Vol. 6 (04) pp. 1388-1407 DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/7000

ROLE OF MRCP IN HEPATOBILIARY PATHOLOGY IN CORRELATION WITH ERCP.

, , and
  • Post graduate Department of Radio-diagnosis, Kasturba medical college, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
  • Associate Professor Department of Radio-diagnosis, Kasturba medical college, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
  • Associate Professor Department of pathology, Kasturba medical college, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
  • Post graduate Department of pathology, Kasturba medical college, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
44 Downloads 219 Views
Crossref

Download Full Paper (PDF)

Abstract

Title of the article: Role of MRCP in hepatobiliary pathology in correlation with ERCP. Aim: To determine diagnostic accuracy of MRCP as compared to ERCP for evaluating biliary duct disorders using the specificity, sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values. Patients and methods: From January 2010 to July 2016, 168 patients with suspected biliary pathology were included in this prospective and retrospective observational study. MRCP was performed prior to ERCP in all the patients included in this study. Results: MRCP had a 94.09% sensitivity , 94.03 % specificity ,91.30% positive predictive value 95.96 % negative predictive value (NPV) and 94 % accuracy rates in diagnosing biliary calculus. MRCP had a 92.31% sensitivity , 95.35%, specificity , 85.71% positive predictive value 97.62% negative predictive value (NPV) and 94.64% accuracy rates in diagnosing tumours/cyst MRCP had a 74.51 % sensitivity , 97.44 %specificity , 92.68%, positive predictive value 89.76%negative predictive value (NPV) and 90.48%, accuracy rates in diagnosing tumours/cyst other biliary disorders like CBD stricture, periampullary diverticulum and others. Conclusion: MRCP is an accurate investigation compared with diagnostic ERCP for the assessment of biliary pathologies.

Keywords

Article Analytics

References

  1. Safari, M. T., Miri, M. B., Ebadi, S., Shahrokh, S., &Alizadeh, A. H. M. (2016). Comparing the Roles of EUS, ERCP and MRCP in Idiopathic Acute Recurrent Pancreatitis.?Clinical Medicine Insights. Gastroenterology,?9, 35?39. http://doi.org/10.4137/CGast.S37927
  2. Attri A, Galhotra RD, Ahluwalia A, Saggar K. Obstructive jaundice: Its etiological spectrum and radiological evaluation by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Med J DY PatilUniv 2016;9:443-50
  3. Polistina FA, Frego M, Bisello M, Manzi E, Vardanega A, Perin B. (2015)Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiography compared to operative endoscopy in detecting biliary stones, a single center experience and review of literature. World J Radiol; 7(4): 70-78
  4. SuthaR M, PuRohit S, BhaRgaV V, Goyal P. (2015 Nov) Role of MRCP in differentiation of benign and malignant causes of biliary obstruction. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR.;9(11):TC08.
  5. Chen, W., Mo, J.-J., Lin, L., Li, C.-Q., & Zhang, J.-F. (2015). Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in choledocholithiasis. World Journal of Gastroenterology : WJG, 21(11), 3351?3360. http://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i11.3351.
  6. Oto A, Ernst R, Ghulmiyyah L, Hughes D, Saade G, Chaljub G. (2014 Jan 28)The role of MR cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of pregnant patients with acute pancreaticobiliary disease. The British journal of radiology.
  7. Sohns JM, Staab W, Dabir D, Spiro JE, Bergau L, Schwarz A, Sohns C. (2014 Feb)Current role and future potential of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with an emphasis on incidental findings. Clinical imaging. 28;38(1):35-41.
  8. Sohns JM, Staab W, Dabir D, Spiro JE, Bergau L, Schwarz A, Sohns C.(2014 Feb) Current role and future potential of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with an emphasis on incidental findings. Clinical imaging.? 28;38(1):35-41
  9. Mubarak Ali, Ishtiaq Ahmed, AmjadSattar, MirzaWaseemAkhtar, MujahidHussain, ZaighamAbbas (Oct 2012)Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography in evaluation of obstructivejaundice JPakMedAssoc;62(10):1053-6. Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi.
  10. Chang JH, Lee IS, Lim YS, Jung SH, Paik CN, Kim HK, Kim TH et al . (2012 Feb)Role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for choledocholithiasis: analysis of patients with negative MRCP. Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology. 1;47(2):217-24.
  11. Chang JH, Lee IS, Lim YS, Jung SH, Paik CN, Kim HK, Kim TH et al. (2012 Feb)Role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for choledocholithiasis: analysis of patients with negative MRCP. Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology. 1;47(2):217-24.
  12. Rahman R, Ju J, Shamma's J, Goebel S, Sundaram U. (2009 Dec) Correlation between MRCP andERCP findings at a tertiary care hospital. The West Virginia Medical Journal.;106(5):14-9.
  13. Rahman R, Ju J, Shamma's J, Goebel S, Sundaram U. Correlation between MRCP and ERCP findings at a tertiary care hospital. The West Virginia Medical Journal. 2009 Dec;106(5):14-9.
  14. Sawhney R, Speer T (2009) Patients with a high probability of choledocholithiasis are best managed with ERCP without EUS. Gastrointest Endosc69:982?983
  15. Hurter D, De Vries C, Potgieter P, Barry R, Botha F, Joubert G. (2008 May )Accuracy of MRCP compared to ERCP in the diagnosis of bile duct disorders. SA Journal of Radiology. 3;12(1):14-22.
  16. Hurter D, Chb MB, Potgieter PH, Botha FJH. Accuracy of MRCP compared with ERCP in the diagnosis of bile duct disorders. SA JRadiol. 2008;(April)Romagnuolo J, Currie G (2005) Noninvasive vs. selectiveinvasive biliary imaging for acute biliary pancreatitis: an economic evaluation by using decisiontree analysis. GastrointestEndosc 61:86?97
  17. Halefoglu AM. (2007)Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography:a useful tool in the evaluation of pancreatic and biliary disorders. World J Gastroenterol; 13: 2529?34.
  18. Hallal AH, Amortegui JD, Jeroukhimov IM, Casillas J, Schulman CI, Manning RJ, Habib FA, Lopez PP, Cohn SM, Sleeman D.(2005 Jun 30)Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography accurately detects common bile duct stones in resolving gallstone pancreatitis. Journal of the American College of Surgeons.;200(6):869-75.
  19. Kaltenthaler E, Bravo Vergel Y, Chilcott J, Thomas S, Blakeborough T, Walters SJ etal. (2004);A systematic review and economic evaluation of magnetic resonancecholangiopancreatography compared with diagnostic endoscopic retrogradecholangiopancreatography. Health Technol Assess 8(10).
  20. Ward J, Sheridan MB, Guthrie JA, Davies MH, Millson CE, Lodge JP et al. (2004 Apr) Bile Duct Strictures after Hepatobiliary Surgery: Assessment with MR Cholangiography 1. Radiology.;231(1):101-8.
  21. Munir K, Bari V, Yaqoob J, Khan DB, Usman MU. (2004 Mar) The role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in obstructive jaundice. journal-pakistan medical association.;54(3):128-32.
  22. Topal B, Van de Moortel M, Fieuws S, Vanbeckevoort D, Van Steenbergen W, Aerts R, Penninckx F. (2003 Jan) The value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in predicting common bile duct stones in patients with gallstone disease. British journal of surgery. 1;90(1):42-7.
  23. Kats J, Kraai M, Dijkstra AJ, Koster K, Ter Borg F, Hazenberg HJ, EeftinckSchattenkerk M, Ziedses des Plantes BG, Eddes EH (2003 Mar 17). Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography as a diagnostic tool for common bile duct stones. Digestive surgery.;20(1):32-7.
  24. Kats J, Kraai M, Dijkstra AJ et al. (2003)Magneticresonancecholangiopancreatography as a diagnostic tool for common bile ducts. Dig Surg; 20: 32?7.
  25. Taylor AC, Little AF, Hennessy OF, Banting SW, Smith PJ, Desmond PV. (2002 Jan) Prospective assessment of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 31;55(1):17-22.
  26. Hussein, F. M., Alsumait, B., Aman, S., Sinan, T., Alkandari, K., Hniya, M. H. d. and Alsaeed, O. (2002), Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis and bile duct stenosis by magnetic resonance cholangiogram. Australasian Radiology, 46:?41?46. doi:?10.1046/j.1440-1673.2001.00992.
  27. Lopez Hänninen, Enrique, et al. (2002) "Prospective Evaluation of Pancreatic Tumors: Accuracy of MR Imaging with MR Cholangiopancreatography and MR Angiography 1." Radiology 224.1: 34-41.
  28. Kim, Joo Hee, et al. (2002)"MR Cholangiography in Symptomatic Gallstones: Diagnostic Accuracy according to Clinical Risk Group 1." Radiology 224.2: 410-416.
  29. Capelastegi A. Role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. InMayo Clinic Proceedings 2002 May 31 (Vol. 77, No. 5, pp. 422-428). Elsevier.
  30. Millat B, Decker G, Fingerhut A (2001) Imaging of cholelithiasis: what does the surgeon need? Abdom Imaging 26:3?6
  31. Vitellas KM, Keogan MT, Spritzer CE, Nelson RC. (2000 Jul )MR Cholangiopancreatography of Bile and Pancreatic Duct Abnormalities with Emphasis on the Single-Shot Fast Spin-Echo Technique 1. Radiographics.;20(4):939-57.
  32. Demartines N, Eisner L, Schnabel K, Fried R, Zuber M, Harder F. (2000 Feb) Evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the management of bile duct stones. Archives of Surgery. 1;135(2):148-52Sica GT, Braver J, Cooney MJ, Miller FH, Chai JL, Adams DF. Comparison of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with MR cholangiopancreatography in patients with pancreatitis. Radiology. 1999 Mar;210(3):605-10
  33. Magnuson TH, Bender JS, Duncan MD, Ahrendt SA, Harmon JW, Regan F. (1999 Jul )Utility of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the evaluation of biliary obstruction. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 31;189(1):63-71..
  34. Matos C, Nicaise N, Deviere J, Cassart M, Metens T, Struyven J et al. (1998)Choledochal cysts: comparison of findings at MR cholangiopancreatographyandendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in eight patients. Radiology. Nov;209(2):443-8
  35. Bearcroft, Philip W., and David J. Lomas. (1997) "Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography." Gut 41.2: 135-137
  36. Bilbao MK, Dotter CT, Lee TG, Katon RM. (1976 )Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Gastroenterology. Mar 1;70(3):314-20.

How to Cite This Article

Selva Magesh Tamilarasan, Sonali Ullal, Sharada Rai and Akshay Parth. (2018); ROLE OF MRCP IN HEPATOBILIARY PATHOLOGY IN CORRELATION WITH ERCP., Int. J. of Adv. Res., 6 (04), 1388-1407, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/7000

Corresponding Author

SELVA MAGESH TAMILARASAN
Post graduate, Department of Radio-diagnosis, KMC Mangalore, Manipal academy of higher education, Kasturba medical college, ManipalUniversitY
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.