OUTCOME OF UNSTABLE INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURE HIP TREATED WITHPROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL- A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF 50 CASES.
- M.S.(Orthopaedics), Specialist Medical Officer in Orthopaedics, Mumbai.
- M.S.(Orthopaedics),Clinical Associate In Orthopaedics, Mumbai.
7 Downloads
136 Views
Abstract
Background: Hip fracture in elderly patients is a very devastating complication of osteoporosis and has serious complications leading to serious threat to patient?s mobility & social life and sometimes causing death.
Aims &Objectives:To report outcome of 50 consecutive patients having unstable intertrochanteric fracture hip treated with a proximal femoral nail (PFN), a recently introduced cephalomedullary nail by AO.
Materials &Methods:Total 50 patients sustaining unstable intertrochanteric fractures due to any cause, as classified by AO underwent proximal femoral nailing with a lag screw, and an anti rotational hip Screw during the period of August 2013 to January 2016.The most common fracture type was A2.2 (n=25), followed by A2.3 (n=15) and A3.1 (n=3) and A3.3(n=7) The position of the tip of lag screw within the femoral head was measured from the center of the head in AP and lateral views, intra operatively, post operatively and in follow ups.. The lateral slide of the lag screw after fracture consolidation was measured by comparing the immediate postoperative and final anteroposterior radiographs.
Results:90% of lag screws were placed in an optimal position(i.e, inferiorly on AP view and centrally in lateral view) . The length of lateral slide leading to telescoping effect of the lag screw in A2.2 fractures was significantly less than that in A3.3 fractures which are highly communited suggesting that free sliding of the lag screw facilitates direct impaction between fragments.
Discussion: Compared to laterally placed slide plates, PFN decreases the bending forces upto 25-30% and in comparison with previous intramedullary devices e.g gamma nails, it showed significant less cutout rates due to an additional antirotational hip screw, with more suitable biomechanical properties.
Conclusion.A PFN is optimum implant for the treatment of unstable inter trochanteric fracture hip.
Keywords
How to Cite This Article
Ghaniuzzoha Asadi and Suyash Kothari. (2017); OUTCOME OF UNSTABLE INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURE HIP TREATED WITHPROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL- A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF 50 CASES., International Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR), 5 (05), 635-642, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/4157
Corresponding Author
Article Analytics
References
- Dimon JC, Hughston JC- Unstable intertrochanteric fracture of hip;J Bone Joint Surg Am.1967;49 A; 440-50.
- Jensen JS- Trochanteric Fracture,an epidemiological, Clinical and biomechanical study;ActaOrthop Scand,1981,suppl 188;1-100.
- Pu JS, Liu L, Wang GL, Fang Y, Yang TF. Results of the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) in elderly Chinese patients. Int Orthop.2009;33(5):1441-4, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0776-3.
- Parker MJ, Handoll HH. Gamma and other cephalocondylicintrame-dullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010(9):CD000093.
- Kokoroghiannis C, Aktselis I, Deligeorgis A, FragkomichalosE,Papadimas D, Pappadas I. Evolving concepts of stability and intrame-dullary fixation ofintertrochanteric fractures--a review. Injury. 2012;43(6):686-93, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.05.031.
- Sadowski C, Lubbeke A, Saudan M, Riand N, Stern R, HoffmeyerP.Treatment of reverse oblique and transverse intertrochanteric fractureswith use of an intramedullary nail or a 95 degrees screw-plate: aprospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84-A(3):372-81.
- Murray RC; Trochanteric fracture of femur;JBoneJoint Surg.1949,31B,478.
- Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM. Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures. ClinOrthopRelat Res 1998;348:87?94.
- Simmermacher RK, Bosch AM, Van der Werken C. The AO/ASIF-proximal femoral nail (PFN): a new device for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures.Injury 1999;30:327?32.20.
- Vidyadhara S, Rao SK. One and two femoral neck screws with intramedullary nails for unstable 1trochanteric fractures of femur in the elderly: randomised clinical trial. Injury 2007;38:806?14.21.
- Gadegone WM, Salphale YS. Proximal femoral nail:an analysis of 100 cases of proximal femoral fractures with an average follow up of 1 year Int. Orthopaedics 2007;31:403?8.
- Strauss EJ, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ, Egol KA. The ?Z-effect? phenomenon defined: a laboratory study J Orthop Res 2007;25:1568?73.
- Tyllianakis M, Panagopoulos A, Papadopoulos A, Papasimos S, Mousafiris .Treatment of extracapsular hip fractures with the proximal femoral nail (PFN): long term results in 45 patients. ActaOrthopBelg 2004;70:444?54.
- Simmermacher RK, Ljungqvist J, Bail H, Hockertz T, Vochteloo AJ, Ochs U, et al. The new proximal femoral nail antirotation(PFN-A) in daily practice: results of a multicentre clinical study. Injury 2008;39:932?9.
- Menezes DF, Gamulin A, Noesberger B. Is the proximal femoral nail a suitable implant for treatment of all trochanteric fractures? ClinOrthopRelat Res 2005;439:221?7.
- Boldin C, Seibert FJ, Fankhauser F, Peicha G, Grechenig W, Szyszkowitz R. The proximal femoral nail (PFN)?a minimal invasive treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a prospective study of 55 patients with a follow-up of 15 months.
- ActaOrthopScand 2003;74:53?8.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





