Vol. 7 (03) pp. 916-929 DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/8716

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON WATER SORPTION AND SOLUBILITY OF THREE SOFT LINERS IN DIFFERENT SOLUTIONS: AN IN-VITRO STUDY.

, , , , and
117 Downloads 276 Views
Crossref

Download Full Paper (PDF)

Abstract

Aim:Two silicone based soft denture lining materials (Mollosil, Molloplast-B), and an acrylic resin based soft denture liner (Viscogel) were selected for comparative evaluation of sorption and solubility in different solutions at different time intervals. Methodology: In this study two silicone based soft denture lining materials (Mollosil, Molloplast-B), and acrylic based soft denture liner (Viscogel) were selected for comparative evaluation of sorption and solubility in different solutions at different time intervals. 50 specimens for each material: Mollosil, Molloplast-B and Viscogel were prepared using brass dies of dimensions - 50mm diameter, 0.5mm thickness. The specimens were stored in different solutions (distilled water, denture cleanser and artificial saliva- acidic, basic, neutral), and tested after 1,4 and 16 weeks for sorption and solubility. Analysis of variance was used to find the significant differences between the materials at all time intervals. Result: The acrylic resin soft lining materials had higher solubility (3.920% Viscogel in acidic saliva) and absorption (3.138% Viscogel in distilled water) than Molloplast-B after 16 weeks of aging. Conclusion: The silicone based soft liner Mollosil, showed the highest percentage of sorption and solubility in artificial saliva than in distilled water, while an acrylic based Viscogel showed the highest percentage solubility in artificial saliva, and lowest percentage of sorption in distilled with the exception of Molloplast-B, which showed the highest percentage of solubility and sorption in distilled water, compared to all these soft lining materials.

Article Analytics

References

  1. Goll G, Smith DE, Plein JB. The effect of denture cleansers on temporary soft liners. J Prosthet Dent. 1983 Oct 1;50(4):466-72.
  2. El-Hadary A, Drummond JL. Comparative study of water sorption, solubility, and tensile bond strength of two soft lining materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Mar 1;83(3):356-61.
  3. Dootz ER, Koran A, Craig RG. Physical property comparison of 11 soft denture lining materials as a function of accelerated aging. J Prosthet Dent. 1993 Jan 1;69(1):114-9.
  4. Chladek G, Zmudzki J, Kasperski J. Long-term soft denture lining materials. Materials (Basel), 2014;7(8):5816-42.
  5. Anusavice KJ. Phillips\' science of dental materials.11th Elsevier Health Sciences; 2003:655-719.
  6. Kawano F, Dootz ER, Koran AI, Craig RG. Sorption and solubility of 12 soft denture liners. J Prosthet Dent. 1994 Oct 1;72(4):393-8.
  7. Parker S, Braden M. Soft prosthesis materials based on powdered elastomers. Biomaterials. 1990 Sep 1;11(7):482-90.
  8. Kalachandra S, Turner DT. Water sorption of plasticized denture acrylic lining materials. Dent Mater. 1989 May 1;5(3):161-4.
  9. Braden M, Wright PS. Water absorption and water solubility of soft lining materials for acrylic dentures. J Dent Res. 1983 Jun;62(6):764-8.
  10. Travaglini EA, Gibbons P, Craig RG. Resilient liners for dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1960 Jul 1;10(4):664-72.
  11. Craig RG, Gibbons P. Properties of resilient denture liners. J Am Dent Assoc. 1961 Sep 1;63(3):382-90.
  12. Kazanji MNM, Watkinson AC: Soft lining materials: their absorption of and solubility in artificial saliva. Br Dent J 1988;165:91.
  13. Craig RG, Gibbons P. Properties of resilient denture liners. J Am Dent Assoc. 1961 Sep 1;63(3):382-90.
  14. Yanikoglu ND, Duymus ZY. Comparative study of water sorption and solubility of soft lining materials in the different solutions. Dental Mater. 2004;23(2):233-9.
  15. Jabbal RS, Datta K. Comparative evaluation of water sorption and solubility of two autopolymerizing soft denture liners in distilled water and artificial saliva. Indian J Dent Sci. 2016 Oct 1;8(4):208.
  16. Garg A, Shenoy KK. A comparative evaluation of effect on water sorption and solubility of a temporary soft denture liner material when stored either in distilled water, 5.25% sodium hypochlorite or artificial saliva: An in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2016 Jan;16(1):53.

How to Cite This Article

Anagha Menon, Bhavana B.L, Rupesh P.L, Basavaraj S.Salagundi, Savitha K.C and Nithya. R. Krishnan. (2019); COMPARATIVE STUDY ON WATER SORPTION AND SOLUBILITY OF THREE SOFT LINERS IN DIFFERENT SOLUTIONS: AN IN-VITRO STUDY., Int. J. of Adv. Res., 7 (03), 916-929, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/8716

Corresponding Author

Dr. Anagha Menon
MDS III YR POST GRADUATE, COORG INSTITUTE OF DENTAL SCIENCES
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.