Vol. 6 (05) pp. 1367-1370 DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/7168

THE EFFECTIVENESS of the MODULE-BASED STEM (SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, MATHEMATICS) to STUDY PHYSICS AT VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL.

, , , and
  • Department of Post Graduate Science Education, Jember University, East Java, Indonesia.
62 Downloads 203 Views
Crossref

Download Full Paper (PDF)

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to know the effectiveness of the Module-based STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) to study physics at Vocational High School. This research was conducted at SMK PGRI 1 Banyuwangi, Banyuwangi, in April 2018 processed X TKR 3 of 29 students in the even Semester year 2017/2018 lessons. The research design used was one group pretest-posttest design. Based on the results of the effectiveness test, then it is known that the N-value gain of 0.63. Based on the research that has been done, it can be concluded that the module-based STEM has been effective in increasing student learning results before using a module-based STEM after using module STEM.

Keywords

Article Analytics

References

  1. Becker,, & Park, K. 2011. Effects of integrative approaches among science, technology, ?engineering,? and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students learning: A preliminary?? ?meta-analysis. Journal of? STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 12(5/6), 23.
  2. Beers, S. 2011. 21st Century Skills: Preparing Students For Their Future. [Online]http://www.yinghuaaca demy. org/wpcontent/uploads/2014/10/ 21st_century_skills.pdf), accessed 04 December
  3. Bybee, R. W. 2006. The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunity. Arlington, VI: National Science Teachers Association (NSTA) Press.
  4. Hannover Research. (2015) Project-based Learning and Best Practices for Delivering High School STEM Education.
  5. Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingrube, H. 2014. STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an. Washington DC: National Academy of Sciences.
  6. Mayasari, T., Kadarohman, A., & Rusdiana, D. 2014. The Influence Of Integrated Learning Science, Technology. Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) On The Results Of Studying Students: Meta-Analysis Study. Pensa Semnas Proceedings VI "The Role Of Science Literacy?. 371-377
  7. D. E. 2002. The Relationship Between Mathematics Preparation and Conceptual Learning Gains in Physics: A Possible ?Hidden Variable? in Diagnostic Pretest Scores. Journal of am J. Phys. 70(12), 160
  8. Pfeiffer, H.D, Ignatov, D.I., & Poelmans, J (2013) Conceptual Structures for STEM Research and Education. 20th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2013 Mumbai, India, January 10-12, 2013Proceedings. Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-35785-5.
  9. Prastowo, A. 2013 The Creative Guide Makes Innovative Learning Materials. Yogyakarta: Diva Press.
  10. Roberts, A. 2012. A Justification for STEM Education. Technology and Engineering Teacher. 71(8): 1-4. Tersedia di https://www.iteea.org [accessed 19-1-2018].
  11. Sanders, M., Hyuksoo. K., Kyungsuk, P. & Hyonyong, L. 2011. Integrative STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) Education: Contemporary Trends and Issues. Secondary Education 59, 729-762.
  12. Subramaniam, M. M., Ahn, J., Fleischmann, K. R., & Druin, A. 2012. Reimagining the role of school libraries in STEM education: Creating hybrid spaces for exploration. The Library Quarterly, 82(2), 161-182.
  13. Sudjana, Nana. 1990. Assessment of the results of the teaching and learning Process. Bandung: Teen Rosdakarya.Suprawoto, N.A.2009. Develop learning materials with Menyususn Module (online) (http://www.scribe.com/doc/16554502/akso accessed April 4, 2018)
  14. Van den Akker. 1999. Principles and Method of Development Research. London. Dlm. van den Akker, J., Branch, R.M., Gustafson, K., Nieveen, N., & Plomp, T. (pnyt.)?. Design approaches and tools in education and Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
  15. Verma, A. K., Dickerson, D., & McKinney, S. (2011). Engaging Students in STEM Careers with Project-Based Learning?MarineTech Project. Technology and engineering
  16. White, D.W. 2010. What Is STEM Education and Why Is It Important?. Florida Association of Teacher Educators Journal Volume 1 Number 14 2014 1-9.
  17. Yuliati, Di, D. Yulianti, & S. Khanafiyah. 2011. Physics-based Hands-on Learning Activities to foster critical thinking ability and improving the Learning Outcomes of students of JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL. The Journal Physics Education Indonesia. 7:23-27. Available at https://journal.unnes.ac.id [accessed 20-5-2018]
  18. Yusuf, I. 2015. Improvement of the activity and results of the Study of physics Learning Through Empece on Grade XI-IPA 4 SMA Negeri 5 Lessons 2012/2013 years of Yogyakarta. Scientific Journal Teacher Caraka Olah Educational Thought. 19 (1): 71-78. Available at http://journal.uny.ac.id [accessed 20-5-2018].

How to Cite This Article

Ervina Febriyanti, Indrawati, Supeno, Sutarto and I Ketut Mahardika. (2018); THE EFFECTIVENESS of the MODULE-BASED STEM (SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, MATHEMATICS) to STUDY PHYSICS AT VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL., Int. J. of Adv. Res., 6 (05), 1367-1370, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/7168

Corresponding Author

Ervina Febriyanti
University of Jember
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.