18Jul 2018
EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE UNITED NATIONS ORGANIZATIONS: THE LIMITS OF THEORIES AND NEED FOR A NEW ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK.
- Senior Officer, International Programs and Relations, Independent University, Bangladesh.
- Abstract
- References
- Cite This Article as
- Corresponding Author
The article evaluates the effectiveness of the United National Organizations (UNO). The article overviews the argument put forth both by the liberalist tradition that posits UNO is an effective international organization and by the realist tradition that posits UNO to be an ineffective international organization. The article, therefore, argues for need of a new analytical framework to better understand and evaluate the success and/or failure of the UNO in the 21st century and beyond.
- Baylis, John & Smith, Steve & Owens, Patricia (2011). The Globalization of World Politics: An introduction to international relations 5th New York, Oxford University Press
- Burchill, S., et al. (2005). Theories of International Relations. 3rd London: Palgrave Macmillan., pp. 150.
- Dunne, Tim & Kurki, Milja & Smith, Steve (2010). International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity 2nd New York, Oxford University Press.
- Forsyth, Kim (2001) Critical realism and political ecology. London, Athlone Press.
- Grieco, J. M. (1988). Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism, International Organization, 42(3).
- Goodrich, Leland (1974), The United Nations in a changing world, New York:Columbia University Press.
- Hanhim?ki, J. M., (2008) The United Nations: A very short introduction. New York: Oxford University Press., pp. 1.
- Kay, D. A., (1977) The Changing United Nations, Options for the United States, New York: Praeger Special Studies., pp. 3-9
- Kant, Immanuel (1970 ): Political Writings in Reiss, H.S. (edited) London, University of Cambridge Press
- Mearsheimer, J. J. (1994). The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security, 19(3), pp. 13.
- Rittberger, Volker & Zangl, Bernhard (2006) International Organization: Polity, Politics and Policies. New York, Palgrave Macmillan.
- Russett, Bruce (2010) ?Liberalism? in Dunne, Tim, Kurki, Milja and Smith, Steve (eds) International Relations Theories ? Discipline and diversity, New York:Oxford University Press.
- Thakur, Ramesh (ed) (1998), Past Imperfect, Future Uncertain, Basingtoke:The Macmillan Press Ltd
- The Economist, (2012). Leaky Sieve; How world institutions were built. [online]?The Economist Newspaper Limited, Available at: ??? http://economist.come/node/21563273, (Accessed 11 November 2012).
- The Kantian Project in International Relations: ?The earliest theory of globalisation? (2003) http://asrudiancenter.wordpress.com/2011/02/22/the-kantian-project-in-international-relations-the-earliest-theory-of-globalisation/, Date Accessed: 15/11/2012
- United Nations Environmental Programme (2012) ?Environment for development? http://www.un.org/en/globalissues/women/, Date Accessed: 17/11/2012
- Weiss, Thomas & Forsythe, David & Coate, Roger & Pease, Kelly-Kate (2007): The United Nations and Changing World Politics 5th Colorado, Westview Press.
- World Health Organisation Profile: ?Criticisms of the WHO? (2008)?http://tlc.howstuffworks.com/family/who5.htm, Date Accessed: 14/11/2012
- Zaman, Rashed Uz & Biswas, Niloy Ranjan (2014): Bangladesh\'s Participation in UN Peacekeeping Missions and Challenges for Civil?Military Relations: A Case for Concordance Theory, International Peacekeeping.
[Sarwar J. Minar. (2018); EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE UNITED NATIONS ORGANIZATIONS: THE LIMITS OF THEORIES AND NEED FOR A NEW ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 6 (Jul). 457-462] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com
Sarwar J. Minar
Senior Officer, International Programs and Relations, Independent University, Bangladesh (IUB)
Senior Officer, International Programs and Relations, Independent University, Bangladesh (IUB)