25Oct 2017

ARTICAINE IN ENDODONTICS: A REVIEW.

Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author
  1. John M. Nusstein, DDS, MSa, Al Reader, DDS, MSb, Melissa Drum, DDS, MSc Local Anesthesia Strategies for the Patient With a ??Hot ?Tooth. Dent Clin N Am 54 (2010) 237?247
  2. Segura-Egea JJ, Cisneros-Cabello R, Llamas-Carreras JM, Velasco-Ortega E. Pain associated with root canal treatment. IntEndod J 2009;42:614?20.
  3. Fleury AA. Local anesthesia failure in endodontic therapy: the acute inflammation factor. Compendium 1990;11:210. 212, 214 passim.
  4. Quint JH. The failure of local anesthesia in acute inflammation. Br Dent J 1981;151:214.
  5. Wallace JA, Michanowicz AE, Mundell RD, Wilson EG. A pilot study of the clinical problem of regionally anesthetizing the pulp of an acutely inflamed mandibular molar. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1985;59:517?21
  6. Marc snoeck.articaine: a review of its use for local and regional anesthesia.dovepressjournel 25 june 2012
  7. Malamed S. Handbook of Local Anesthesia. 6th ed. St. Louis, MO: CV Mosby; 2013.
  8. Oertel R, Richter K, Weile K, Gramatt? T, Berndt A, Feller K. A simple method for the determination of articaine and its metabolite articainic acid in dentistry: Application to a comparison of articaine and lidocaine concentrations in alveolus blood. Methods Find ExpClinPharmacol 1993;15:541‑
  9. Sekhar GR, Nagaraju T, KolliGiri, Nandagopal V, Sudheer R, Sravan. Is palatal injection mandatory prior to extraction of permanent maxillary tooth: A preliminary study. Indian J Dent Res 2011;22:100‑
  10. Wang GK, Calderon J, Jaw SJ, Wang SY. State-dependent block of Na+ channels by articaine via the local anesthetic receptor. J Membr Biol. 2009;229:1?9.
  11. McLure HA, Rubin AP. Review of local anaesthetic agents. Minerva Anestesiol. 2005;71:59?74.
  12. Sack U, Kleemann PP. Intraoral conduction anesthesia with epinephrine-containing local anesthetics and arterial epinephrine plasma concentration. Anesth Pain Control Dent. 1992;1:77?80.
  13. Mather LE, Tucker GT. Properties, absorption, and disposition of local anesthetic agents. In: Cousins MJ, Carr DB, Horlocker TT, Bridenbaugh PO, editors. Neural BlockadeinClinical Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 4th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2009:48-95
  14. Vree TB, Gielen MJ. Clinical pharmacology and the use of articaine for local and regional anaesthesia. Best Pract Res ClinAnaesthesiol. 2005;19:293?308.
  15. Vree TB, Simon MA, Gielen MJM. Booij LHDJ. Regional metabolism of articaine in 10 patients undergoing intravenous regional anaesthesia during day case surgery. Br J ClinPharmacol. 1997;44:29?34.
  16. Grossmann M, Sattler G, Pistner H, et al. Pharmacokinetics of articaine hydrochloride in tumescent local anesthesia for liposuction. J ClinPharmacol. 2004;44:1282?1289.
  17. Calvo R, Carlos R, Erill S. Effects of disease and acetazolamide on procaine hydrolysis by red cell enzymes. ClinPharmacolTher. 1980;27:175.
  18. Gerner P, Strichartz GR. Sensory and motor complications of local anesthetics. MuscleNerve. 2008;37:421?425.
  19. Zaric D, Christiansen C, Pace NL, Punjasawadwong Y. Transient neurologic symptoms (TNS) following spinal anaesthesia with lido?caine versus other local anaesthetics. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;2:CD003006.
  20. Pogrel MA. Permanent nerve damage from inferior alveolar nerve blocks ? an update to include articaine. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2007;35:271?273.
  21. Werdehausen R, Fazeli S, Braun S, et al. Apoptosis induction by different local anaesthetics in a neuroblastoma cell line. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103:711?718.
  22. Denson DD, Bridenbaugh PO, Turner PA, Phero JC. Comparison of neural blockade and pharmacokinetics after subarachnoid lidocaine in the rhesus monkey. II: Effects of volume, osmolality, and baricity. AnesthAnalg. 1983;62:995?1001.
  23. Nakamura T, Popitz-Bergez F, Birknes J, Strichartz GR. The critical role of concentration for lidocaine block of peripheral nerve in vivo: studies of function and drug uptake in the rat. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:1189?1197.
  24. Mather LE, Copeland SE, Ladd LA.Acute toxicity of local anesthetics: underlying pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamicconcepts.RegAnesth Pain Med. 2005;30:553?56.
  25. Rosenberg PH, Veering BT, Urmey WF. Maximum recommended doses of local anesthetics: a multifactorial concept. RegAnesth Pain Med. 2004;29:564?575.
  26. Wolf JW, Butterworth JF. Local anesthetic systemic toxicity: update on mechanisms and treatment. CurrOpinAnesthesiol. 2011;24:561?566.
  27. Drasner K. Local anesthetic toxicity: optimal management to avoid neurotoxic injury and treat cardiac arrest. ASA Refresher Courses in Anesthesiology. 2011;39:33?40.
  28. Malamed SF, Gagnon S, Leblanc D. Articaine hydrochloride: a stu?dy of the safety of a new amide local anesthetic. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001;132:177-85.
  29. Haas DA, Lennon D. Local anesthetic use by dentists in Ontario. J Can Dent Assoc. 1995;61:297-304.
  30. Pogrel MA. Permanent Nerve Damage From Inferior Alveolar Nerve Blocks-An Update to Include Articaine. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2007;35:271-3.
  31. Robertson D, Nusstein J, Reader A, Beck M, McCartney M. The anesthetic efficacy of articaine in buccal infiltration of mandibular pos?terior teeth. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007;138:1104-12.
  32. Evans G, Nusstein J, Drum M, Reader A, Beck M. A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Comparison of Articaine and Lidocaine for Maxillary Infiltrations. J Endod. 2008;34:389-93.
  33. Haase A, Reader A, Nusstein J, Beck M, Drum M. Comparing anesthetic efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine as a supplemental buc?cal infiltration of the mandibular first molar after an inferior alveolar nerve block. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139:1228-35.
  34. Malamed SF, Gagnon S, Leblanc D. Articaine hydrochloride: a study of the safety of anew amide local anesthetic. J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132:177?85.
  35. Oertel R, Rahn R, Kirch W. Clinical pharmacokinetics of articaine. Clin Pharm 1997;33:417?25
  36. Parirokh M, V Abbott P. Various strategies for pain-free root canal treatment. Iran Endod J 2014;9:1?14
  37. Paxton K, Thome DE. Efficacy of articaine formulations: quantitative reviews. Dent Clin North Am 2010;54:643?53. 14.
  38. Tortamano IP, Siviero M, Lee S, et al. Onset and duration period of pulpal anesthesia of articaine and lidocaine in inferior alveolar nerve block. Braz Dent J 2013;24: 371?4
  39. Claffey E, Reader A, Nusstein J, et al. Anesthetic efficacy of articaine for inferior alveolar nerve blocks in patients with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod 2004;30:568?71. 16.
  40. Mikesell P, Nusstein J, Reader A, et al. A comparison of articaine and lidocaine for inferior alveolar nerve blocks. J Endod 2005;31:265?70. 17.
  41. Tortamano IP, Siviero M, Costa CG, et al. A comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of articaine and lidocaine in patients with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod 2009;35: 165?8.
  42. Ashraf H, Kazem M, Dianat O, Noghrehkar F. Efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine in block and infiltration anesthesia administered in teeth with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. J Endod 2013;39:6?10. 19.
  43. Monteiro MR, Groppo FC, Haiter-Neto F, et al. 4% articainebuccal infiltration versus 2% lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block for emergency root canal treatment in mandibular molars with irreversible pulpits: a randomized clinical study. IntEndod J 2015;48:145?52.
  44. Rahul G, Nandlal B, Prashanth. Pain perception and procedural tolerance with computer controlled and conventional local anesthetic technique: An in vivo comparative study. Indian J Pain 2014;28:143‑
  45. Tortamano IP, Siviero M, Lee S, Sampaio RM, Simone JL,Rocha RG. Onset and duration period of pulpal anesthesia of articaine and lidocaine in inferior alveolar nerve block. Braz Dent J 2013;24:371‑
  46. Kolli NK, Nirmala SV, Nuvvula S. The Effectiveness of Articaine and Lidocaine Single Buccal Infiltration versus Conventional Buccal and Palatal Injection Using Lidocaine during Primary Maxillary Molar Extraction: A Randomized Control Trial. Anesth Essays Res 2017;11:160‑
  47. Adewumi A, Hall M, Guelmann M, Riley J. The incidence of adverse reactions following 4% septocaine (articaine) in children.Pediatr Dent 2008;30:424‑
  48. . Oztas N, Ulusu T, Bodur H, Dogan C. The wand in pulp therapy: An alternative to inferior alveolar nerve block. Quintessence Int 2005;36:559‑
  49. Song fan,wei-liangchen et al .anesthetic efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve block plus buccal infiltration or periodontal ligament injection with articaine in patient with irreversible pulpities in mandibular first molar. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral RadiolEndod 2009;108:e89-e93)
  50. Melissa Drum, DDS, MS; Al Reader, DDS, MS; John Nusstein, DDS, MS; Sara Fowler, DMD, MS Successful pulpal anesthesia for symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. 8 JADA 148(4) April 2017
  51. Arrow P. A comparison of articaine 4% and lignocaine 2% in block and infiltration analgesia in children. Aust Dent J. 2012;57(3):325-33.
  52. Parirokh M, V Abbott P. Various strategies for pain-free root canal treatment. Iran Endod J 2014;9:1?14.
  53. Vreeland DL, Reader A, Beck M, et al. An evaluation of volumes and concentrations of lidocaine in human inferior alveolar nerve block. J Endod 1989;15: 6?12. 21. Nusstein J, Reader A, Beck FM.
  54. Anesthetic efficacy of different volumes of lidocaine with epinephrine for inferior alveolar nerve blocks. Gen Dent 2002;50:372?5. 22.
  55. Parirokh M, Satvati SA, Sharifi R, et al. Efficacy of combining a buccal infiltration with an inferior alveolar nerve block for mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral RadiolEndod 2010;109: 468?73. 23.
  56. Wali M, Drum M, Reader A, Nusstein J. Prospective, randomized single-blind study of the anesthetic efficacy of 1.8 and 3.6 milliliters of 2% lidocaine with 1:50,000 epinephrine for inferior alveolar nerve block. J Endod 2010;36:1459?62. 24.
  57. Aggarwal V, Singla M, Miglani S, et al. Comparative evaluation of 1.8 mL and 3.6 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine for inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective, randomized single-blind study. J Endod 2012;38:753?6.
  58. Fowler S, Reader A. Is a volume of 3.6 mL better than 1.8 mL for inferior alveolar nerve blocks in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis? J Endod 2013;39: 970?2
  59. Li C, Yang X, Ma X, Li L, Shi Z. Preoperative oral nonsteroida.l anti-inflammatory drugs for the success of the inferior alveolar nerve block in irreversible pulpitis treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials. Quintessence Int 2012; 43: 209?19.
  60. Malamed SF. Handbook of local anesthesia. 6th ed. SaintcLouis, MO: Mosby; 2012.
  61. Brandt RG, Anderson PF, McDonald NJ, Sohn W, Peters MC. The pulpal anesthetic efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2011; 142: 493?504.
  62. Bigby J, Reader A, Nusstein J, et al. Articaine for supplemental intraosseous anesthesia in patients with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod 2006;32:1044?7.
  63. Hargreaves KM, Keiser K. Local anesthetic failure in endodontics: mechanisms and management. Endod Topics 2002;1:26?39.
  64. McLean ME, Wayman BE, Mayhew RB. Duration of anesthesia using the periodontal ligament injection: a comparison of bupivacaine to lidocaine. Anesth Pain Control Dent 1992;1:207?13.
  65. Haas DA, Harper DG, Saso MA, et al. Lack of differential effect by Ultracaine (articaine) and Citanest (prilocaine) in infiltration anaesthesia. J Can Dent Assoc 1991;57:217?23.
  66. Haas DA, Harper DG, Saso MA, et al. Comparison of articaine and prilocaine anesthesia by infiltration in maxillary and mandibular arches. AnesthProg 1990;37: 230?7.
  67. Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Corbett IP, et al. Articaine and lidocaine mandibular buccal infiltration anesthesia: a prospective randomized double-blind cross-over study. J Endod 2006;32:296?8.
  68. Robertson D, Nusstein J, Reader A, et al. The anesthetic efficacy of articaine in buccal infiltration of mandibular posterior teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138:1104?12.
  69. Corbett IP, Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, et al. Articaine infiltration for anesthesia of mandibular first molars. J Endod 2008;34:514?8.
  70. ung YIL, Kim JH, Kim SE, et al. An evaluation of buccal infiltrations and inferior alveolar nerve blocks in pulpal anesthesia for mandibular first molars. J Endod 2008;34:11?3.
  71. Meechan JG, Kanaa MD, Corbett IP, et al. Pulpal anaesthesia for mandibular permanent first molar teeth: a double-blind randomized cross-over trial comparing buccal and buccal plus lingual infiltration injections in volunteers. IntEndod J 2006;39: 764?9.
  72. Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Meechan JG. A comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine in achieving pulpal anesthesia in maxillary teeth with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod 2012;38:279?82.
  73. McEntire M, Nusstein J, Drum M, et al. Anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine versus 4% articaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine as a primary buccal infiltration in the mandibular first molar. J Endod 2011;37: 450?4.
  74. Poorni S, Veniashok B, Senthilkumar AD, et al. Anesthetic efficacy of four percent articaine for pulpal anesthesia by using inferior alveolar nerve block and buccal infiltration techniques in patients with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial. J Endod 2011;37:1603?7.
  75. Matthews R, Drum M, Reader A, et al. Articaine for supplemental buccal mandibular infiltration anesthesia in patients with irreversible pulpitis when the inferior alveolar nerve block fails. J Endod 2009;35:343?6.
  76. Aggarwal V, Jain A, Kabi D. Anesthetic efficacy of supplemental buccal and lingual infiltrations of articaine and lidocaine after an inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod 2009;35:925?9.

[Dhiyouf Ali, Aravind R Kudva and Harish k. shetty. (2017); ARTICAINE IN ENDODONTICS: A REVIEW. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 5 (Oct). 1625-1633] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Dhiyouf ali
Pg student yenepoya gental college derlakattae manglore 575018

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/5680      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/5680

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 25 | No. of Views: 122