18Jan 2018

TO COMPARE TNO VERSUS RANDOT TEST FOR MEASURING STEREOACUITY WHILE SCREENING AIRLINE PILOTS.

  • AFCME, New Delhi.
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Background: Stereoacuity or depth perception is an important visual parameter which is often not tested during ophthalmic examinations but assumes enormous importance when dealing with critical occupations like flying. The importance of stereoacuity testing in pilots is recently been acknowledged however no official norms exist for universal testing of stereoacuity levels in pilots. We proposed to evaluate TNO with Randot stereacuity test in all airline pilots during their routine medical examination. Methods: A total of 515 airline pilots( 431 males and 84 females) with no previous ocular medical or surgical history were prospectively assessed using TNO and Random dot stereoacuity tests. Result: TNO and RDT correlated positively and significantly at .01 level. There was no statistically significant difference found between males and females. Conclusion: Both TNO and Randot stereoacuity compared favourably in testing stereoacuity testing and can be used universally however TNO test did show an added advantage of rechecking the colour perception of airline pilots as those with colour blindness cannot discriminate TNO test.


  1. von-Noorden GK, Campos E. Binocular vision and space perception. In: Binocular Vision and Ocular Motility. St Louis, Mosby Inc, 6th edition, p7-38, 2002
  2. Simons K. A comparison of the Frisby, Random-Dot E, TNO, and Randot circles stereotests in screening and office use. Arch Ophthalmol 99 (3):446-52, 1981
  3. Ohlsson J, Villareal G, Abrahamsson M, Cavazos H, Sj?str?m A, Sj?strand J. Screening merits of the Lang II, Frisby, Randot, Titmus, and TNO stereo tests. J AAPOS 5(5):316-322, 2001
  4. von-Noorden GK, Campos CE. Examination of the patient-V. In: Binocular vision and ocular motility. St Louis; Mosby Inc, 6th edition, 300, 2002
  5. Fawcett,SL, Birch, E.E.,Validity of the Titmus and randot circles tasks in children with known binocular vision disorders. J AAPOS 7(5):333-338, 2003
  6. Larson WL. Effect of TNO red-green glasses on local stereoacuity. Am J Optom& Physiol Optics 65 (12) 946-950, 1988
  7. Fricke T, Siderov J. Non-stereoscopic cues in the Random-Dot E stereotests: results for adult observers. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 17:122-7,1997
  8. Antona B,?Barrio A,?Sanchez I,?Gonzalez E&?Gonzalez G.?Intraexaminer repeatability and agreement in stereoacuity measurements made in young adults.?Int J Ophthalmol?2015;?8:?374?381.
  9. Simons K.?A comparison of the Frisby, Random-Dot E, TNO, and Randot circles stereotests in screening and office use.?Arch Ophthalmol1981;?99:?446?452.
  10. Fawcett SL&?Birch EE.?Validity of the Titmus and Randot circles tasks in children with known binocular vision disorders.?J AAPOS?2003;?7:?333?338.
  11. Leat SJ,?Pierre JS,?Hassan-Abadi S&?Faubert J.?The moving Dynamic Random Dot Stereosize test: development, age norms, and comparison with the Frisby, Randot, and Stereo Smile tests.?J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus?2001;?38:?284?294.

[Wg Cdr Sapna Raina and Col Anirudh Singh. (2018); TO COMPARE TNO VERSUS RANDOT TEST FOR MEASURING STEREOACUITY WHILE SCREENING AIRLINE PILOTS. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 6 (Jan). 846-849] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


WG CDR SAPNA RAINA, COL ANIRUDH SINGH
AFCME, DELHI

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/6292      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/6292