Vol. 5 (10) pp. 1634-1643 DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/5681

COMMEMORATION OF THE GENOCIDE PERPETRATED AGAINST TUTSI IN RWANDA AT LOCAL LEVEL: POLICY ANALYSIS-PRACTICES-CHALLENGES-COMPETENCES AND PERSPECTIVES.

  • University of Kibungo (UNIK).
11 Downloads 97 Views
Crossref

Abstract

One of the good strategies to fight against human tragedies is to build strong memory around what happened with an aim of keeping historical facts on one side and educating current and future generations on the other hand. The genocide perpetrated against Tutsi in Rwanda in 1994 aligns with that framework and its commemoration has been at the center of efforts and political programs by the government of Rwanda. In fact, over the last twenty three years, the genocide has been publicly and officially commemorated inside and outside the country, with a neat improvement in its planning, execution and evaluation. Since 2013, commemorative activities are decentralized from national level to grass root level, in order to allow great and efficient involvement of different categories of Rwanda and hence, contribute to the reconstruction of shared history and memory around that genocide. This paper intended to explain how that decentralization is being implemented at local level, with an emphasis put specifically on policy analysis, practices, challenges, competences and perspectives. Interviews with key people as well as a thorough documentary analysis helped to gather and analyze data on what is really done and how to improve commemorative activities in future.

Keywords

Article Analytics

References

  1. BRYMAN, A., (2001). Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. FISCHER, R., et alii. (2007). Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics and Methods. CRC Press
  3. HALLBWACKS,M.,(1968).Collectivememory. Paris: PUF From http://popups.ulg.ac.be/csp/document.php?id=568#tocfrom2
  4. Institute of Research and Dialogue for Peace (IRDP). 2006). Rwanda Tutsi Genocide: Causes, Implementation and Memory: Kigali
  5. KIMONYO, J.P., (2008), Rwanda. Un g?nocide populaire, Paris?: Karthala
  6. La m?moire collective selon Maurice Halbwachs From :http://laurent.mucchielli.free.fr/memoire.htm
  7. LAVABRE, M.C., (s.d.) Usages et m?susages de la notion de m?moire [Online]
  8. MICHAEL SCHUSTER II ?for the greater good: the use of public policy considerations ? Houston Law Review, Vol. 46,2009
  9. MISAGO, C. ? Les instruments de la m?moire ?, Gradhiva from: http://gradhiva.revues.org/745
  10. NDUSHABANDI, E., (2013). La politique de la m?moire au Rwanda apr?s le g?nocide de 1994 : ?tude du dispositif des ? Ingando ?, Th?se de doctorat, Bruxelles
  11. ----------------------------. La gestion politique de la m?moire du g?nocide au Rwanda: M?moire officielle face aux repr?sentations sociales, in Cahier n?21 [Online]
  12. NKUSI L., (2010). Le G?nocide perp?tr? contre les Tutsi : Conservation de la m?moire et de la documentation, un d?fi possible ? relever in Actes du Colloque, CNLG: Kigali
  13. NORA, P., (s.d.) Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Memoire in Representations. The Regents of the University of California. [Online]
  14. RESOUX, V., ?La gestion du pass? au Rwanda : ambivalence et poids du silence? in Gen?ses, 2005/4 N0 61, p.28-46 From: http://www.cairn.info/revue-geneses-2005-4-page-28.htm
  15. RUDACOGORA, A., (s.d.). M?moire des sites et sites de m?moire au Rwanda apr?s 1994. Universit? Nationale du Rwanda- Universit? Paris 13[Online].
  16. RUTAYISIRE, P., (2003), Memoire et/ou oubli comme ran?on ? la paix civile [Online]
  17. THORSTEN, K., (2009). Confronting memories?memory, politics and law Europeanization as a challenge to legal history, s.l. (Online)

How to Cite This Article

BIMENYIMANA Valens. (2017); COMMEMORATION OF THE GENOCIDE PERPETRATED AGAINST TUTSI IN RWANDA AT LOCAL LEVEL: POLICY ANALYSIS-PRACTICES-CHALLENGES-COMPETENCES AND PERSPECTIVES., Int. J. of Adv. Res., 5 (10), 1634-1643, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/5681

Corresponding Author

BIMENYIMANA Valens
University of Kibungo (UNIK)