Vol. 7 (02) pp. 941-951 DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/8566

ENGLISH COMMUNICATION INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL TO ENHANCE LISTENING-SPEAKING ABILITIES OF POLICE STUDENTS AT POLICE PROVINCIAL TRAINING CENTER REGION 7.

  • Ph.D. Candidate in Curriculum and Instruction, Faculty of Education, Silpakorn University, Thailand.
  • Thesis advisors, Faculty of Education, Silpakorn University, Thailand.
19 Downloads 130 Views
Crossref

Abstract

The purposes of this research were: 1) to study the necessity of English listening-speaking skills of police students at Police Provincial Training Center Region 7; 2) to develop an English communication instructional model to meet the efficiency criteria of 80/80; 3) to compare listening-speaking abilities of police students before and after given an English communication instructional model and its effect size; and 4) to survey police students? opinion towards the English communication instructional model. The researcher indicated the sample size with purposive sampling, retrieving 30 police students, who have been selected for admission to the Police Cadet Course of the fiscal year 2017. The research tools were 10 lessons and teaching material in accordance with the English communication instructional model. Data was analyzed by Mean, Standard Deviation, Effect size, and Dependent t-test. The results of this research were as follow: the students? needs identified by the self-assessment questionnaires showed that student needs on content, language use and benefits were appropriate for practical situations. The efficiency score of an English communication instructional model was 78.77/ 80.67, which was at the acceptable level based on the criterion stated. The listening-speaking abilities after using an English communication instructional model were significantly higher at the level of 0.05; and its effect size was very large at level of 5.37.The students? opinions toward the English communication instructional model were at high level.

Keywords

Article Analytics

References

  1. Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University.
  2. Buck, G. (2001). Assessing Listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
  3. Byrne, D. (1990). Process VS Content. In English Teaching in Perspectives. London: Longman.
  4. Carroll, B. J. (1980). Testing Communicative Performance. Oxford: Pergamon.
  5. Celce?Murcia, M. and Olstain, E. (2000). Discourse and Context in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
  6. Chomchuen, K. et al. (2011). The development of an English manual for traffic police in Bangkok. Faculty of Humanities and Social Science, SuanDusitRajabhat University.
  7. Chuenchom, P. (2011).The development of English listening and speaking skills of MathayomSuksa 4 Students at NawamaRachanusorn School by using role-playing, Thesis of Master of Education, DhonburiRajabhat University.
  8. Finocchiaro, M. and Bonomo, M. (1973). The Foreign Language Learners: A Guide for Teachers. New York: Regents Publishing.
  9. Finocchiaro, M. and Brumfit, C. (1983). The Functional?Notional Approach from Theory to Practice. Oxford: Oxford University.
  10. Harmer, J. (1992).The Practice of English Language Teaching. London: Longman.
  11. Harris, D. P. (1988). Testing English as a Second Language. New York: McGraw?Hill.
  12. Heaton, J. B. (1990). Classroom testing: Testing Speaking Skills. London: Longman.
  13. Hybel, S. (1995). Communicating Effective Approach. New York: McGraw?Hill.
  14. Johnson, K. andMorrow, K. (1981). Communication in the Classroom: Application and Mathods for a Communicative Approach. London: Longman.
  15. Lazaraton, A. (2001). Teaching oral skill. In M. Celce?Murcia (Ed.) Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (3rd). Boston:Heinle&Heinle.
  16. Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
  17. Littlewood, W. (1989).Foreign and Second Language Learning: Language Acquisition Research and its Implications for the Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
  18. Littlewood, W. (1995). Communicative Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
  19. Meksutas, S. (2005). The development of English Supplementary listening exercises based on local topics for eighth grade students of Tessaban 2 WatPrasattong School, SuphanBuri. Thesis of Master of Education, Silpakorn University.
  20. Ministry of Education. (2013). New English language teaching and learning management manual according to the European language proficiency reference framework: secondary level. Bangkok: English Language Institute, Office of the Basic Education Commission.
  21. Nicholas, L. N. (1988). Teaching Listening Comprehension. English Teaching Forum, 26, 19?22.
  22. Nunan, D. (2004). Task?based Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
  23. Oxford, R. L. (1993). Research update on teaching L2 System, 21: 205?211.
  24. Park, C. (2004). The Graduate Teaching Assistant (GTA): Lessons from North American Experience. Teaching in Higher Education, 9(3), 349?361.
  25. Ponglangka, K. (2007). The study of using role-playing activities to develop English speaking ability of Mathayom five students, Independent Study of Master of Arts, Srinakharinwirot University.
  26. Puensaen, W. (2011). The development of skills in the use of English for tourism police in Khonkaen province, Independent study of Master of Public Administration, Khonkaen University.
  27. Pumarin, S. (2005). The development of English language training courses for the performance of tourist police officers under the Tourist Police Division. Thesis of Master of Education, PhranakhonRajabhat University.
  28. Richards, J. (1987). Listening comprehension: Approach, design, procedure. In M.H. Long & J.C. Richards (Eds.), Methodology in TESOL?A book of readings. New York: Newbury House.
  29. Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  30. Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative Language Teaching Today. Singapore: Cambridge University.
  31. Richards, J. C., Platt, J., and Platt, H. (1992). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching & Applied Linguistics. UK: Longman Group.
  32. Richards, J. C. and Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (2nd). Cambridge University.
  33. Rivers, W. M. (1980). English Teaching Foreign Language Skills. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
  34. Rost, M. (1991). Listening in Action. New Jersey: Prentice?Hall.
  35. Scott, R. (1981). Speaking? in Communication in the Classroom (ed.). Keith Jonson and Keith Morrow, London: Longman.
  36. Siribun et al. (2005). Production of English language training sets for tourist police at KoSamui District, SuratThani Province. Independent Study of Master of Arts, Naresuan University.
  37. Stufflebeam, D. L., &Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation Theory, Models and Applications. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  38. Tipmontree, S. (2007). The Use and the problems of English and intercultural communication skills of Thai tourist police officers. Thesis, University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce.
  39. Torut, S. (2006). The Development of EFL Supplementary Materials for Thai learners. Journal of Education, Silpakorn University. 3, 2(March), 51-75.
  40. Valette, R. M. (1977). Modern Language Testing. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  41. Valette, R. M. and Disick, R. S. (1972).Modern Language Performance Objectives and Individualizations. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  42. Weir, C. J. (1993).Understanding & Developing Language Tests. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice?Hall.
  43. Williams, E. (1994). Reading in the Language Classroom (8th). London: MacMillan.
  44. Wipf, J. (1984). Strategies for Teaching Second Language Listening Comprehension. Foreign Language Annals, 17.

How to Cite This Article

Kritaya Sukprasert, Sa-ngiam Torut, Bamrung Torut and Pranee Ninlakorn. (2019); ENGLISH COMMUNICATION INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL TO ENHANCE LISTENING-SPEAKING ABILITIES OF POLICE STUDENTS AT POLICE PROVINCIAL TRAINING CENTER REGION 7., Int. J. of Adv. Res., 7 (02), 941-951, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/8566

Corresponding Author

Kritaya Sukprasert
Ph.D. Candidate in Curriculum and Instruction, Faculty of Education, Silpakorn University, Thailand