14Dec 2017

DIVERSION AS A METHOD OF DISPUTE SETTLEMENT FOR THE OFFENCE OF ROAD TRAFIC TRANSPORTATION ACCIDENT(THE DIGNIFIED JUSTICEPERSPECTIVE).

  • Doctorate Candidate at the Faculty of Law University of 17 August 1945 (Untag) Surabaya.
  • Commissioner for the Republic of Indonesia Ethical Board of the Indonesian General Election Organizers (DKPP-RI) & Professor in Law, Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana Salatiga.
  • Dean of the Faculty of Law Universitas 17 Augustus 1945 (Untag) Surabaya.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

The perspective or the theory of dignified justice is a result of a contemplation and philosophical thinking, and scientific research about the world, especially in this case the legal world in general. It can therefore be considered as a grand theory of law. The Dignified justice theory understands, defines and justify or possibly falsify the idea of justice more broadly, encompassing a legal system and not merely defining the concept of justice as distributive, commutative, fairness or any other kind of justice. From the perspective of dignified justice theory, the researchers has found and believe that in the criminal pre-investigation phase of the Pancasila Legal System its laws and regulations which manifesting the spirit of the Indonesian people (Volksgeist) appears to imply possibilities of using diversion method to settle lawfully the violation of the legal provisions governing road traffic transportation which resulting in any road traffic accidents as an alternative way of obtaining justice based consensus and recognised by the court and the legal system. This is in line with the spirit in diversion known and existing in the Pancasila Legal System. Diversion, or penal mediation or whatever the name might be given to the alternative dispute or cases settlement, as long as it is in accordance with the legal principle of consensus deliberation (musyawarah mufakat), it is justified in the Pancasila Legal System, provided that it is not contrary to applicable laws and regulations in the System. In the Pancasila Legal System, particularly its criminal justice system (CJS) the investigator, public procecutors and judges may use their discretionary power as the law to utilised the diversion to settle cases or disputes arising from the violation of the road trafic transportation laws and regulations which cause road trafic transport accidents.

  1. Teguh Prasetyo,? Keadilan? Bermartabat? Prespektif? Teori? Hukum, Cetakan? Pertama,? Nusa Media, Bandung, 2015.
  2. Teguh Prasetyo dan Abdul Halim Barkatullah, Ilmu Hukum dan Filsafat Hukum: Studi Pemikiran Sepanjang Zaman, Cetakan Keempat, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta, 2011.
  3. __________, Filsafat, Teori, & Ilmu Hukum, Pemikiran Menuju Masyarakat yang Berkeadilan dan Bermartabat, Cetakan ke-1, RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2012.
  4. Teguh Prasetyo, Hukum Pidana, Edisi Revisi, Cetakan Keempat, RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2013.
  5. __________, Hukum dan Sistem Hukum Berdasarkan Pancasila, Cetakan Pertama, Media Perkasa, 2013.
  6. __________, Kriminalisasi dalam Hukum Pidana, Cetakan Ketiga, Nusa Media, Bandung, 2013.
  7. __________, Teori Keadilan Bermartbat: Perspektif Teori Hukum, Cetakan Pertama, Nusa Media, Bandung, 2015.
  8. __________, Sistem Hukum Pancasila: Sistem, Sistem Hukum dan Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia, Perspektif Teori Keadilan Bermartabat, Cetakan Pertama, Nusa Media, Bandung, 2016.
  9. Otto Yudianto, Formulative Policy of Life Imprisonment for Indonesia Penal Law Reform, Brilliant, Menuju Insan Cemerlang, Catakan Pertama, Surabaya, 2015.
  10. Endang Prasetyowati, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Cetakan Pertama, Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya, Surabaya, 2010.
  11. Nandang Sambas,?Updates Punishment System Children In Indonesia,?Graha Science, Yogyakarta, 2010.
  12. Marlina,?Introduction to the Concept of?Diversion?and?Restroactive?Justice In Criminal Law,?USU Press,?Cetakan Pertama,2010.

[Rendra Kurniawan Prasetya, Teguh Prasetyo, SH. M. Si and H. Slamet Suhartono, SH, MH. (2017); DIVERSION AS A METHOD OF DISPUTE SETTLEMENT FOR THE OFFENCE OF ROAD TRAFIC TRANSPORTATION ACCIDENT(THE DIGNIFIED JUSTICEPERSPECTIVE). Int. J. of Adv. Res. 5 (Dec). 565-575] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Rendra Kurniawan Prasetya
Doctorate Candidate at the Faculty of Law University

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/5994      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/5994

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 2 | No. of Views: 123