Vol. 5 (11) pp. 173-176 DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/5751

SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS OF DENTAL IMPLANTS.

, and
  • Post Graduate Student,Dept Of Periodontics, CoorgInstitut Of Dental Sciences, Virajpet, Karnataka.
  • HOD And Professor,Dept Of Periodontics, CoorgInstitut Of Dental Sciences, Virajpet, Karnataka.
  • Post Graduate Student DeptOf Periodontics, CoorgInstitut Of Dental Sciences, Virajpet, Karnataka.
16 Downloads 149 Views
Crossref

Download Full Paper (PDF)

Abstract

Over the past decade, several techniques to modify the implant surfaces have been widely studied and developed in an attempt to increase the rate of bone healing and to achieve rapid osteointegration. An appropriately modified titanium surface might certainly by the key factor for achieving a fast and stable implant outcome through optimal osteointegration.The implant-to-bone interface should be able to promote the apposition of new bone by a proper triggering of the biochemical functions. In a similar way, the surface of the implant area in contact with the gingival tissues should enhance the apposition of soft tissues, sealing the way to the ingress, proliferation, and colonization of bacteria from the oral cavity. Besides implant design and surgical technique, surface chemical composition and topography are recognized to be key factors for achieving a fast and durable osteointegration, as well as for implant stability over time.

Article Analytics

References

  1. Branemark PI, A.R., Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A. ,Intraosseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Ex-perimental studies. Scand J PlastReconstrSurg, 1969. 3: p. 81 ?1002. Christenson EM, A.K., van den Beucken LJ J Orthop Res, Nano-biomaterial applications in orthopedics. 25: p. 11?22.
  2. Palmquist, A., et al., Titanium oral implants: surface characteristics, interface biology and clinical outcome. J R Soc Interface, 2010. 7 Suppl 5: p. S515-27.
  3. Lavenus, S., G. Louarn, and P. Layrolle, Nanotechnology and dental implants. Int J Biomater, 2010. 2010: p. 915327
  4. Anselme, K., et al., The relative influence of the topography and chemistry of TiAl6V4 surfaces on osteoblastic cell behaviour. Biomaterials, 2000. 21(15): p. 1567-77. 71
  5. AlfarrajAldosari, A., et al., The Influence of implant geometry and surface composition on bone response. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2013.
  6. S, et al., Dental implant surface enhancement and osseointegration. Implant dentistry - a rapidly envolv, 2011.
  7. Wennerberg, A. and T. Albrektsson, Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2009. 20 Suppl 4: p. 172-84.
  8. Sul, Y.T., et al., Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness, and crystal structure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2005. 20(3): p. 349-59.
  9. Buser, D., et al., Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res, 2004. 83(7): p. 529-33.
  10. Thomsson M,?Esposito M, A retrospective case series evaluating BranemarkBioHelix implants placed in a specialist private practice following conventional procedures. One-year results after placement. Eur J Oral Implantol.2008 Autumn;1(3):229-34.
  11. Cao Larry et al., Bioactive materials.Ceramics International,1996, 22(6):P. 493-507.

How to Cite This Article

Haritha. T.V, Dr. B.S. Jagadish Pai and Dr.Nithya R Krishnan. (2017); SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS OF DENTAL IMPLANTS., Int. J. of Adv. Res., 5 (11), 173-176, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/5751

Corresponding Author

Dr.HARITHA T V
3rd Year Post Graduate Student
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.