Vol. 6 (04) pp. 853-867 DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/6921

?MORE RIGHTS AND MORE FREEDOM?: COMPARATIVE REPRESENTATIONS OF GENDER ROLES FROM TURKISH WOMEN IN LONDON.

and
  • Ministry of Interior, Gendarmerie General Command Beştepe Mahallesi Alparslan T?rkeş Caddesi Nu:55 (06560) Yenimahalle-Ankara/Turkey.
  • Department of Geography, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP UK.
21 Downloads 121 Views
Crossref

Download Full Paper (PDF)

Abstract

Migration to another country can change everyday cultural texture significantly, including dominant gender roles. Increasingly commonplace in an age of migration, such change is relevant to the under-researched topic of why migrants settle or move elsewhere. This paper reveals awareness of the cultural shaping of gender roles and practices by highly-educated Turkish immigrant women in London, England. Based on fifteen semi-structured interviews, results show that through lived comparisons of gender and patriarchy fore-grounded strongly contrasting roles. England was depicted as a land of minimal patriarchy and much opportunity, migrants feeling more independent, free and self-confident as women than in Turkey. They felt they could be assimilated relatively easily, aided by their high educational level and English proficiency. In contrast, Turkey was defined as almost wholly discouraging, overwhelmingly patriarchal and male-dominated, rigid in attitudes and sharply gendered. Such comparative assessments, no matter how naively idealized, provide insight into why the reasons (some) migrants settle are not always directly explicable from logics underpinning initial relocation. Migration, in other words, must be acknowledged as continuous relational process more than one-off act of relocation.

Keywords

Article Analytics

References

  1. Assis, G. (2014): Gender and migration from invisibility to agency: the routes of Brazilian women from transnational towns to the United States. Women's Studies International Forum (46): 33-44.
  2. Balan, J. (1981): Why People Move: Comparative Perspectives on the Dynamics of Internal Migration. Paris: UNESCO Press.
  3. Barcus, H. and Halfacree. K. Forthcoming. An Introduction to Contemporary Population Geographies: Lives Across Space. London: Routledge.
  4. Benson, M. and O?Reilly, K. (eds)(2009): Lifestyle Migration Expectations, Aspirations and Experiences.? Farnham: Ashgate.
  5. Bielby, W. and Bielby, D. (1992): I will follow him: family ties, gender role beliefs, and reluctance to relocate for a better job. American Journal of Sociology (97): 1241-1267.
  6. Bryman, A. (2012): Social Research Methods. 4th Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  7. Castles, S. (2000): Ethnicity and Globalization. London: Sage.
  8. Castles S, de Haas H and Miller, M. (2014): The Age of Migration. 5th Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  9. Chubachi, N. (2009): Gender and Construction of the Life Course of Japanese Immigrant Women in Canada. PhD Thesis, Queen?s University, Kingston.
  10. Cresswell, T. (2006): On the Move. London: Routledge.
  11. Curro, C. (2012): National gender norms and transnational identities: migration experiences of Georgian women in London. Slovo24(2): 114-131.
  12. Czaika, M. and de Haas, H. (2013): Briefing Determinants of Migration to the UK. Oxford: Migration Observatory, University of Oxford.
  13. Davis, K. (2013): Editorial: Giving gender studies its due. European Journal of Women?s Studies (20): 331-333.
  14. Docquier F, Lowell B. and Marfouk, A. (2009): A gendered assessment of highly skilled emigration. Population and Development Review35(2): 297-321.
  15. Dumont J C, Martin, J and Spielvogel G (2007) Women on the move: the neglected gender dimension of the brain drain. IZA Discussion Paper No. 2920.
  16. Erel, U. (2009): Migrant Women Transforming Citizenship. Farnham: Ashgate.
  17. Goulahsen, L. (2015): Understanding the complexity of identity and belonging: A case study of French female migrants in Manchester and London. European Journal of Women's Studies (24): 158?173.
  18. Government Equalities Office (2011):Working for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender equality: moving forward. Available at: gov.uk/government/publications/working-for-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-transgender-equality-moving-forward--2.
  19. Halfacree, K. (1995): Household migration and the structuration of patriarchy: evidence from the U.S.A. Progress in Human Geography (19): 159-182.
  20. Halfacree, K. and Boyle, P. (1993): The challenge facing migration research: the case for a biographical approach. Progress in Human Geography (17): 333-348.
  21. Halfacree, K.and Rivera, M.J. (2012): Moving to the countryside? and staying: lives beyond representation. Sociologia Ruralis (52): 92-114.
  22. Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. and Cranford, C. (2006): Gender and Migration. In: Saltzman Chaffetz J. (eds) Handbook of the Sociology of Gender. Houston: Springer, 105-126.
  23. Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. (1994): Gendered Transitions: Mexican Experiences of Immigration. California: University of California Press.
  24. Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. (2000): Feminism and Migration. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (571): 107-120.
  25. Hyman I., Guruge, S. and Mason, R. (2008): The impact of migration on marital relationships: a study of Ethiopian immigrants in Toronto. Journal of Comparative Family Studies (39): 149-163.
  26. Idema, H. and Phalet, K. (2007): Transmission of gender-role values in Turkish-German migrant families: the role of gender, intergenerational and intercultural relations. Zeitschriftf?r Familien for schung (19): 71-105.
  27. Jolly, S. and Reeves, H. (2005): Gender and Migration Overview Report. University of Sussex: Institute of Development Studies.
  28. Kofman, E., Phizacklea, A, Raghuram R. and Sales, R. (2000): Gender and International Migration in Europe. London: Routledge.
  29. Krausova, A. and Vargas-Silva, C. (2014): England: Census Profile. Oxford: Migration Observatory, University of Oxford.
  30. Lindsey, L. (2015): Gender Roles: a Sociological Perspective. 6th London: Routledge.
  31. Lindemann, G. (1996): The Body of Gender Difference. European Journal of Women's Studies (3): 341-361.
  32. Miller, J. and Glassner, B. (2004): The inside and the outside: finding realities in interviews. In: Silverman D (eds) Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice. London: Sage, pp. 124-139
  33. Morokvasic,M. (1983):Women in migration. In: Phizacklea (eds) One Way Ticket., London: Routledge, pp.13-33.
  34. OECD (2016): Database on Immigrants in OECD and non-OECD Countries: DIOC. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/els/mig/dioc.htm (accessed April 2016).
  35. Office for National Statistics(2014a): International migrants in England and Wales: 2011. Available at: http://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/internationalmigration/articles/internationalmigrantsinenglandandwales/2012-12-11(accessed April 2016).
  36. Office for National Statistics (2014b): Published ad hoc data and analysis: population, requests during June. Available at: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/about-ons/business-transparency/freedom-of-information/what-can-i-request/published-ad-hoc-data/pop/june-2014/index.html(accessed January 2015).
  37. Office for National Statistics (2016): Migration Statistics Quarterly Report: May 2016. Available at: http://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/internationalmigration/bulletins/migrationstatisticsquarterlyreport/may2016#immigration-to-the-uk. (accessed June 2016).
  38. Pedraza, S. (1991):Women and migration: the social consequences of gender. Annual Review of Sociology (17): 303-325.
  39. Ravenstein, E. (1885): ?The laws of migration.? Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (48): 167?235.
  40. Repak, T. (1995): Waiting on Washington: Central American Workers in the Nation's Capital. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  41. R?der, A. and M?hlau, P. (2014): Are they acculturating? Europe?s immigrants and gender egalitarianism. Social Forces 92 (3): 899-928.
  42. Sheller, M. and Urry, J. (2006): The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A. (38): 207-226.
  43. Shirpak, K., Maticka-Tyndale, E. and Chinichian, M. (2011): Post migration changes in Iranian immigrants? couple relationships in Canada. Journal of Comparative Family Studies(42): 751-770.
  44. Silvey, R. and Lawson, V. (1999): Placing the migrant. Annals of the Association of American Geographers (89): 121-132.
  45. Simon, R. and Brettel, C. (eds) (1986): International Migration: The Female Experience. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.
  46. UNESCO (2011): Priority Gender Equality Guidelines. Division for Gender Equality,Office of the Director-General. Available at:
http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/BSP/GENDER/GE%20Guidelines%20December%202_FINAL.pdf.(accessed June 2016).
  1. United Nations (UN)(2013): International Migration Report. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, ST/ESA/SER.A/346.
  2. Urry, J. (2007): Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity.
  3. Wharton, A. (2005): The Sociology of Gender. Oxford: Blackwell.
  4. World Economic Forum (2016):Global Gender Gap Index 2014. Available at:http://reports.weforum.org/global-gender-gap-report-2014/rankings/ (accessed June 2016).
  5. Yaman, A.,Mesman, J, van IJzendoorn M, Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. and Linting, M.(2010):Parenting in an individualistic culture with a collectivistic cultural background: the case of Turkish immigrant families with toddlers in the Netherlands. Journal of Child and Family Studies (19): 617-628.
  6. Zarkov, D. (2015): Reflecting on faith and feminism. European Journal of Women?s Studies (22): 3-6.

How to Cite This Article

Ozlem Ozdemir and Keith Halfacree. (2018); ?MORE RIGHTS AND MORE FREEDOM?: COMPARATIVE REPRESENTATIONS OF GENDER ROLES FROM TURKISH WOMEN IN LONDON., Int. J. of Adv. Res., 6 (04), 853-867, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/6921

Corresponding Author

Ozlem Ozdemir
Ministry of Interior, Gendarmerie General Command
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.