Vol. 7 (01) pp. 1232-1238 DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/8445

COMPARISON BETWEEN THE CT & MRI FOR MENINGIOMA IN THE BRAIN IN KING KHALID UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL RIYADH K.S.A.

  • X-ray department, Al-Aflaj General Hospital M.O.H, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
  • Department of Oral &Maxillofacial Radiology, Al-Farabi College of Dentistry and Nursing, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
  • College of Applied Medical Science, Department of Radiologic Technology Qassim University, Buraydah ., Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
  • Department of oral &Maxillofacial Radiology Al-Farabi College of Dentistry and Nursing, Riyadjh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
46 Downloads 185 Views
Crossref

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the diagnostic accuracy values of CT. Scan in the detection of meningioma in the brain. Correlated the accuracy of MRI with meningioma volume in (CC). Methods:Prospective study of Saudi both males & females patients of different age?randomly of 35 patients using CT. Scan axial, sagittal and coronal scans while in MRI Scan using standard protocol of examinations T1weighted image and T2 weighted image in all cases were examined. The results are classified in tables and using Chi-Square analysis. Results: Both CT. Scan and MRI exam?s can find meningioma lesion more than zero (cc). The table -7 Chi-Square test showing the P. Value =0.410 > 0.05 showing No. significant between the CT. Scan and MRI in finding the meningioma. Moreover, the table-10: Shows Chi-Square the P.value =0.008 > 0.05 showing significant in assessment of meningioma volume in (cc). Conclusion: Meningioma CT. Scan is useful examination in emergency patients. While MRI should always be considered as an indispensable imaging modality in the assessment of meningioma volume (cc). Both CT. Scan and MRI are used to support the diagnosis and evaluation of meningioma. But MRI is better in accurate diagnosis meningioma volume (cc).

Keywords

Article Analytics

References

  1. Whelan HT, Clanton JA, Wilson RE&Tulipan NB, (1988, Sep-Oct ). Comparison of CT and MRI brain tumor imaging using a canine glioma model.?? PediatrNeurol, 4(5),279-83.
  2. Sch?rner W,?et al.,? (1990). Intracranial meningiomas. Comparison of plain and contrast-enhanced examinations in CT and MRI. Neuroradiology,32(1),12-8.
  3. Chen C.,?et al.,?( 2007). Histopathology of Radiation Necrosis with Severe Peritumoral Edema after Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Parasagittal Meningioma? .StereotactFunctNeurosurg ,85,292?295. https://doi.org/10.1159/000107362
  4. Prabhakar R1, Haresh KP, Ganesh T, Joshi RC, Julka PK&Rath GK,(2007).
  5. GBD 2015 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence, Collaborators. (8 October 2016).?"Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015".?Lancet.?388(10053): 1545?1602.?doi:1016/S0140-6736(16)31678-6.?PMC?5055577.?PMID?27733282
  6. Amit Mittal, Kennith F. Layton,? Sam Finn, Snipes, and?Michael J. Opatowsky, Cystic meningioma: unusual imaging appearance of a common intracranial tumor,Proc (BaylUniv Med Cent). 2010 Oct; 23(4): 429?431
  7. Saloner,? Uzelac,?S. Hetts,?A. Martin,?&?W. Dillon( 2010 ,Sep).Modern meningioma imaging techniques.J Neurooncol,99(3), 333?340..?doi:??10.1007/s11060-010-0367-6
  8. Chamoun R, Krisht KM&Couldwell WT, (2011) . Incidental meningiomas. Neurosurg Focus, 31(6),E19. doi: 10.3171/2011.9.FOCUS11220.
  9. Marta GN, Correa SF&Teixeira MJ (2011). Meningioma: review of the literature with emphasis on the approach to radiotherapy. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 11(11),1749-58. doi: 10.1586/era.11.162.
  10. Winward Choy, B.A., ?etal? ,( 2011 . The molecular genetics and tumor pathogenesis of meningiomas and the future directions of meningioma treatments. Neurosurg Focus,30 (5),
  11. Koech,? Orege,?F. Ndiangui,B. Macharia,?and?N. Mbaruku(2013).Multiple Intracranial Meningiomas: A Review of the Literature and a Case Report. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Case Reports in Surgery, Article ID 131962, 4pages.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/131962.
  12. Watts,? Box,?A. Galvin,?P. Brotchie,?N. Trost,?and?T. Sutherland (2014, Feb) Magnetic resonance imaging of meningiomas: A pictorial review.Insights Imaging,5(1), 113 ?122. doi:??10.1007/s13244-013-0302-4.
  13. Fu Y, Sun ZH, Zhang J&Liu HT,(2015).Cystic meningioangiomatosis with enhancing mural nodule on MRI and no calcification on CT. Neurol Neurochir Pol,49(1),58-60. doi: 10.1016/j.pjnns.2014.12.001. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
  14. Sun Z, ?et al.,?( 2015). Three cases of sporadic meningioangiomatosis with different imaging appearances: case report and review of the literature. World J Surg Oncol. 28,13-89. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0477-x4.
  15. Akira Kunimatsu , ?et al.,?( 2016). Variants of meningiomas: a review of imaging findings and clinical features .Japanese Journal of Radiology, 34,( 7) ,pp 459?469.
  16. Benita Tamrazi, Mark S. Shiroishi? and ?Chia-Shang J. Liu ( 2016) .? Advanced Imaging of Intracranial Meningiomas.? NeurosurgClin N Am, 27(2), 137?143. doi:10.1016/j.nec.2015.11.004.
  17. Mehdorn HM (2016).Intracranial Meningiomas: A 30-Year Experience and Literature Review. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg. (43),139-84. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-21359-0_6.
  18. https://www.abta.org . Copy right ? 2017.
  19. The mean and median volume of the tumor as measured from MR scans was 19.67 cc +/- 13.73 and 16.13 cc (range: 3.25 cc.The mean and median CM shift between CT and MR was 5.47 mm and 5.21 mm respectively
  20. Sultan Alshoabi, ⃰MoawiaGameraddin, Suliman Salih1, Jumaa Tamboul1, FathelrehmanAlagab,SuzanAbdelmaboud, Evaluation of Meningioma of the brain and spine with Computerized Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging, April 2015 with 117 Reads Taibah University King Saudi Arabia.

How to Cite This Article

Hisham Al-nutayfi, Farah Masaad, Abdullah Hamdan, Nasraldeen Alnaeem Alkhidir and Sajna Ashraf. (2019); COMPARISON BETWEEN THE CT & MRI FOR MENINGIOMA IN THE BRAIN IN KING KHALID UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL RIYADH K.S.A., Int. J. of Adv. Res., 7 (01), 1232-1238, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/8445

Corresponding Author

Abdalla .Hamdan
Saudi Arabia