, Susin C, Yang J, Horner K and Fernandes AR (2006): Mandibular morphological changes in low bone mass edentulous females: evaluation of panoramic radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral RadiolEndod., 102(5):663-8.
  11. Dutra V, Yang J, Devlin H and SusinCh (2005): Radiomorphometric indices and their relation to gender, age, and dental status. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral RadiolEndod., 99(4):479-84.
  12. Gulsahi A, Paksoy CS, Ozden S, Kucuk NO, Cebeci AR and Genc Y (2010): Assessment of Bone Mineral Density in The Jaws and Its Relationship to radiomorphometric Indices. DentomaxillofacRadiol., 39(5):284-89.
  13. Hirai T, Ishijima T, Hashikawa Y and Yajima T (1993): Osteoporosis and reduction of residual ridge in edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent., 69(1): 49?56.
  14. Kazakia GJ and Majumdar S (2006): New imaging technologies in the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Rev EndocrMetabDisord., 7(1-2):67-74.
  15. Klemetti E and Vainio MS (1993): Effect of bone mineral density in skeleton and mandible on extraction of teeth and clinical alveolar height. J Prosthet Dent., 70(1): 21?25.
  16. Klemetti E, Kolmakov S and Kroger H (1994): Pantomography in assessment of the osteoporosis risk group. Scand J Dent Res., 102(1):68?72.
  17. Koh KJ and Kim KA (2011): Utility of the computed tomography indices on cone beam computed tomography images in the diagnosis of osteoporosis in women. Imaging Science in Dentistry., 41(3):101-6.
  18. Ledgerton D, Horner K Devlin H and Worthington H (1997): Panoramic mandibular index as a radiomorphometric tool an assessment of precision. DentomaxillofacRadiol., 26(2):95?100.
  19. Ledgerton D, Horner K, Devlin H and Worthington H (1999): Radiomerphometric indices of the mandible in a British female population. DentomaxillofacRadiol., 28(3):173-81.
  20. Leite AF, Figueiredo PT, Guia CM, Melo NS and de Paula AP (2010): Correlations between seven panoramic radiomorphometric indices and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral RadiolEndod., 109(3):449-456.
  21. Mahl CRW, Licks R and Fontanella VRC (2008): Comparison of morphometric indices obtained from dental panoramic radiography for identifying individuals with osteoporosis/osteopenia. Radiol Bras., 41(3):183?187.
  22. Marandi S, Bagherpour A, Imanimoghaddam M, Hatef MR and Haghighi AR (2010): Panoramic-Based Mandibular Indices and Bone Mineral Density of Femoral Neck and Lumbar Vertebrae in Women. J Dent (Tehran)., 7(2):98-106.
  23. Nakamoto T, Taguchi A, Ohtsuka M, Suei Y, Fujita M, Tanimoto K, Tsuda M, Sanada M, Ohama K, Takahashi J and Rohlin M (2003): Dental panoramic radiograph as a tool to detect postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density: untrained general dental practitioners? diagnostic performance. Osteoporos Int., 14(8): 659?664.
  24. Nakamura Y, Suzuki T, Kamimura M, Ikegami S, Uchiyama S and Kato H (2017): Alfacalcidol Increases the Therapeutic Efficacy of Ibandronate on Bone Mineral Density in Japanese Women with Primary Osteoporosis. Tohoku J Exp Med., 241(4):319-326.
  25. Scarfe WC, Farman AG and Sukovic P (2006): Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc., 72(1): 75-80.
  26. White SC (2002): Oral radiographic predictors of osteoporosis. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology., 31(2): 84-92.
  27. Xie QF and Ainamo A (2004): Correlation of gonial angle size with cortical thickness, height of the mandibular residual body, and duration of edentulism. J Prosthet Dent., 91(5):477-82.
  28. Yeap SS, Hew FL, Lee JK, Goh EML, Chee W, Mumtaz M, Damodaran P, Lim HH and Chan SP (2013): The Malaysian Clinical Guidance On The Management Of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis, 2012: A Summary. Int J Rheum Dis., 16(1):30-40.
  29. Zarch SH, Bagherpour A, Langaroodi AJ, Yazdi AA and Safaei A (2011): Evaluation of the Accuracy of Panoramic Radiography in Linear Measurements of the Jaws. Iran J Radiol., 8(2): 97-102.

Similar Articles