27May 2017

EFFICACY OF VARIOUS SCAR REVISION TECHNIQUES IN MAXILLOFACIAL REGION- A PROSPECTIVE DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY.

  • Kanpur, U.P, India.
  • Reader,Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery,Rama Dental College- Hospital & Research Centre, Kanpur,U.P, India.
  • Consultant Pathologist,Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Aim- Facial scars cause both psychological and aesthetical torment to the patient?s and have a distressing impact on their quality of life and self esteem. Scar revision surgeries require diligent caring and solely depends on surgeon?s perception of pleasant aesthetic features. As there is no ?cook book? approach to scar revision, it requires some talent and honing of skills. Here we present a research study on management of facial scars, through various revision techniques and compare their efficacy in restoring normal anatomy, with minimal complications. Methods- This study was undertaken in our tertiary care center, over a period of two years. 96 patients were selected with disfiguring scars caused mainly due to trauma, burns or other iatrogenic factors. Techniques of scar revision included Z plasty, W plasty and VY plasty. Results-The scar revision surgery yielded excellent results. Complications were encountered in 5% of cases, namely, haematoma formation, secondary infection and delayed healing. Regarding the efficacy of scar revision, excellent improvement was seen in 60% patients, moderate improvement was seen in 30% patients and mild improvement was seen in 10% patients. Conclusions: Various surgical scar revision techniques can be done to treat specific types of scars, based on their size and site. A thorough knowledge of skin physiology, biomechanics, facial aesthetic principles, and the surgical geometry of soft-tissue surgery is mandatory for the surgeon and can help in minimizing the scarring.


  1. Shockley WW. Scar revision techniques. Oper Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;22:84-93.
  2. Cupp CL, Johnson MB, Larrabee WF. Scar revision. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 1998;6:195-201.
  3. Davidson TM. Lacerations and Scar Revision. In: Cummings, ed., Otolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery. 3rd ed. Mosby-Year Book, 1998.
  4. Clark RA. Basics of cutaneous wound repair. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1993; 19(8):693?706.
  5. Moran ML. Scar revision. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2001; 34(4):767?780.
  6. Niessen FB, Spauwen PH, Schalkwijk J, Kon M. On the nature of hypertrophic scars and keloids: a review. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104(5):1435?1458.
  7. Sherris DA, Larrabee WF Jr, Murakami CS. Management of scar contractures, hypertrophic scars, and keloids. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1995; 28(5):1057?1068.
  8. Inalsingh CH. An experience in treating five hundred and one patients with keloids. Johns Hopkins Med J 1974; 134(5):284?290.
  9. Lindsey WH, Davis PT. Facial keloids. A 15-year experience. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 123(4):397?400.
  10. Blackburn WR, Cosman B. Histologic basis of keloid and hypertrophic scar differentiation. Clinicopat hologic correlation. Arch Pathol 1966; 82(1):65?71.
  11. Rohrich RJ, Zbar RI. A simplifi ed algorithm for the use of Z-plasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103:1513-7.
  12. Rodgers BJ, Williams EF, Hove CR. W-Plasty and geometric broken line closure. Facial Plast Surg. 2001;17:239-44.
  13. Borges AF. W-plasty. Ann Plast Surg. 1979;3:153-9.
  14. Park SS. Scar revision through W-plasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 1998;6:157-61.

[Tanya Sethi, Vijayendra Kumar, Shreya Gour and Devika Gupta (BDS). (2017); EFFICACY OF VARIOUS SCAR REVISION TECHNIQUES IN MAXILLOFACIAL REGION- A PROSPECTIVE DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 5 (May). 1297-1301] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


Dr Vijayendra Kumar
Rama Dental College- Hospital & Research Centre

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/4246      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/4246