Vol. 6 (10) pp. 265-273 DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/7808

COMPARISON OF EFFICIENCY OF OXYTOCIN DRUG WITH MISOPROSTOL IN INDUCTION PREGNANT WOMEN ABORTION IN BAGHDAD.

, ,
  • Ministry of Health - Baghdad Medical office - Al-Karkh, - Karkh Maternity Hospital, Baghdad, IRAQ.
  • High Institute of Infertility Diagnosis and ART\\\'s, AL-Nahrain University, Baghdad, IRAQ.
18 Downloads 125 Views
Crossref

Download Full Paper (PDF)

Abstract

The present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the studyOxytocin with misoprostol in the induction of labor to abortion in a sample of pregnant women in Baghdad Hospital. The study was divided Women who Need an abortion because of fetal death inthe sample consisted of (100) women who needed to have an abortion at the end of pregnancy due to fetal death, and 20 women needing abortion at the beginning of pregnancy too,they were divided into two groups (50) women receive misoprostol, and (50) women receive a drug OxytocinComparisons were made between women.The study also consisted of 20 women with early pregnancy who were divided into two groups each receiving a drug similar to the previous oneMisoprostol was found to be more effective than women in both early and delayed pregnancies.

Keywords

How to Cite This Article

Khulood Abdul Wahab Jumaah, Abbas A. J. AL - Salihi, and Hanaa Mohammed Moheyaldeen. (2018); COMPARISON OF EFFICIENCY OF OXYTOCIN DRUG WITH MISOPROSTOL IN INDUCTION PREGNANT WOMEN ABORTION IN BAGHDAD., International Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR), 6 (10), 265-273, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/7808

Corresponding Author

Khulood Abdul Wahab Jumaah
Ministry of Health - Baghdad Medical office - Al-Karkh, - Karkh Maternity Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq

Article Analytics

References

  1. Joseph, Mercy, Labor Induction, Labor and Delivery 5301 McAuley Drive, Ypsilanti, MI 48197,2014, p1
  2. Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM, Del Valle GO, Delke I, Schroeder PA, Briones DK. Labor induction with the prostaglandin E1 methyl analogue misoprostol versus oxytocin: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 81:332-6.
  3. Xenakis EM, Piper JM, Conway DL, Langer O. Induction of labor in the nineties: conquering the unfavorable cervix. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90:235-9.
  4. ACOG Committee Openion. Induction of labor With Misoprostol No.228 Washington, DC: ACOG ;1999. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 94; 1-2.
  5. Deborah Wing, MD, Induction of labor; indications, techniques, and complications; form UpToDate. June 2005.
  6. Eray caliskan, Harika Bodur, Misoprostol 50 ug Sublingually versus Vaginally for Labor Induction at Term: A Randomized Study, Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation 2005; 59 :155-161.
  7. Fletcher H, Mitchell S, Frederick J, Simeon D, Brown D. IntravaginaI misoprostol versos dinoprostone as cervical ripening and laborinducing agents. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 83:244-7
  8. Chuck FJ, Huffaker BJ. Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervicaI prostaglandin E 2 gel (Prepidil gel): Randomized comparison. Am J Obstet GynecoI 1995; 173:1137-42.
  9. Owen J, Hauth JC. Oxytocin for the induction or augmentation of labor. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1992; 35:464-75,
  10. Hofmeyer GJ, Gulmezoglu AM. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction in late pregnancy (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2000. Oxford: Update Software.
  11. Clark A, Cook V, Hill P, Spinnato J. Cervical ripening and labor induction: misoprostol vs. dinoprostone. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 178:30.
  12. Bennett KA, Butt K, Crane JMG, Hutchens D, Young DC. A masked randomized comparison of oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol for labor induction. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 92:481-6.
  13. Kubli FW, Hon EH, Khazin AF, Takemura H. Observations on heart rate and pH in human fetus during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1969; 104:1190-206
  14. Toppozada MK, Anwar MYM, Hassan HA, El-Gazaerly WE. Oral or vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1997; 56:135-9.
  15. Wing DA, Ham D, Paul RH. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol with vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180(5):1155-60
  16. Toppozada MK, Anwar MYM, Hassan HA, El-Gazaerly WE. Oral or vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1997; 56:135-9.
  17. Xenakis EM, Piper JM, Conway DL, Langer O. Induction of labor in the nineties: conquering the unfavorable cervix. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90:235-9.
  18. Buser D, Mora G, Arias F. A randomized comparison between misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction in patients with unfavorable cervices. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89(4):581-5.
  19. Wing DA, Ham D, Paul RH. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol with vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180(5):1155-60
  20. Kadanali S, K???k?zkan T, Zor N, Kumtepe Y. Comparison of labor induction with misoprostol vs. oxytocin/prostaglandin E2 in term pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1996;55(2):99-104.
  21. Buser D, Mora G, Arias F. A randomized comparison between misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction in patients with unfavorable cervices. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89(4):581-5.
  22. Ventura SJ, Martin JA, Curtin SC, Mathews TJ. Report of final natality statistics, 1995. Monthly vital statistics report; vol. 45, No. 11 (Suppl). Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics; 1997.
  23. Wing DA, Jones MM, Rahall A, Goodwin TM, Paul RH. Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172:1811-6.
  24. Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM, Del Valle GO, Delke I, Schroeder PA, Briones DK. Labor induction with the prostaglandin E1 methyl analogue misoprostol versus oxytocin: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 81:332-6.
  25. Ngai SW, To WK, Lao T, Ho PC. Cervical priming with oral misoprostol in pre-labor rupture of membranes at term. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87:923-6.
  26. Patel A, Gilles JM, Moffett D, Mahram R, Diro M, Burkett G. Can misoprostol be interchanged with oxytocin for augmentation of labor? Obstet Gynecol 2000;95(Suppl):105.
  27. Kadanali S, K???k?zkan T, Zor N, Kumtepe Y. Comparison of labor induction with misoprostol vs. oxytocin/prostaglandin E2 in term pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1996;55(2):99-104.
  28. Patel A, Gilles JM, Moffett D, Mahram R, Diro M, Burkett G. Can misoprostol be interchanged with oxytocin for augmentation of labor? Obstet Gynecol 2000;95(Suppl):105.
  29. Kramer RL, Gilson GJ, Morrison DS, Martin D, Gonzales JL, Qualls CR. A randomized trial of misoprostol and oxytocin for induction of labor: safety and efficacy. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89(3):387-91.
  30. Hofmeyer GJ, Gulmezoglu AM. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labour induction in late pregnancy (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2000. Oxford: Update Software.
  31. Campos GA, Guzm?n S, Rodriguez JG, Voto LS, Margulies M. Misoprostol - un an?logo de la PGE1 - para la inducci?n de parto a t?rmino: estudio comparativo y randomizado con oxitocina. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol 1994;59(3):190-5. discussion 195-6.
  32. Ramos L, Kaunitz AM, Del Valle GO, Delke I, Schroeder PA, Briones DK. Labor induction with the prostaglandin E1 methyl analogue misoprostol versus oxytocin: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 1993;81(3):332-6.
  33. Kadanali S, K???k?zkan T, Zor N, Kumtepe Y. Comparison of labor induction with misoprostol vs. oxytocin/prostaglandin E2 in term pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1996;55(2):99-104.

Similar Articles

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.