THE EFFECT OF LEADERSHIP, WORK MOTIVATION, WORK ENVIRONMENT TOWARD EMPLOYEES PERFORMANCE.
- Lecturer of Management of Postgraduate Program, University of Mercu Buana, Jakarta, Indonesia.
- Master of Management, University of Mercu Buana, Jakarta, Indonesia.
- Abstract
- Keywords
- References
- Cite This Article as
- Corresponding Author
According on the data secondary of PT XYZ in 2014 - 2016 average percentage employees\' performance was decreased around 7% and based on research studied pursed into three (3) the dominant factors that affect to employees\' performance (Y) is that leadership (X1), work motivation (X2) and work environment (X3). The purpose of this study is to answer about the influence of leadership, work motivation, work environment toward employees? performance. This population in this research is 100 with a total of 80 samples that are used PT XYZ employees. Data collection techniques are observation, interviews and questionnaire; the technique of data analysis used is multiple linear regressions using SPSS version 22 program. Results of hypothesis testing shows that the variables: 1) Leadership has positive and significant influence on employees? performance, 2) Work motivation has positive and significant influence on employees? performance, 3) Work environment has a positive and significant influence on employees? performance, 4). Leadership, work environment, work motivation simultaneously has a positive and significant influence on employees? performance. This study concluded that the employees? performance can be improved by enhancing the leadership, work motivation and work environment. This research could become a reference for PT XYZ to enhance the officials\' performances. The leaders at PT XYZ should be able to reflect the attitude of a leader and motivation on employee performance will effect positive if any availability of facilities and adequate working facilities and the creation of a working relationship between employees and leadership will help improve the performance of employees then it came to pass increase of employee performance at PT XYZ, Jakarta, Indonesia.
- Armstrong, M. (2012). Armstrong\'s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice, 12th Ed. London, Kogan, p.567.
- Atkinson, R. (1999),\"Project Management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon; it\'s time to accept other success criteria\", International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 17 No. 6, p.337.
- Bass, BM (1985), Leadership and Performance beyond Expectations, Free Press, New York, NY, p.49.
- Bass, BM and Avolio, BJ (1993),\"Transformational Leadership: a response to critiques\", in Chemers, MM and Ayman, A. (Eds), Leadership Theory and Research: Perspectives and Directions, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, p.49-80.
- Bugenhagen, MJ and Barbuto, JE Jr. (2012), \"Testing the developmental nature of work motivation using Kegan\'s constructive development theory\", Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, Vol. 19 No. 2, p. 267.
- Robbins, Stephen P. (2003). Organizational Behavior, Tenth Edition, Singapore: Prentice, p.704
- Chandrasekar, K. (2011). Workplace Environment and Its Impact on Organizational Performance in Public Sector Organizations. International Journal of Enterprise Computing and Business Systems (Online) Vol. 1 Issue 1 January 2011, p.95-109
- Deluga, RJ (1992), \"The relationship of leader-member exchange with laissez faire, transactional, transformational leadership in naval environments\", in Clark, KE, Clark, MB and Campbell, DP (Eds), Impact of Leadership, Center of Creative Leadership, Greensboro, NC, p.237-47.
- Dunggio and Rachman. (2017). Influence Of Leadership, Motivation And Work Environment On The Performance Of Employees: Internal Communications & Organizational Behavior Journal Vol. 8, No. 6: Mar 7, 2017, p. 8.
- Hackman, JR and Oldham, GR (1980), Work Redesign, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, PA. p.330.
- Hannagan, T. (1995). Management Concepts and Practices: Delhi, India McMillan Ltd. p.237-264.
- Liden, RC and Antonakis, J. (2009), \"Considering the context in psychological research leadership\", Human Relations, Vol. 62 No. 11, p.1587-1605.
- Linder, J.R (1998). Understanding Motivation Employees, Journal of Extension, p. 3.
- Maurer, T., Weiss, E. and Barbeite, F. (2003),\"A model of of involvement in work related learning and development activity: the effects of individual, situational, motivational, and agevariables\", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88 No. 4, p.707-724.
- Messah, OI, and Kamencu, SM (2011). The Effect of Performance Appraisal Systems on Employees in Kenya Tea Development Agency: A Survey of Selected Tea Factories in Meru County-Kenya, Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 2 (3), p.16-34.
- Roy, DD (2001). Work Motivation: Definition, Barriers and Strategies, Lecture Delivered to Senior Executives of Hindustan Copper Ltd, ChatShila, India, p.32.
- Sanvido, V., Grobler, F., Parfitt, K., Guvenis, M. and Coyle, M. (1992), \"Critical success factors for construction projects\", Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol. 118 No. 1, p.94-111.
- Stogdill, RM (1950), \"Leadership, membership and organization\", Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 47 No. 1, p.1-14.
- Tukel, O. and Rom, W. (2001), \"An empirical investigation of project evaluation criteria\", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 21 No. 3, p.400-13.
- Weick, KE (1979), The Social Psychology of Organizing, McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, NY, p.1-19
[Ignatius Jeffrey and Reisza Vallewey Dantes. (2017); THE EFFECT OF LEADERSHIP, WORK MOTIVATION, WORK ENVIRONMENT TOWARD EMPLOYEES PERFORMANCE. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 5 (Aug). 1450-1458] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com
Lecturer of Management of Post Graduate Program, University of Mercu Buana, Jakarta, Indonesia.
