Vol. 6 (11) pp. 346-350 DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/8004

EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT COMBINATIONS OF IRRIGATING SOLUTIONS AND CORE MATERIALS ON THE FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF ENDODONTICALLY TREATED TEETH.

and
  • Ain Shams University, Egypt.
24 Downloads 134 Views
Crossref

Download Full Paper (PDF)

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of using different irrigating solutions (EDTA and Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCL)) during root canal treatment combined with different composite core materials (Multicore Flow (MCF) and SonicFill (SF) on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Material and Methods: 40 recently extracted mandibular first premolar teeth were selected. Teeth were randomly divided into two groups (n=20) according to the irrigating solution used during root canal treatment; Group I: EDTA, Group II: Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCL). Each main group was further subdivided into two equal subgroups (10 each) according to core material used; Subgroup A: Multicore Flow (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) (MCF), subgroup B: SonicFill (SF) (Kerr, Orange, CA, USA). The force in newton (N) was applied obliquely to the buccal cusp tips utilizing a specially designed attachment at cross head speed of 0.5mm/ minute until fracture and the maximum loads at which failure occurred were recorded. Results: no significant difference among the tested core material was recorded, however a significant difference with irrigating solutions was recorded where sodium hypochlorite significantly decreased fracture resistance more than EDTA with both core materials.

Keywords

How to Cite This Article

Shady Ali Hussein and Ahmed A. Laithy (2018); EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT COMBINATIONS OF IRRIGATING SOLUTIONS AND CORE MATERIALS ON THE FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF ENDODONTICALLY TREATED TEETH., International Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR), 6 (11), 346-350, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/8004

Corresponding Author

Shady Ali Hussein
Ain Shams University, Egypt

Article Analytics

References

  1. Ebrahim M, Syam A, Hassan A, Mohammed S. Effect of different irrigation solutions on the fracture resistance of Endodontically teeth. EC Dental Science. 2017;15: 234-239.
  2. Torabinejad, M., Handysides, R., Khademi, A.A. et al.?Clinical implications of the smear layer in endodontics: a review.?Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod.?2002;?94:?658?666
  3. Prado M, Gusman H, Gomes B, Simao R. Scanning Electron Microscopic Investigation of the Effectiveness of Phosphoric Acid in Smear Layer Removal When Compared with EDTA and Citric Acid
  4. Takeda, F.H., Harashima, T., Kimura, Y. et al.?A comparative study of the removal of smear layer by three endodontic irrigants and two types of laser.?Int Endod J.?1999;?32:?32?39
  5. Economides, N., Liolios, E., Kolokuris, I. et al.?Long-term evaluation of the influence of smear layer removal on the sealing ability of different sealers.?J Endod.?1999;?25:?123?125
  6. Gogos, C., Stavrianos, C., Kolokouris, I. et al.?Shear bond strength of AH-26 root canal sealer to dentine using three dentine bonding agents.?J Dent.?2003;?31:?321?326
  7. Cagidiaco, M.C., Ferrari, M., Vichi, A. et al.?Mapping of tubule and intertubule surface areas available for bonding in class V and class II preparations.?J Dent.?1997;?25:?379?389
  8. Garbeloglio, R. and Becce, C.?Smear layer removal by root canals irrigants.?Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod.?1994;?78:?359?367
  9. Takeda, F.H., Harashima, T., Kimura, Y. et al.?A comparative study of the removal of smear layer by three endodontic irrigants and two types of laser.?Int Endod J.?1999;?32:?32?39
  10. P?rez-Heredia, M., Ferrer-Luque, C.M., and Gonz?lez-Rofriguez, M.P.?The effectiveness of different acid irrigating solutions in root canal cleaning after hand and rotary instrumentation.?J Endod.?2006;32:?993?997
  11. Baumgatner J.C. and Mader C.L.?A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of four root canal irrigation regimens.?J Endod.?1987;?13:?147?157
  12. Sadek FT, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Tay FR, Cardoso PE, Ferrari M. Bond strength performance of different resin composites used as core materials around fiber posts.?Dent Mater.?2007; 23:1, 95:99.
  13. Sahafi A, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E, Gotfredsen K. Retention and failure morphology of prefabricated posts.?Int J Prosthodont.?2004;17:307?12
  14. Salameh Z, Papacchini F, Ounsi HF, Goracci C, Tashkandi E, Ferrari M. Adhesion between prefabricated fiber-reinforced posts and different composite resin cores: a microtensile bond strength evauluation.?J Adhes Dent.?2006;8:113?7.
  15. Naumann M, Sterzenbach G, Rosentritt M, Beuer F, Frankenberger R. In vitro performance of self-adhesive resin cements for post-and-core build-ups: influence of chewing simulation or 1-year storage in 0.5% chloramine solution.?Acta Biomater.?2010;6:4389?95.
  16. Ozdemir HO, Buzoglu HD, Calt S. Chemical and ultramorphologic effects of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and sodium hypochlorite in young and old root canal dentin. J Endod 2012;38:204?8.
  17. Marending M, Paque F, Fischer J. Impact of irrigant sequence on mechanical properties of human root dentin. J Endod 2007;33:1325?8.
  18. Mai S, Kim YK, Arola DD. Differential aggressiveness of ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid in causing canal wall erosion in the presence of sodium hypochlorite. J Dent 2010;38:201?6.
  19. Yasuda G, Inage H, Kawamoto R. Changes in elastic modulus of adhesive and adhesive-infiltrated dentin during storage in water. J Oral Sci 2008;50:481?6.
  20. Saghiri MA, Delvarani A, Mehrvarzfar P. A study of the relation between erosion and micro-hardness of root canal dentin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108:29?34.
  21. Sayin TC, Serper A, Cehreli ZC. The effect of EDTA, EGTA, EDTAC and tetracycline-HCl with and without subsequent NaOCl treatment on the microhardness of root canal dentin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104:418?24.
  22. Ballal NV, Mala K, Bhat KS. Evaluation of the effect of maleic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on the microhardness and surface roughness of human root canal dentin. J Endod 2010;36:1385?8. 28.
  23. Cruz-Filho AM, Sousa-Neto MD, Savioli RN. Effect of chelating solutions on the microhardness of root canal lumen dentin. J Endod 2011;37:358?62.
  24. Moshaverinia A, Brantley WA, Chee WW. Measure of microhardness, fracture toughness and flexural strength of N-vinylcaprolactam (NVC)-containing glassionomer dental cements. Dent Mater 2010;26:1137?43.
  25. Calt S, Serper A. Time-dependent effects of EDTA on dentin structures. J Endod 2002;28:17?9.
  26. S ?en BH, Ert?urk ?O, Pis ?kin B. The effect of different concentrations of EDTA on instrumented root canal walls. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 108:622?7.
  27. Emel Uzunoglu, Sevinc Aktemur, M. Ozgur Uyanik, Veli Durmaz,Emre Nagas, Effect of Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid on Root Fracture with Respect to Concentration at Different Time Exposures. JOE 2012 ;38:1110-3
  28. Cobankara FK, Adanir N, Belli S. Evaluation of the influence of smear layer on the apical and coronal sealing ability of two sealers. J Endod 2004;30:406?9.
  29. Vilanova WV, Carvalho-Junior JR, Alfredo E. Effect of intra-canal irrigants on the bond strength of epoxy resin-based and methacrylate resin-based sealers to root canal walls. Int Endod J 2012;45:42?8.
  30. Alrahlah, N. Silikas and D.C. Watts. Post-cure depths of cure of bulk fill dental resin-composites. Dent mater J 2014; 30:149?154.
  31. Funda ?zt?rk-Bozkurta , Tugba Toz-Akalina , Burcu G?zeticia , Mahmut Kusdemira , Alev ?zsoya , Harika Gozukara-Bağb and Mutlu ?zcanc. Load-bearing capacity and failure types of premolars restored with sonic activated bulk-fill-, nano-hybrid and siloranebased resin restorative materials. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2016; 30 (17).

Similar Articles

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.