18Feb 2018

TRACING STOMATAL ONTOGENY THOUGH FOLIAR HISTOCHEMICAL STUDY IN ACANTHACEAE.

  • Department of Botany, Union Christian College, Aluva. Affiliated to Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

The stomatal complex of Acanthaceae, is analysed correlating the evidences from ontogeny and histochemistry. In mature stomatal complex, the mesogenous subsidiary cells bracket the guard cells in a ?C? shaped manner. Due to the unusual curvature of the subsidiary cells, the epidermal cells adjacent to the stomatal complex also acquire a ?C? shape irrespective of their ontogeny which, are perigenous in origin how ever resemble mesogenous subsidiary cells morphologically. From ontogenetic point of view these cells may be referred to as perigenous encircling cells. The functional association of mesogenous subsidiary cells to guard cells is indicated by epidermal histochemisty. When tested with Mercuric Bromophenol Blue (MBB) for total proteins, the guard cells of Strobilanthes ciliatus showed deep blue colour while the subsidiary cells were clearly differentiated by the dark shade of the peripheral region due to metachromatic reddish hue with MBB. Staining reaction with Toluidine Blue `O? indicated the presence of phenolic compounds with blue-green coloration in the diallelomesogenous complex of Justicia gendarussa. In Strobilanthes barbatus when tested for total lipids with Sudan III or IV, both guard cells and subsidiary cells were characterised by single large reddish orange lipid globules. These were absent in other epidermal cells and perigenous encircling cells. When subjected to PAS reaction, the mesogenous subsidiary cells of Peuderanthemum malabaricum gave less PAS positive results than both guard cells and epidermal cells. Epidermal histochemistry clearly distinguishes mesogenous stomatal complex from the morphologically similar perigenous cells and ordinary epidermal cells. The mesogenous subsidiary cells differ functionally from the morphologically similar perigenous encircling cells. These cells should be considered different from the diallelomesogenous? group of subsidiary cells characteristic of Acanthaceae. It is inferred that allelocytic stoma is mesogenous in origin and the terms mesoperigenous and diallelomesogenous are not applicable to acanthaceous stomata.


  1. Ahmad, K.J. 1974. Cuticular studies in some species of Hemigraphis and Porch. Indian Acad. Sci. LXXIX B: 21-40.
  2. Ahmad, K.J. 1979. Stomatal features of Acanthaceae. In ?Structure and function of stomata? 43-60.? Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh.? Dehra Dun.
  3. Baranova, 1992. Principles of comparative stomatographic studies Rev. 58(1): 49-97.
  4. Benecke, W. 1892. Die Nebenzellen der Spaltoffungen.?? Bot Zet. 50: 521-607.
  5. Bhogaonkar, P.Y. & S.K. Lande 2015. Anatomical characterization of Lepidagathis cristata Willd.- A Ethanomedicinal herb. Journal of global biosciences 4(5):2282-2288.
  6. Esau, K. 1965. Plant Anatomy, New York.
  7. Choopan, T. and Paul J. Grote 2015. Cystoliths in the leaves of the genus Pseuderanthemum (Acanthaceae) in Thailand. International Journal of Science 12(2) : 13 ? 20.
  8. Feder, N. and Wolf, M.K. 1965. Studies on the nucleic acid metachromacy II.. Metachromatic and Orthochromatic stalinilng by Tolulidine Blue of nucleic acid in tissue sections. J. Cell Biol. 27:? 327-336.
  9. Florin, R. 1931. Untersuchungen zzur Stammesgeschichte der Coniferiles und Cordaitales. K.Svensk. Vetenskaps. Handl.? III . 10 (1):1-588.
  10. Florin, R. 1933 Studien uber die Cycadales des Mesozoikums? Erorterung uber die
  11. Spaltoffnungsapparate ver Bennettitales. Svensk. Vetenskaps. Handl. III . 12(5): 1-134.
  12. Fryns -Claessens -Claessens, E and Van Cotthem, W. 1973. A new classification of the ontogenic type of stomata.? Rec. 39:? 71:138.
  13. Galatis, B. 1977 Differentiation of Stomatal meristamides and guard mother cell in Vigna sinensis leaves after colchicine treatment Planta 136: 103-114.
  14. Gomori, G. 1952. Microscopic Histochemistry, Principles and Practice.? of Chicago press,? Chicago Illinois.
  15. Guyot, M. 1971. Phylogenetic and systematic value of stomata of Umbellilferae.
  16. Linn. Soc. (Suppl. I), 64: 199-214.
  17. Haberlandt, G. 1914 Physiological plant anatomy. Mac Millan & Co. London.
  18. Hossain, A.B.M.E. 1974. Studies in ?Acanthaceae tribe Nelsonieae II, Foliar Sclereids and stomata.?? Notes R.B.G.? ? 33:? 269-274.
  19. Inamdar, J.A. ? Epidermal structure and ontogeny of caryophyllaceous stomata in some ?Acanthaceae.? Bot. Gaz. 131 (4) : 261-268.
  20. Inamdar, J. A. Bhatt, D.C. and Chaudhary, G.S. 1983.? Structure and development of stomata in some ?Acanthaceae.? Indian Acad, Sci.? (Plant Sci.) 92 (3) : 285-296.
  21. Jani, S. and H.C. Rudrappa 2014. Morphological, structural and micrometric study of cystolith of family Acanthaeceae W.S.R. to Kalmegh. International Journal of Green Pharmacy .
  22. J.A., Mohan, J.J.S. and Bhagavathi Subramanian. 1986. Stomatal classifications ? a review. Feddes Repert.? 97, 3-4:? 147-160.
  23. Jensen, W.A. ? Botanical Histochemistry. Free man, Sanfrancisco.
  24. Kannabiran, B. ? Foliar epidermis and ontogeny of stomata in Ecbolium linneanum,? Kurz. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci, 86B: 381-384.
  25. Kannabiran, B. and Krishnamurthy, K. 1979. Stomatal ontogeny in some Dicotyledonous families with special reference to its taxonomic and phylogenetic value.? In ?Structure and function of stomata? 23-41.Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh. Dehra Dun.
  26. Kearns, E.V. and Assmann, S. M. 1993.??? Guard cell-Environment connection.?? Plant Physiol. 102 :711-715.
  27. Krishnamurthy, K.V. 1988. Methods in Plant Histochemistry.? Viswanathan, Madras.
  28. Kumar, S. and Paliwal, G.S. 1975. Foliar anatomy of the family Acanthaceae The tribes Thunbergieae and Nelsonieae.? Acta. Bot. Indica 3:? 121-131.
  29. Kumar R.S., Reddy R.P., Rao S.G.& K. Nethaji Botanical Pharmacognosy on the Leaves of Medicinally Important Plant Andrographis paniculata (nees) Collected from the Forest Area of Medak District, Andhra Pradesh, India. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res., 25(2):292-295.
  30. Mazia, D., Brewer, P.A. and Alfert, M. ? Cytological staining measurement of protein with Mercuric Bromophenol blue.? Biol. Bull.? 104: 57-67.
  31. Meidner H and? Mansfield T A 1968 Physiology of Stomata. McGraw-Hill, London and Newyork.
  32. Metcalfe, R. and Chalk,? L.? 1950.? Anatomy of Dicotyledons.? 1950. Clarendon press, Oxford.
  33. Cully, M.E. 1966. Histological studies on the genus Ficus.? I Light microscopy of the mature vegetative plant.? Protoplasma: 62:? 287-305.
  34. Noor-syaheera M.Y., Noraini T., Radhiah A.K. & C. A. C. Che-nurul-Aini 2015. Leaf anatomical characteristics of Avicennia L.and some selected taxa in Acanthaceae. Malayan Nature Journal 67(1): 81-94.
  35. Paliwal, G.S. 1966. Structure and ontogeny of stomata in some Acanthaceae. Phytomorphology 16 (4):? 527-532.
  36. Pant, D. D. ? On the ontogeny of stomata and other homologous structures.? Plant Sci. Ser.? (Allahabad). 1: 1-24.
  37. Pant, D.D. and Mehra, B. Development of caryophyllaceous stomata in Asteracantha longifolia Nees.? Ann Bot.? 27: 647-652.
  38. Patel, J. D. ? How should we interpret and distinguish subsidiary cells ? Bot. J. Linn. Soc.? 77:? 65-72.
  39. Patil A.M. & D.A Patil 2011. Occurrence and significance of cystoliths in Acanthaceae. J. Curr. Bot. 2(4): 01-05.
  40. Payne, W.W. Helicocytic and allelocytic stomata: Unrecognised patterns in the
  41. Amer. J. Bot. 57 (2) : 140-147.
  42. Pearse A. G. E. 1985. Histochemistry, theoretical and applied Vols. I & II Chruchill, London.
  43. Praksh, G. and Kumar, V. ? Stomatal study on defence organs by conservation facsimile method.? J. Indian Bot. Soc.74: 263-268.
  44. Raju, E.C. and Shah, J.J. 1975. Studies in Stomata of Ginger, Turmeric and Mango Ginger. Flora, Bd. 164, S: 19-28.
  45. Ramayya, N and Rajagopal T. 1980 Classification of subsidiary cells according to inter stomatal space relationships Current Science 49: 671-673.
  46. Rasmussen, H. 1981. Terminology and Classification of Stomata and Stomatal Development- A Critical Survey J. Linn. Soc. 83: 199-212.
  47. Rohweder, O., Schlumpf, R. and Krattinger, K. ? Anmerkungen zum diacytischen Spaltoffnungstyp and zur taxonomischen Bedeutung der Spaltioffnungen in allgemeinen.? Ber. Dtsch. Bor. Ges.? 84 (5) : 275-285.
  48. Solereder, H.1908. Systematic anatomy of the Dicotyledons. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  49. Stevens, R A. and Martin E. S. 1978. A new ontogenetic classification of Stomatal types J. Linn. Soc 77: 53-64
  50. Verdam, Maria C.S., Ohana D.T., Ara?jo Maria G. P., Guilhon Simplicio F., Mendon?a M. S. de, M.M. Pereira 2012. Morphology and anatomy of Justicia acuminatissima leaves. Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia Brazilian Journal of Pharmacognosy. Rev. bras. farmacogn. vol.22 no.6.
  51. Vesque, I. De 1? emploi des Caracteres anatomiques dans la Classification des Vegetaux.? Bull. Soc. Bot. France.? 36: 47-77.
  52. Vijayaraghavan, M.R. and SHUKLA, A.C. 1990. Histochemistry: Theory and Practice. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh Dehra Dun.
  53. Weyers and Meidner 1990. Methods in Plant Physiology, Longman.
  54. Wilkinson H.P. ? ?The plant surface mainly leaf? pp 97-165.In Metcalfe CR and Chalk L ? Anatomy of Dicotyledons I Edn. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

[Thara K Simon. (2018); TRACING STOMATAL ONTOGENY THOUGH FOLIAR HISTOCHEMICAL STUDY IN ACANTHACEAE. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 6 (Feb). 1056-1063] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


THARA K SIMON
Department of Botany, Union Christian College, Aluva. Affiliated to Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/6529      
DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/6529